SPEAKER_00: Hey everybody, it's Thursday. So we have my friend Lon Harris back to talk about the three big shows, The Dropout, We Crash, and Super Pumped. Lon, it's going to be an amazing episode. You're going to tell us what to think of these shows and it will be very spoiler heavy. So stick with us. SPEAKER_03: It's going to be an amazing episode. This Week in Startups is brought to you by Odoo. Odoo is a fully customizable and fully integrated suite of business apps that lets you build and scale your stack as you build and scale your business. Your first app is free forever and right now Odoo is offering $1,000 off your first implementation pack at odoo.com slash twist. That's O-D-O-O dot com slash twist. And Broker's Startup Insurance Plan helps startups secure the most important types of insurance at a lower cost and with less hassle. Save up to 20% off of traditional insurance today at ambroker.com slash twist. While you're there, get an extra 10% off using offer code twist. And Vanta. Compliance and security shouldn't be a deal breaker for startups to win new business. Vanta makes it easy for companies to get a stock to report fast. Twist listeners can get $1,000 off for a limited time at vanta.com slash twist. Okay, everybody, welcome to Thursdays here at SPEAKER_05: This Week in Startups. And we've started a new tradition since there are so many TV shows about tech startups that we thought we would just do our own version of recapping them. With me is Molly Wood, of course, my co-host here at This Week in Startups and my pal Lon Harris, who writes the inside.com slash streaming newsletter. He's a writer for Screen Junkies, and he's the host of Binge Boys. Welcome back to the program, Lon Harris. Thanks for having me, Jason. Great to be. That's great to have you. You did a great job last week. We're going to talk just for like 20 minutes about these TV shows. And of course, SPEAKER_11: it winds up being like an hour. So we've got a lot to say, listen, and a segment winds up being an hour and a recurring weekly. Yeah, it should be. It should be. And we now have three shows SPEAKER_13: that are on at this very moment, the same time. This feels like I went back in 10 years ago to this very podcast. When I was, we were talking, Lon, about WeWork, Uber, and of course, Theranos. SPEAKER_12: Yeah. So is it, let me just start with a simple question for you, Lon. Are these shows coming SPEAKER_19: too soon after the events that happened? I mean, I think that, you know, there's always a balance. Like there are those stories where you've got a ticking clock. The level of interest is only SPEAKER_21: going to last so long. And if you don't strike while the iron's hot, you're Joe versus Carol. I mean, I think of that as the cautionary tale. Peacock has that Tiger King scripted series right now with John Cameron Mitchell and Kate McKinnon. And nobody cares because Tiger King's over. They miss their cultural moment. So I think everybody's in that, like, you don't want to be the Adam McKay Theranos project, which is still in development now because, well, we're all in on the dropout. Maybe that's going to be it for people's interest in this story. And now you're late. So, you know, I think you might be right that we're fresh on the heels of a lot of this and we don't know maybe necessarily what all these stories are going to come to represent to us down the road. But you don't want to wait too long and risk people just losing interest in WeWork and Adam Neumann as a story. And then they're like, oh, I don't care about this. I've heard about this. SPEAKER_26: Yeah. Timing really is everything here. I mean, the Uber, that's the farthest in the past, right? Like in terms of the, is it in terms of the CEO? SPEAKER_05: I think so in terms of timing. Yeah. So maybe in terms of timing. Yeah. 2008, 2009. SPEAKER_21: Yeah. I feel like all of these were kind of living in the late aughts in the early teens. And we'll talk about We Crash. That to me feels like it's kind of a whole rush of 2010 nostalgia. Like I feel like we haven't gotten a lot of cultural. It's so recent. We haven't got a lot of cultural 2010 nostalgia, but there's a scene in We Crash where they're like, they're at a silent disco and they're dancing to Naked and Famous and M83. SPEAKER_34: And just the way it comes on at one point. SPEAKER_21: Yeah. And everybody's dressed in like rave gear and like, it's like, oh my God, this is, this is the first time I've seen them really recreate. This was 2010 in a show. SPEAKER_37: In a time. Yeah. Which is to me too soon. SPEAKER_38: Right. It feels weird to see recreations of the recent past, but especially as you get older and SPEAKER_39: time compresses, it feels more that way. What is the, what has it been traditionally? Are there other SPEAKER_42: business or, you know, crime kind of shows come to mind? What is the normal overhang for them? I'm curious. Cause this is within a couple of years of the ending of the story. Cause we're talking SPEAKER_44: about a year or two after, if you think back to the TV movie era, it was like fresh on the heels, SPEAKER_47: you know, like Amy Fisher would happen. And then the next year, every network has the Amy Fisher movie. SPEAKER_50: Right. So we're almost like peak TV is taking more time and like, but they just did the OJ trial and the Monica Lewinsky story. Right. Yeah. Ryan Murphy does those nostalgia ones where it's like, SPEAKER_53: which I enjoyed both. I'll be totally honest. I thought both of those were SPEAKER_54: entertaining to watch as a, somebody from the eighties. I don't know if, did you guys catch those? I love that OJ Simpson. The OJ Simpson one. Yeah. That one was incredible. SPEAKER_58: That is the one that I heard the most about. Yeah. Yeah. So let's get into it. SPEAKER_44: I love that one too, where they kind of, they use OJ as the jumping off point, SPEAKER_21: but it was really like that whole moment in like tabloid and celebrity culture and how that directly led into the modern era and like so many ways, it was really fascinating. Like, even like this was the birth of the Kardashians. Like this was when we first heard that name and who these people were, like all these different threads of like, this is where 2020 or 2015 media started. SPEAKER_62: Yeah. It's, it's a really amazing show for just the, the other thing that we talked about this SPEAKER_63: on the last episode, uh, last Thursday, you can look it up. We talked about just these incredible actors and all of these shows have, you know, great, uh, actors across the board. I don't know SPEAKER_42: about great performances because obviously I think material direction and editing impacts performance. Correct. Lon. SPEAKER_65: Oh, of course. I mean, it's all, it's all, you know, it's all layered on top of one another. You're just trying to pick things apart, but it's all, it's a group project. I mean, SPEAKER_67: and it's even an amazing actor with a bad script can, can an amazing actor with a bad script or a, SPEAKER_70: you know, bad direction still make something that is compelling or is it just kind of very hard? SPEAKER_21: It's hard. I mean, I think that we've definitely seen great performances in subpar projects or people who are giving 110% when maybe the material didn't call a great example. I always think back up that's popular among nerd culture is you remember that eighties masters of the universe SPEAKER_47: He-Man movie with Dolph Lundgren? Yeah, I think I do. This is not a good movie, but SPEAKER_38: Frank Langella as Skeletor, he is playing it. Like this is Shakespeare. Like he's doing a Lear in the SPEAKER_21: park. Right. He's not, he's not acting. And I mean, even more, I don't think this is a terrible movie, but even in that, that Spider-Man movie last year, Willem Dafoe is not showing up to be in a Spider-Man movie. He's showing up with the same seriousness of purpose he had playing Van Gogh or playing in Florida project or like, it's just, it's acting to him. It's Shakespeare in the park. I mean, SPEAKER_81: literally. Yeah. He's doing the same. He actually does the same thing in Aquaman too. Like he's just brings all this gravitas to Aquaman. And you're like, that guy. SPEAKER_44: Brian Cox