CrowdStrike

No single number decides. Layers can disagree — that's the point. New to this? →

• bullish assessment Christina Cacioppo

  I think CrowdStrike will do it better for an enterprise.

• bullish endorsement Unattributed

  I picked up names like CrowdStrike and Splunk and Blackstone and you know companies with big balance sheets that tended to do well in an economic recovery and and I'm bullish on on again

• bullish assessment Tom

  we were investors in crowdstrike uh it's a obviously a fantastic company testament to the fact that if you know if you have a company that goes down and the world stops you know they've kind of made a difference in the world or pushed a wave out and that's true for crowdstrike for them the innovation was using the cloud and the central intelligence of taking all the intel from endpoints i.e computers bringing it to their central cloud taking that data and using that knowledge to push out updates

• mixed assessment Kyle

  crowdstrike is the most amazing sexy cool formula one car and i mean that even with this issue they're a great team great product we have huge respect for them yeah but think about this if i was walking into an it department or that health firm whether they're internal or they're an external it department and said here's keys to the formula one they wouldn't even know how to drive it right it's complex they don't know how it works

• neutral fact_claim Kyle Hanslivan

  crowd strike really does well for the kind of fortune 5000

• bearish criticism David Sacks

  One thing I want to say, none of us are at any risk of running Palantir on our servers. Okay? CrowdStrike is running in the background of many, many companies who may not even be fully aware of it. And they were certainly surprised when all those airlines' computers went down. Right? So my only point is maybe you should make sure about whether you're running their products or not, and then make a conscious decision whether you think that's a good idea. That's all.