0%
0/2 resolved calls right
6 scored · avg 5
single source
1
companies · 1 data points
Instagram would be worth $200-300 billion as a standalone company.
What happened: There is no publicly available valuation confirming that Instagram alone reached a $200–$300 billion valuation, so the prediction cannot be verified.
Verify at source ↗YouTube would be worth $200-300 billion as a standalone company.
What happened: YouTube remains a subsidiary of Alphabet and has not been spun off as an independent company with an estimated $200–300 billion valuation; no public valuation of YouTube alone has reached that range.
Verify at source ↗YouTube would be worth 50% more as an independent company.
What happened: YouTube remains a subsidiary of Alphabet and has never been spun off as an independent company, so its standalone valuation has never been publicly disclosed.
Verify at source ↗Android would be worth 50% more as an independent company.
What happened: Android has remained a platform owned by Google (Alphabet) and has not been spun off into an independent company; no valuation of an independent Android exists that would support a 50% increase.
Verify at source ↗AWS would be worth 50% more as an independent company.
What happened: There is insufficient publicly available data to determine whether AWS, as an independent entity, would be valued 50% higher than its implied value at the time of the prediction.
Verify at source ↗Instagram would be worth 50% more as an independent company.
What happened: There is no independent Instagram entity to evaluate a valuation, so the prediction cannot be verified against real-world outcomes.
Verify at source ↗And that compression, while largely not just maintaining the product, but actually accelerating product experimentation and so forth. Now, there's a whole other discussion whether the business model is sort of creaking a little bit, but that seems separate from can you run this company in a more efficient way.