too. You'll see Brian Cox show up in like a silly thing or in a horror movie. SPEAKER_29: And like, he doesn't happen for me. Brian Cox showed up and I was like, oh my God, this is incredible. And did you read his autobiography? I haven't read the whole thing. I read those, those excerpts that they published. SPEAKER_86: Oh, just listen to the audio book. He reads the audio book. SPEAKER_63: Of course. Yeah. It is phenomenal. And it's literally 3% about secession and 97% about theater in the sixties, seventies, eighties. I mean, he's had movies into the nineties and, SPEAKER_91: and, and just the, the stage acting in the UK. Unbelievable. SPEAKER_92: People forget how often they saw him in the, in like the nineties in films, SPEAKER_21: because he wasn't a household man. Man hunter, right? The original lector crushing that guy. He's the uncle who adopts a young William Wallace and raises him in Braveheart. But like, people don't remember that, like, where they're like, he's got to teach him Latin. And that's Brian Cox, SPEAKER_00: but he wasn't famous yet. So. He's so good. And did you ever see man hunter, Molly? The, uh, SPEAKER_70: no. Okay. So there was before, um, silence of the lambs, they did man hunter. And it is most amazing. I think it's for me, the, the best or, you know, tied for best. I have elector. SPEAKER_38: Well, it's director Michael Mann and it's Michael Mann. They redid it. It's red dragon, SPEAKER_98: the novel. So Brett Ratner remade the movie years later with Ed Norton, SPEAKER_101: but this was the original version with William Peterson. So good. So good. Okay. There's all your, SPEAKER_104: uh, preamble. That took 10 minutes just for us to get warmed up. I mean, this is why we are living in SPEAKER_106: the age of streaming. It wasn't Michael Mann's first movie. I saw that in the comments. I believe SPEAKER_87: Michael Mann had already made a few films in Miami vice. He was already coming off of Miami vice. SPEAKER_109: Right. I mean, the washed out scenes of, you know, the detectives and what, SPEAKER_63: just an incredible cast. Uh, if you haven't seen man hunter, there's my, that's my gift to you. SPEAKER_01: Listen, when you start scaling quickly, your company needs to be run professionally. And Odoo is the software that helps you maintain control of your fast running business. Odoo suite of business apps lets you run your entire company on one platform. This means you don't need to keep adding a bunch of different SAS products and paying for them and logins and data. Everything you need is already in Odoo. All you have to do is turn it on when you're ready. Odoo has over 40 main apps and over 16,000 apps from their open source community, you know, stuff like sales, SPEAKER_112: accounting, marketing, automation, HR, website builders, and so much more. Plus, if you only need SPEAKER_01: two or three apps to optimize your workflow, well, that's all you're going to pay for. Again, Odoo helps you streamline by running all your business apps on one platform. No more issues transferring data back and forth. And you'll have one customer support contact across all of your apps, not 20. So everything's going to run easier and it's going to be more affordable. Your first app, always free. And Odoo is offering right now a thousand dollar credit on your first implementation pack. Well done, Odoo. Just go to odoo.com slash twist to get that thousand dollars off. That's odoo.com slash twist. I love these thousand dollar offers. Well done, Odoo. All right. SPEAKER_70: There's three shows. I want to start with a classic F marry kill. Yep. Um, we have recrashed. We have the dropout and we have super pumped. Who are we going to kill? Molly? SPEAKER_119: Uh, I mean, I don't think this is going to come as a surprise. I'm going to kill super pumped. SPEAKER_19: Same for me, Lon. Yeah, I didn't, I mean, super pump feels the most overblown and kind of cartoonish to me. And it, it also, it's the one that's about startups exclusively in that world, instead of being SPEAKER_98: more about the people and the characters in the world and the, you know, the, the personalities, SPEAKER_87: and I'm more interested in that stuff. So of course. Yeah. Yeah. So I think now it comes to, SPEAKER_00: I guess, which one are we going to ever marry? I don't know how to play this game. We say Bob in my family, when my niece is around, we say Mary Bob kill. SPEAKER_127: Okay. Let's do that. So is it Bob Mary? Bob Mary. Now we're down to Bob or Mary. Right. SPEAKER_29: So Mary is the one you really love and Bob is the one that you're kind of like, you're enjoying it, but you could take it or leave it. Yeah. Yeah. SPEAKER_109: I mean, this is tough because I really, I thought it was polygamy. I'm marrying both. I'm going to marry both of these are pretty strong. SPEAKER_134: I'm going to live an alternative open lifestyle. Polyamory is the jam right now. I'm going polyamory. I'm marrying both. That's it. SPEAKER_136: I'm trying to think of the one that I might stop watching given like if, if I knew we weren't going to talk about this again, SPEAKER_138: I can't stop watching either. It's just too hard. No, I'm going to, I'm going to see both of these through to the end. SPEAKER_98: Now I'm, I'm, I'm hooked in enough to want to watch them. SPEAKER_68: If you could only watch one. I'm finishing super punk too, but I'm definitely going to finish these two. I might have gone back. SPEAKER_26: I feel like if I were going to stop watching one, because I am a little ruthless about TV. Jason Calacanis: I'm sort of surprised to say that it now might be the dropout. It could just because it's farther along in the story, right? That's all the way up to five episodes, farther along in the story. Now I know how it's going to play out. We've had a big emotion, you know, like the thing. I don't want to spoil it completely. Yeah. She's all the way transformed. It might be like a little less interesting to see the kind of the crash from here, but we work is still building and also the two of them together. So like, it's just so compelling. SPEAKER_63: I think, uh, one of the re the rewatch ableness of the shows is also a factor in the marrying, SPEAKER_53: if I'm correct. So if it is rewatchable, which one is more rewatchable for me? SPEAKER_00: I'm thinking, I mean, this is a hard one too, because I am so drawn to the Balwani character. Yeah. With Elizabeth Holmes, like he started to really come into his own. And I, but you know, Jared Leto and Anne Hathaway, I feel like I'm going to watch we work again. SPEAKER_153: Someday. We crashed. I don't know. This is too, we crashed rather. SPEAKER_26: Yeah. All right. Let's just get to it. All right. Anyway, none of us can just talk about them. Yeah. No, they're both, they're both really strong. Jason Calacanis: We do have at least one clear answer here, which is super pumped is not watchable long-term. It's just not, it is completely lacking in subtlety in the ways that the other two and its biggest problem is that these other two came out at the same time to show us how it should be actually done. SPEAKER_153: It is very weird that these, all three of these landed in the same month, essentially. Okay. Yeah. SPEAKER_65: It's also a super pumped is the one that we know is coming back. That's also it for like both the SPEAKER_21: dropout and we crash purely limited series. They're going to end. And that's the end. Super pumped is an anthology every season. It's going to come back and be the story of a different business, you know, rise and fall. So the season two, I think it's going to get canceled. They already picked it up. Season two is going to be Zuckerberg and yeah, share, uh, Sheryl Sandberg. Jason Calacanis: And what's interesting about that is that they essentially seem to have commissioned a book from Mike Isaac because Shira Frankel and Cecilia Kang, of course, wrote that incredible Facebook book that just came out, whose name I can't remember, but I have it on my Kindle. Um, that is among other things about that relationship. And then Mike, who is their teammate at the New York Times has apparently already been commissioned to write the same book. SPEAKER_163: Uh-oh. Because Showtime wants to make more seasons of this. Yeah. SPEAKER_167: Which is fine. Is it? It doesn't sound fine. Sounds like, uh, I think the name of that book SPEAKER_65: is an ugly truth inside. Thank you very much. I mean, they want to develop these shows from SPEAKER_21: podcasts for that exact reason, because they want to like pump multiple, they're doing the same thing. There's the slate slow burn podcast. Uh, and they've adapted the first season of that as gas lit this new show for stars, which is about the Watergate scandal. Yeah. Uh, and so, but that, SPEAKER_170: that's the same thing. Like they're hoping, oh, we can make every season of slow burn into a, you know, spinoff series. And like, it's all, everybody wants to franchise. SPEAKER_63: The bag one is being done with Ben Stiller and. Oh, Rachel Maddow. Oh, Rachel Maddow. Rachel Maddow. Yeah, yeah. SPEAKER_172: So Rachel Maddow is taking some sort of a, a break to go do this with Ben Stiller. Okay. SPEAKER_153: So let's get started. Leto Hathaway. This is the easiest place to start for sure. SPEAKER_101: Uh, and we have three episodes. We have not talked about the show yet. SPEAKER_175: Well, I mean, Nick is doing what my son did right now, by the way, which is be like, I can't believe you called him Leto. It is Leto. Leto. I'm sorry, Jared Leto. SPEAKER_178: And I was like, did everybody know this to that extent? He was so adamant about it, but apparently we're all supposed to know. It's Leto. SPEAKER_179: Duke Leto is Dune. Jared Leto is. Oh, Leto. Leto. Leto. Leto. SPEAKER_182: I knew that. Sorry. I'm just a little tired. All right. So where do we start with this? I mean, SPEAKER_186: I watched these after the first episode, I literally took out my checkbook. I wrote Adam Newman's next company in the line and I put a million dollars and I just left the date field open and signed it. And I just put it on my poster board because I was like, I, and I'm not joking. I mean, watching his relentlessness to make something out of nothing to me was, I mean, I fell in love SPEAKER_118: with Adam Newman. I literally want to throw money at him. Jason Calacanis: I like so totally thought when he first started talking and he shows up and he's so made up and he's got the accent. And I was like, this is going to be another cartoon and it's just going to be cringe-a-rama-ding-dong. And I did what I always did when I'm trying to avoid full attention. I pulled out my knitting. I was like, and then five minutes later, I put it down. I was like, what's that guy selling? It is phenomenal. And as it goes on, like in that first episode, I actually felt the like startup thrill, you know, as they're like, I was just like, I had goosebumps. I was all excited about it. I am completely buying these characters. Like Anne Hathaway's character is just, I mean, they're both, she's sort of more awful than he actually ends up seeming. He doesn't even seem that awful. I don't, I'm totally with you. Like, I'm just like, I'm buying what these people are selling. They're doing it. They're phenomenal performances. SPEAKER_65: Yeah. I think Jared Leto, he gets a lot of, he gets a lot of crap. And I think that he's often SPEAKER_21: miscast or, or misused like that, that Gucci movie. I don't, I don't know what to, I don't even know what to make of what he's doing. It's, it's a, it's a crazy performance. He's doing this wild accent. It doesn't seem remotely realistic. Uh, but when he's like well used and put in the right role, he can be really terrific. And I think that's, that is this, like the voice does take a little bit of getting used to, but, uh, yeah, I think he's, he's fantastic at this and it's the, he's the right guy for this role. He can channel that, that manic energy, that passion, that enthusiasm, that sort of like, it, it, it doesn't seem, he doesn't seem crazy, but he seems like this guy's working on, on these levels that I can't even get to. We just got like a force of nature. And I think he's really effective at coming in and you have to believe the actor, when everybody else is reacting, like, well, this guy's a force of nature, just let him do it. SPEAKER_98: You have to believe that from the performance. And I think he sells it that, oh, everybody around this guy would believe in him and would give them their money and let him go. SPEAKER_63: Which means we have to talk about Anne Hathaway next. She gives, I, I don't know if this is the best, SPEAKER_200: I don't know her whole, uh, career, but this to me seems like a peak performance for her. David Friedberg: The character, the character Rebecca Newman is layered, interesting, bitter, but also wants power and kooky. Like, I feel like I've met this person before in my life, but I could also see people not liking this performance because it could seem stereotypical of a wacky yoga person. What did SPEAKER_63: you think of Rebecca Newman over this three episode arc? SPEAKER_65: I mean, you live in Los Angeles, you meet a lot of variations of this person. SPEAKER_21: Yeah. And I'm like, you could, you could tell, I think that it's a pretty lived in natural performance because right away I was reminded of the people that I knew who were like, like, oh, I get exactly what type of person Rebecca, at that point, Rebecca Paltrow. I didn't know that, by the way, before this show. Oh, really? That she was a Paltrow family? SPEAKER_98: I had read up enough on WeWork to know about the Paltrow family connection. Oh, I knew about that. Yeah. Yeah. Uh, so that's a, that's a fun thing that they, that they play around with a lot that, uh, Rebecca Newman's father is Bob Paltrow, the brother of Bruce Paltrow, who is the father of, uh, actress Gwyneth. So it's her cousin. Her first cousin. Yeah. And, and like that, they play that. I don't know if this is realistic or not, but they play this as this has been a thing SPEAKER_25: her whole life. And she's felt like she's in the shadow of this international superstar, SPEAKER_211: Gwyneth Paltrow. Because she's also an actor, and wants to be an actor. Right. Or wanted to be an actor. Oh, you know, SPEAKER_98: it's always going to naturally, like, even when she tells her father she wants to be an actor, goes, Oh, like Gwenny, you know, well, so immediately going to be compared to, uh, SPEAKER_131: at that point already Oscar winner, Gwyneth Paltrow. Cause she won for Shakespeare in love Jason Calacanis: back in the nineties. Yes. I mean, I thought that this, when I saw the previews that seemed to rely heavily on their relationship and like, what kind of person she was and does she have any depth and what are her goals and dreams and her crying about it and stuff again, I, I, I keep going back to like, I thought this was going to be a caricature of both of them because I think I think of both of them as caricatures in the real world. And now the show has come along and made them these very big characters, right? It's not trying to tone them down in the slightest, but it's made them big and SPEAKER_95: also real. Yeah. And I think that's really an accomplishment. It's a really hard needle to thread SPEAKER_21: that if it doesn't, we crash, they've got the craziest antics. Like you could, I think you could argue Elizabeth Holmes, maybe the largest fraud, but it's hard to make the case that that story is just a zanier, bigger scale story than we work. And so they had all this material and yet they managed to still find the, the humanity in it. And not only from Adam and Rebecca, there's a great sequence right at the end of the third episode, summer camp of we crash where you're just following a lot of that story you follow from the head of comms. It's that whole, that's, it's like a bottle episode. It's all happening at this event. And there's this journalist there and all of these sort of scandalous things are happening that the journalist is writing about. They keep telling the director of comms, you got to take care of this. And then by the end of the episode, we've sort of been following it from her perspective. And it's, it's a, it's a dialogue free scene, but just of her leaving and getting into a lift and taking off from the summer camp. And it's really potent how they sort of drive that home. They do it. They do it as well from the perspective of like a young WeWork employee. I don't even think you learn her name, but you're just like track enough of her POV through the weeks or months that she's working there to get a sense of all these different perspectives. SPEAKER_98: And it's, it's really well done. And they do find the, the real human stories underneath all this SPEAKER_217: craziness that was happening. All right. I want to quickly explain to you one crucial type of insurance that every startup needs to have. And you need to know about it. It's called cyber insurance. And obviously this covers hacks, which are happening constantly. You may not hear about them all the time because people like to keep them quiet and resolve them. Well, in these crazy times, you need to be protected and you need to have cyber insurance. If you don't have business insurance, let's face it, you failed. One of the first steps of being a proper CEO and founder, especially of a company backed by investors. So startups should look no further than our friends over at Embroker. They have technology to save you time and money. Their prices are up to 20% lower and they'll give you better coverage than the incumbents. You go from signup to quote and purchase in just 10 minutes. And when you work with Embroker, instead of those slow incumbents, you're not dealing with these large lumbering corporations. Nope. Your signup takes days, not weeks, and the process is completely transparent. There's no opaque pricing. There's no wasted time. It's just easy peasy lemon squeezy. So to instantly buy custom built insurance for your startup, go to Embroker.com slash twist. And while you're there, you're going to get an extra 10% off by using the offer code twist, E M B R O K E R.com slash twist, and get that extra 10% off by using the offer code twist and that lets them know you listen to them on the show. All right, great job and broker. SPEAKER_221: I thought that was very powerful moment to as well. This young woman comes. It's SPEAKER_63: ostensibly her first job or, you know, she's very early in her career. And all of a sudden, SPEAKER_101: she's indoctrinated to doing shots constantly. And then she's got a romantic relationship at work SPEAKER_70: and they're having sex in the closet. And it's called the something closet. I can't remember. The F closet. The F closet. SPEAKER_225: All of a sudden, we're just like, we're calling it the boff closet. SPEAKER_63: Oh my God, that's going to stick. And, you know, of course, this comes to a head with, you know, millennials and Rebecca basically saying she's dedicated and women should be dedicated to SPEAKER_153: their husbands and be the women behind the men and her, you know, character now becomes an equally SPEAKER_13: driving force in this story, which I think is absolutely the case that she was an integral part of we work because Adam Neumann is driven because of this woman's love, uh, pressure, mentorship, whatever weird deranged thing they have going on in that marriage. And it hearkened back to a another film, which I want to see if one can guess where a mercurial guy SPEAKER_186: wants to create something in the world. And there is a woman behind him who is kind of whispering in SPEAKER_230: his ear. Uh, and it, uh, it's a Paul Thomas Anderson film. Oh, okay. I, I thought you were SPEAKER_95: just playing directly into Macbeth there. No, no, it should be. It, it, you remember Amy Adams? Oh, sure. In the master. In the master master. Yes. With her and Lawrence Dodd and, and, you know, how she's kind of the brains behind this, what was supposed to be sort of science. SPEAKER_221: Hoffman's amazing performance of essentially L Ron Hubbard. They don't say it explicitly because I guess they didn't want to get sued. Right. That's P.T. Anderson's thing. He does it in SPEAKER_98: licorice pizza too. There's a lot, he calls him Jack Holden, but it's supposed to be William Holden. SPEAKER_42: Ah, so in this, in the master, you know, she is driving him to create Scientology and it's their SPEAKER_70: marriage and sex and drive. And there's even the scene in, we were going to want to get graphic here, but it's a little much that scene. There's a scene where she's like, SPEAKER_00: you're the guy, you're the guy. Tell me you're the guy. And she's kind of performing an act and sexual act and trying to get him pumped up. And like, it's like, whoa, that's exact same scene is in the master. Do you remember that one? I do. I do. And did they not, when, when a writer does SPEAKER_70: something like that, number one, how do they know that that existed? That must be something that was SPEAKER_95: made by the writers. Because there was an intimate moment between the two of them. That feels like a detail that you would just add in as a writer. There's no way you, you know, nobody was in the SPEAKER_174: room. Pretty sure that was not in the book. Nick can confirm, but I don't think that was in the SPEAKER_243: book. Yeah. So I'm like, how would they ever know that moment? It feels like a very writerly detail. That's a dramatization situation. Because you're kind of trying to, like, SPEAKER_21: how do you express that? That's like an abstract kind of idea to try to get across in your writing, that like, this guy, you know, like, she is kind of the power behind this. Like, he's, she's speaking through him in some ways. And it's always because of, you know, as a woman, SPEAKER_19: she probably couldn't raise this kind of money, or she might not have felt like she was in a position to start her own company. And so she's sort of doing this work through him. And how do you show SPEAKER_247: that? You know, like, how do you, in a scene, pack that into drama? It's like, well, that's what I was SPEAKER_70: thinking the writers were doing. But does a writer know that people who've seen the master are going to SPEAKER_13: put those two things together? And it's an Easter egg? Or do you think they wrote it as like an inside reference? Or they just didn't know? How could you not know? SPEAKER_21: Oh, no. I don't think, I think whoever wrote that episode of We Crash has probably seen the master. And that's not, that's a trope. I mean, I think we've seen that in other, a woman sort of getting what she wants or motivating or getting her message across to a man by using sexuality is not limited. That's not, PTA didn't come up with that. So I think that, I think that, you know, that's, that's a trope that it just, it gets filtered through in a lot of different ways. And I think, yeah, like, if you want to show that, well, you know, she's in some ways, maybe a little smarter than him, or at least savvier than him. And she knows how to like, get this guy to do what she wants, or she knows how to like, work him. And that's one of her SPEAKER_18: strategies. She's like a Svengali in the same way. Svengal. Svengali, like, what's his name is, SPEAKER_175: um, Balwani is in, well, or he starts as, yes, that's right. I was gonna draw that same comparison Jason Calacanis: though, because both Balwani and Rebecca are portrayed as people who are sort of without their own direction. You know, Balwani is like, he's rich, but he doesn't really have a job. And he's sort of like, always trying to like, get in on what she's doing. And then Rebecca, like, wants to be an actress and has that sort of emotional scene where she's like, I can't go back to being nothing because turns out yoga is not my thing. And they're both sort of like seekers who find their direction in what their partner's doing, but also become manipulators of that direction, which is kind of interesting comparison. Yeah. It's not only gender roles. It's a threat. SPEAKER_65: No, it's not. And I mean, I think that's kind of a thread that runs through a lot of these, SPEAKER_21: all three of these shows really is like the founders in some ways inspire all these people or get what they want out of all these people because they, they see themselves. They're always reflecting people back at them. They want to see themselves in these, you know, like I'm part of this person, this exciting project or like, you know, like, and so I think that, yeah, that's definitely in play for both Rebecca Newman and Sonny Balwani and a lot of these other characters, SPEAKER_98: how they feel about these companies is often how they feel about these founders or their SPEAKER_174: relationship with the family. Right. And neither of them are normal in their own right, either Balwani or Rebecca Newman, you know, it's like, Jason Calacanis: it's because they've obviously got their own massive issues, but it is, they do a good job of giving them a little bit. I feel like Balwani is out of nuance and by episode five of the dropout. And maybe that's one of the reasons why I'm sort of like, okay, like, I know where this is going to go. And like, it's fine. Whereas I think Rebecca Newman actually still has it in we work, which again, did not expect based on the stories about I just didn't expect either of them to be such complex characters, based on the bonkersness of the stories about them. SPEAKER_200: Ultimately, when you look at the business of, or the entrepreneur, Adam Newman, it's really the SPEAKER_63: perfect case of what gets you here does not get you there. The first stage of a company, when I was looking at it through the eyes of, you know, a CEO founder myself, and also a capital allocator and watching, you know, 300 investments go through some versions of these things. He's that perfect first SPEAKER_70: stage, manifest something from nothing. And when he gets green desk up and running, and he convinces people to, you know, you're gonna, he has that scene where he's convincing the first person to buy a desk. And he's like, you're gonna, you're gonna meet your partner here, you're going to do this here, you're going to do shots here, you're going to drink, you're going to meet your wife here. That kind of manic energy to just manifest something in the world. And his salesmanship SPEAKER_13: is amazing. But then you see that he never shifts gear. And we're only three episodes into it. But by the time summer camp happens, and I remember when summer camp happened, I had multiple people tell me in the industry, like, Oh, my God, they basically ran, you know, a drug filled, insane, sex filled version of Burning Man in upstate New York. And people were like, it was awesome. But it was like part of the company. So it was a little bit weird. So I was getting all these reports back back then. And what gets you to, you know, raise that first round to get that product market fit that raw energy, enthusiasm, blind faith in your ability? Well, then you have to shift gears. And that's when you have to be like, you know what, SPEAKER_70: we probably shouldn't be drinking at work. And maybe we should pay people more. And maybe we should bring in some adults to run the place, instead of just having a bunch of kids here. And you have to have some professional management because once you get to the first second location, SPEAKER_13: you got big, big problems, you can't be running a court, there's no there's no world in which you can have a corporate version of Burning Man. It does not exist. No. Listen, when you're a founder, SPEAKER_217: it's fun to trade your crazy stories with other founders recently balloon CEO Amanda Greenberg, one of lunch is awesome portfolio founders told me how Vanta sock to solution helped her save an important deal in the final hours balloon if you don't know sell SAS productivity and collaboration software. And when they needed 10 documents in place within 48 hours to close a very important SAS deal will Vanta save the day by supplying customizable templates and helping them through the process to close. So if you don't have your sock too tight, you can't close these major customers. And Vanta is going to really help you get that done so quickly and so easily. Vanta's compliance software makes it easy to get and renew your sock to they continuously test against technical and non-technical sock to requirements. And they partner with over two dozen audit firms who have been trained to file sock to reports directly within Vanta. And on average, Vanta customers are sock to compliant in just two to four weeks. Compare that to three to five months without Vanta. And guess what? Vanta is going to give you $1,000 off right now. So get the $1,000 off at Vanta.com slash twist. Once again, Vanta V-A-N-T-A dot com slash twist for $1,000 off your sock too. SPEAKER_275: I mean, I think what one thing I think that's interesting about these three shows looking at SPEAKER_21: them together. Super pumped. It's kind of critique of TK and Uber and how he ran it was like, it was so aggressive and he was, he had this wartime posture and he was really like bending the rules or breaking SPEAKER_95: the rules to go after his competitors. Reinterpreting is what we like to use. SPEAKER_21: The other two, Wecraft and Dropout, their critiques are really more like, these founders didn't really understand the nuts and bolts of what they were doing. SPEAKER_47: They were the idea people. They were the sales people. And then once the rubber really hit the road, they were totally reliant on these people they brought in who actually knew what to do SPEAKER_21: to make the company. And I think that I don't, I don't, I'm not saying that's necessarily all true, but it's kind of an interesting, like they're all kind of condemning their founders in some ways, but it's a very different critique. Like we crashed, obviously is this notion of Newman is this brilliant salesman, you know, this like Jordan Belfort-esque, put them in front of people and he'll sell them whatever, like genius at it. But otherwise he, you know, he doesn't really get how to put the wallpaper up or that we need the desk to go here and the bathrooms to go there. Like that was all coming from Miguel and all these other people SPEAKER_98: around him. And, uh, you know, I think that it's an interesting thing that runs through the whole kind Jason Calacanis: of, it's an interesting question too, when you, you know, you bring up the idea of capital allocators, like certainly all, every question that I ever got asked as a reporter. And now even I did a CBS thing, you know, since joining launch about the Theranos trial where they're like, what does this say about Silicon Valley and its relationship with founders? I mean, that those are the eternal questions that come up as a result of these stories, which is, you know, not surprising. Um, but also it does make you wonder like, should, should there be, should this change our lens at all? SPEAKER_26: La, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la. Not listening to this. SPEAKER_285: Cause I also am pretty sure I would have given Newman money and maybe, so wouldn't, SPEAKER_140: I'm shocked to even say that because the show sold the concept of we work better than, like the stories of her niche. SPEAKER_200: I literally was talking to one of the principles, um, in one of these yesterday. David Friedberg: Uh, and I would say which show or which principle, even up to the imagination, but I know people at all of these who were investors at all of them. SPEAKER_63: Uh, and he said to me, uh, when I told him like, you know, uh, one of my observations, this person said to me like, yeah, that's exactly accurate. And then we got into a discussion of SPEAKER_70: governance. Right. And what happened here that people don't know is there was a collective moment 10 years ago in which governance in our industry. So to your point, Molly, should something SPEAKER_153: change? Something did change. We went from VCs having too much power where they could just fire somebody and they tell this in super pumped, right? They're going to remove you. You're going to lose SPEAKER_70: your company. They tell it with, uh, Balwani, Ian Gibbons, I think is the name of the scientist. Yeah. He's the, he was the chemist. Yeah. Yeah. And they start saying it there where like, and then the William H Macy character says it over and over again, they're going to remove you. Yeah. So there was this fear in the 2000s that you would get removed. Where did that come from? CEOs would get removed. And then founders fund was formed as the antithesis of Sequoia and other firms that we were going to be the founder friendly firm. And they literally put it in the name. People don't know this backstory. That's where founders fund came from. And founders fund was founded by Sean Parker, who was at a company called Plaxo. Plaxo famously, he had, you know, Sean Parker was a unique character in all the world. He's a friend of mine. And they, uh, ousted him, I believe, uh, from Plaxo. And I believe that was Sequoia. And there was this whole back and forth founders fund. Sequoia were in this big beef 20 years ago about this very issue. And then super voting shares started to become prevalent. And Facebook was one of the first to get them. And that's why Zuckerberg is in control of that company. Who was the original investor in SPEAKER_153: Facebook? Peter Thiel. Yeah. Who was backed by Sequoia. Sequoia backed, uh, Peter Thiel for PayPal. SPEAKER_63: So all of this goes back to that origin story. So when they do the anthology, Mike Isaac will take this video. Like he took my interview with TK redo it and sell it. It's fine with me. I don't care. SPEAKER_26: Uh, but so what you're saying is the thing that changed is that the Adam SPEAKER_305: Newman's and Elizabeth Holmes's and, uh, TK's of the world got more power to just run rampant. SPEAKER_309: Basically the boards. Yeah. There's no more Anthony Edwards to come in and be like, get out of SPEAKER_12: it. Super pumped about that. The boards became ceremonial. Yeah. As opposed to fiduciaries. Yeah. SPEAKER_63: What is the point of a board meeting to discuss buying Instagram or WhatsApp if SPEAKER_70: Zuckerberg just did it unilaterally in both of those cases, he just informed the boards. He was SPEAKER_63: doing this, you know, Peter Thiel on the board of Facebook, Mark Andreessen, they literally have no SPEAKER_70: say in anything. If they vote, he just goes, okay, great. Your votes count. It's like one, one thousandth of mine. So who cares what you say? Hmm. It became ceremonial. And that's what SPEAKER_153: we're seeing in this moment over the last 10 years is founders may be, uh, having too much control. SPEAKER_70: And what happens when a founder who has no experience like Elizabeth Holmes or is unqualified SPEAKER_13: to run an at scale operational business like Adam Newman, or is super aggressive and wants to win very badly and is highly effective. TK. We're looking at those three different scenarios of founders. SPEAKER_70: They're not the same founder. Yeah. You know, like two of them are unqualified. One of them's hyper-qualified, you know, and, and, and, but this is what happens when there's no reins or checks and SPEAKER_153: balances. And that's what, you know, we've talked about a lot on VC Sunday School Molly. So why do these boards exist and what is good at governance? And I'm sure we'll talk about it more in relation to all this, but this is why governance is becoming more important, especially when people put a lot of money SPEAKER_81: behind people with less experience. It is really interesting though. Cause what you're describing Jason Calacanis: is that we, we had these experiences with these three founders. Yep. And many more people were harmed or people lost a lot of money or, you know, businesses had to change dramatically or made a lot SPEAKER_26: of money and that our response or, or both, right? All those things are true all at the same time. And so making a lot of money is excusing a lot of these sins, but, but what you're saying is like, now we're in a situation where it, where, as that was happening, then founders got a whole bunch more SPEAKER_136: power. So probably it's just going to happen all over again. Well, that was, that was p on some SPEAKER_63: level. That was giving away of power. Yeah. And now I think what we'll see is some return to normalcy. SPEAKER_70: Kind of maybe go back to the middle a little bit and maybe we'll forever. And it will never be as SPEAKER_153: crazy as it was with VCs being able to just boost founders who own five or 10%. And founders felt like they were, you know, they're at the behest of whatever the VCs wanted. But I don't think it's SPEAKER_221: going to be founders can do whatever they want. And the board is ceremonial. So we'll start to see a SPEAKER_21: little bit of that. Is this crypto and web three next? I mean, in 2020, are we, are we watching the shows about like the board, a rise and fall? And like, that's, that's what's coming down the road? SPEAKER_62: Yeah, those will be 100 times more insane because those people will be going Vegas SPEAKER_70: party blowout sequences. Money laundering. And yes, you know, people from terrorist organizations or organized crime, flipping stuff. It's, you know, it's gonna start developing Chinese government, Russian government, money, dark money pools, and all that kind of gnarly stuff. Because SPEAKER_153: when you run money as the operating system of these things, and it's dark money, you know, all kinds of a whole nother level of things happens that doesn't exist here. SPEAKER_231: We've been waiting. That NFT series is going to have to go to showtime. You're not SPEAKER_178: even going to be able to put that on regular TV. I thought somebody picked this up. Somebody picked up a version of this, I thought, with that Silk Road book that Nick built. SPEAKER_65: Yeah, that's something that's optioned. Yeah. Well, that you could write. I could see that like the SPEAKER_21: early, you know, like the dark web stuff and like how that sort of, and so that's its own kind of story. I just feel like to me, this feels like, yeah, the current era of tech that's going to inspire the shows in 10 years is all going to be 100%. And then that's going to be that is going SPEAKER_26: to fall into the super pumped category of storytelling, where it's a little bit tricky Jason Calacanis: because it probably won't be that. I mean, there are some personalities here. Don't get me wrong. Yeah, AirPods, AirPods. Well, AirPods, um, SPEAKER_63: episode five, flower of life. With the wall, I'll just read the description with the Walgreens deadline looming Elizabeth and sending scramble to find solutions to their technology failures. SPEAKER_221: Ian is drawing into Elizabeth's lawsuit against Richard. Felt like another great episode to me. I was riveted by the whole thing. What did you guys think? SPEAKER_21: Yeah, I think Stephen Fry gets his, I think obviously, uh, Amanda Seyfried, fantastic, killing it, watching her sort of development over the course of the series. I also feel like Stephen SPEAKER_233: Fry is doing incredible work here. Probably. I feel like he's getting his supporting actor, Emmy nod for this. I mean, he's got to, he has absolutely got to. Yeah. He was really fantastic. Jason Calacanis: It felt to me like this episode is like the emotional climax. I don't want to give too much SPEAKER_63: away for people. For anybody who's listening now, and I'm going to give a little warning at the top of the show. Spoiler heavy. We're going to talk about everything when we do this. So you can save the show and come back to it after you watch the episode. But yes, you can talk about everything. Jason Calacanis: Okay. All right. Well, it is the emotional climax and it is the part where like some avoidance comes in because, you know, if you are familiar with this story, you know, that this person died in real life. He kills himself. Yeah. Yeah. He kills himself and the show, you know, more even than like the books have danced around it. The, some of the legal cases have danced around it. I, the show like SPEAKER_136: draws a one-to-one like there knows killed this guy and the pressure of the lawsuit intense. SPEAKER_21: Knowing that, well, he would either have, if he testified, Theranos would come after him for violating his, his NDA. But if he didn't, he would be perjuring himself. You know, he felt like he was completely trapped in this situation. Yeah. And I don't think he was trapped SPEAKER_70: in the situation. When I was thinking through it, I was like, I don't think this is the end of his SPEAKER_63: career if he testified against them because he would be forced to do so. And I think he would find SPEAKER_70: another job. So I felt that was a little unbelievable and a bit of a construct. And that's why I think like, maybe we don't know exactly what happened and maybe the show is making a jump that maybe the reason other people weren't willing to make the jump of the one-to-one Molly. Yep. That Elizabeth killed him by these lawsuits. Right. We don't know. It's because they don't actually know. And that maybe the person did have an alcohol problem. It's unclear, but the show makes it one-to-one cause and effect. If not for these lawsuits, which are based upon Elizabeth lying on the patents, he would not have felt the pressure and they build SPEAKER_26: it up. Yeah. And to be clear, that's all I'm like, I was surprised at the degree to which the show Jason Calacanis: was like, this is the deal. Like this is the progression and it's incontrovertible. SPEAKER_354: They're making it a narrative. Like this is over time, this is what drove him to this point. SPEAKER_26: Exactly. And then at that point, I think because it's the emotional climax and this happens and they Jason Calacanis: have made this narrative so plain, this is also the episode in which all of your sympathy, all of your sense of nuance that you might have built up about Sonny and Elizabeth is like gone. SPEAKER_21: Yes. It's gone. Well, I, I mean, yeah, I think we got that, that scene of her sort of transitioning fully into the dark side where she adopts the, the, the voice that we're all familiar with. Uh, and she, you know, she makes this formal decision to, we're going to break apart the Siemens machine and we're going to figure out how that works and basically steal their technology to fake our technology. Uh, and so I think once we cleared that hurdle, yeah, that, that's it. SPEAKER_98: Now the, the, the transition is over and we're fully into being, uh, you know, being a fraud. SPEAKER_63: Uh, so yeah, we have the, which is exactly, by the way, from my understanding of it, and I've had John Kerry Rue on this program early on, uh, and the John Kerry Rue, Wall Street Journal, um, uh, investigative journalist shows up in this episode and he's great as well. And I thought that was played perfectly. I'm not sure by who, but it was very SPEAKER_153: well done. And that is really, I think that the next part of this is the unraveling of it. So this is kind of the peak of Elizabeth story in terms of turning to the dark side, uh, Balwani being kind of her, um, the emperor in this kind of pushing her along to do this, uh, where he's like, I already broke the machine open. I did it already. He's like, you're halfway there. SPEAKER_365: Thank you for the permission. Thanks for the permission. SPEAKER_182: I, you know, preceded your fraud. SPEAKER_19: I do think one thing that's interesting that they're doing very specifically the show is that SPEAKER_21: they're showing her like how, like how influenced, how, how malleable Elizabeth Holmes was and how easily manipulated she was by older people in her life that she looked up to, not only Sonny, but there's that, that crucial scene with her mom, uh, where she's, What would you do? SPEAKER_98: Floating the idea of, I want to quit. I don't want to do this anymore. I can't do it. And her mom is like, no, you have, you have to, and basically like, I won't be proud of you anymore if you stop doing this. Uh, and so, you know, it's, it's interesting. They keep drawing those parallels to like, she kind of saw that she was going too far, but she was listening to all of these mentors or all of these authority figures or what she saw as authority figures in her life. SPEAKER_26: And there is a way to have, there is a way to see that sympathetically. Right. Cause you're like, she is sort of pushed around by these people or she, what you realize is how freaking young she is. SPEAKER_370: Right. That's what they're kind of driving home in those. SPEAKER_371: Exactly. Like she's a person in her early twenties, you know, this is her first real job. SPEAKER_26: Yeah. She didn't even finish, you know, she barely went through any college, any of the part where you just like, even have the moment of like moldy dishes in the sink. And you're like, oh, wow. I really have to get my shit together. Right. She doesn't have any of Jason Calacanis: that development. Right. She clearly has these parents. And I, this is why I love the, the kind of recurring character of the mom and how awful she is. SPEAKER_163: Yeah. Elizabeth Marvel is the mom and she's really, she's doing a great job. Jason Calacanis: She's doing a great job and you can sort of see why this girl would be like, oh, I got nothing SPEAKER_05: without the approval of these people. Basically, she floats the idea of leaving the mob. She floats SPEAKER_63: the idea of leaving the Jedi order or, you know, you know, leaving the galaxy and just, you know, going and being a hermit somewhere. And people are like, no, that's not possible. Balwan is like, what do you, what do you mean? Like, we just quit. Like, no, she's like, literally basically, like, we should just shut down Theranos 150 million in. Yeah. I don't know if that actually happened or not, but I thought that was a nice editorial flare or device that she actually looked SPEAKER_186: for a way out. And I was like, you know, I'm in too deep. I do think to Molly's point, SPEAKER_21: I think that's, that's an attempt to keep some shred of humanity. So we can keep viewing her as like, she's not a monster. She wasn't out here trying to kill people. Right. She just felt trapped. Like, this kept snowballing, almost like a character in like a film noir. Like you tell one lie or double indemnity, you know, you know, one lie turns into two lies and now all of a sudden you're buried and you have to keep digging yourself in deeper and there's no way out. Yeah. SPEAKER_221: Uh, it, it is, uh, a fantastic episode, I think. Um, but I'm wondering if this is the peak of the show SPEAKER_153: or not, because I guess it's going to end with the trial and the guilty, right? And then they will have absolutely, there should be a followup to this in five or 10 years when we see what happens. And then I, what I'm wondering about with all these anthology shows is the crossover. And I realized this has universal potential because in we work, when the lift shows up SPEAKER_137: to pick her up, I was like, okay, so now we go to the founder story and we like to like the founder, uh, or like bill Gurley, you know, and benchmark were all, well, not bill Gurley, but benchmark was also an investor in we work. So you could start to see these stories crossover, SPEAKER_186: which is what I think the Brian compliment anthology, Mike Isaacson story is going to try to do is when they tell the Facebook story, they could have a meeting. They can have those people show up. SPEAKER_98: I think that's the smart way to do it. They'll probably will try to have some kind of crossover SPEAKER_174: or keep it consistent. Listen, like, I'm not trying to be a jerk, but they're going to need new writers. If they want to try to achieve the subtlety of a multiverse within this showtime SPEAKER_200: situation. I just want to see absolutely. Uh, there's a famous story of Adam Neumann pitching SPEAKER_201: Elon about we work on Mars. And if that, if that makes it into the show, that'll be next level. SPEAKER_397: But what I want to see is, I don't know if I've seen the casting note. I don't know. SPEAKER_26: I asked Miguel McKelvey about that. Actually, like he was giving me this sort of we everywhere Jason Calacanis: pitch. And I said, I was like, you mean like what? I was like, where does this go? We Mars? And he's like, um, actually we have a picture in the office of like the surface of Mars, which by the way, side note of when we look at these and it's people that, you know, when we look SPEAKER_26: at these shows in the real world universe, like if Bill Gurley is getting the derpy derp treatment by super pumped or Miguel McKelvey has got to be horrified at his portrayal here because he is such a sharp guy. He, it really, and they nod to this, but had a lot of these business ideas and he is being portrayed as just like the biggest doofus. Yeah. Just like, I do think that he's such like a SPEAKER_19: follower. Like when they first introduced that character, you don't think this is going to be the co-founder of we work. It's, it's kind of just like this doofus that he sort of like SPEAKER_70: keeps around to do the, the, the hard stuff. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Or menial stuff, whatever it is. SPEAKER_153: Yeah. It did not feel on track. Uh, but the quote was, uh, Adam Newman once argued to Elon Musk SPEAKER_70: that getting to Mars would be easy, but building community there was the hard part. SPEAKER_409: I mean, no, I think getting to Mars is actually the hard part. Like like defeated gravity. And if they didn't write that scene in, they're going to be kicking SPEAKER_347: themselves. Cause what a fun scene to write and shoot. I'm lighting a candle that they can SPEAKER_236: figure out how to get it already. I want to see the dinner party where SPEAKER_63: Rebecca Newman gets sat next to Balwani. And it's just like a dinner party in Silicon Valley David Friedberg: with eight people. And they just happen to be at other end of the table. And maybe they talk, SPEAKER_200: maybe they don't, but that's my crossover universe. So to whoever's producing it's Hulu. And then who's doing, are they both Hulu? What's we know? Apple app. We crashed as Apple. SPEAKER_26: We were doomed because we have Hulu, Apple and Showtime. SPEAKER_415: Yeah. They're all, everybody, everybody wants to have their own startup show. SPEAKER_63: We can fix this. We can fix this. We can fix this. This is a message to Hulu and Apple. You will have to be like Marvel and DC would do every 10 years, like a little crossover, uh, comic book with it, have a, you know, different universes collide in a what if SPEAKER_153: kind of scenario. You have to collide these shows. You have to, because they're so well done. Jared Leto. Yeah. SPEAKER_290: And, uh, Amanda. Opposite Amanda Seyfried. Like I want to see that scene. SPEAKER_70: Oh my Lord. If they met him, just have them meet at a cocktail party and have a 15 minute SPEAKER_13: conversation. The whole thing would blow up. So somebody clipped this message and sent to SPEAKER_70: whoever's running Apple TV. And then one of you people from CIA or Endeavor CC, SPEAKER_250: the person, it's so easy to do the post-credit scene, you know, like the Nick Fury post-credit SPEAKER_38: where it's like the next VC and they're in their office and they're like, we work set up a meeting. SPEAKER_21: And then they're like, Oh, who was that? You know, which, which VC was that benchmark? SPEAKER_426: Was that Sequoia? SPEAKER_424: Antonio's nut house and the Robin who guys pitched me as a stinger. Yeah. Tell me again, what happens with Robin hood? You give the trades for free. SPEAKER_13: Next scene. Yeah. SPEAKER_153: Let's end on this. The best scene from each of these two shows up to date, or, you know, from the last episodes, the best scene for you, we had the summer camp episode. Okay. Be for any of the three, but any of the three we crashed. And then, uh, from the dropout, the last episode, number five, the Walgreens episode, what is the best moment or scene for you? I'll kick us off SPEAKER_200: for me in the dropout, the scene where Elizabeth Holmes puts the mask of herself on and they start dancing when they get back to their apartment. Right. Was the most deranged serial killer thing SPEAKER_00: I've seen on television in a long time. I was just like, keep that woman away from any control or power of anything ever again. Like, do not let her near a steering wheel. Do not let her near like the cockpit David Friedberg: of a plane. Like she will crash whatever you put her in front of. And like, that mask was so weird looking that I literally felt like a cold chill, like Hannibal Lecter type moment. SPEAKER_95: What moment do you guys have? There's a great moment. There's a great opening of one of the SPEAKER_21: episodes of, of we crashed. I think it's episode three. I'm pretty sure it's the most recent one. Uh, and it's, they're playing it's, it's, uh, MGMTs faded to pretend is the needle drop on this object. Again, we're in pure early teens, nostalgia territory. And it's just that we're following this young woman and it's her first days of work and she's hearing Adam Neumann on, they have these, uh, TGI Monday parties where it's Monday cause they're celebrating the work week and they're drinking and you just cut and it's, it's very cinematic. It's you're cutting from taking shots. She's making out with dudes in this closet. She's at her desk, falling asleep. He's getting Newman's t-shirt cannons. It's really well done. And it, it, it, it so quickly, and I've been in startup scenarios like that and, and rooms like that in my day. And it really does capture that SPEAKER_19: really frothy early enthusiasm when it feels like when you say rooms, you mean closets or just rooms? SPEAKER_441: I mean, like, let me know a variety of spaces, warehouse type, open office spaces, let's leave it at that. Uh, but like, I, I really, it really captures it and how quickly this can spiral out of SPEAKER_21: control. If there's nobody at the helm and how, like, if you're just focused on scale and excitement and community and not any of the responsibility stuff, how this spirals so quickly out of control. I thought in one sequence to just pack it all in. And I feel like by the end, you kind of get what's wrong with we work so that later when Rebecca Newman's in this tent and she's being confronted, it doesn't feel like these complaints are coming out of nowhere to us. SPEAKER_98: We're like, Oh, of course, of course, we've seen how this went. SPEAKER_163: Molly, what are you, what's your favorite scene as we ran? Yeah, I, you know what? I'm a little bummed. Cause I agree. I thought that was so well done SPEAKER_26: in terms of showing the, the, the impact of what he was building. Right. So like up to that moment, we've had these, and there were a million incredible, I mean, obviously, of course, Jason Calacanis: the scene when he comes in defense or to the yoga teacher, and you're like, that's the moment where he goes from sort of cartoon to badass. Like you see his sort of badass potential in that moment, like, Oh, okay. He actually is not a joke. He is a person who can be taken seriously and has good business instincts. But I loved the broadening of the story in that exact moment through the eyes of that employee, where you're just like, this has an impact on other people. And now we see the impact on those other people in such a like real visceral and also just cool TV kind of way. Totally. I will SPEAKER_95: also add in episode two, and Hathaway is called on to do what's gotta be a tough thing for a good actor, which is to give a very bad acting performance in a Chekhov play where she's doing this ridiculous Russian accent. And it's been occasional reminders that and Hathaway is actually SPEAKER_98: very funny and became famous for doing comedies first before she was famous as a dramatic actor. Jason Calacanis: I mean, that whole hilarious subplot of her getting this movie, you know, this theater director in SPEAKER_26: there promising the space, flaming out being humiliated, and then being like, I guess we just won't be able to use the space anymore. It's just sort of a, like, there's just good SPEAKER_63: happening in that show. Well, this peak narcissism that moment, right? Like her narcissism comes through SPEAKER_200: along with his and narcissism, confidence, fake it till you make it is one of the aspects of startups that, you know, you, we, you do have to contend with, um, I, for me in the, uh, in the, we crashed SPEAKER_63: the best moment or another best moment. Cause I do think the montage, the point you guys point out were great too, but there was a great moment, I think for Anne Hathaway's character. And I think she's SPEAKER_13: still in the show, um, where she's dealing with her dad and the judge, the judge forces the dad to say, so that makes you a, you did something fraudulent. So you're a, and he's just trying to get this guy who's a total fraud. Her father's a fraud to just say he's a fraud. And then her dad had poured this incredible bottle of wine with her and said, yeah, I bought it at an auction or something. And then she peels back the label of the same bottle of wine. And her dad was even lying to her at that very point in time about the bottle of fine wine. He was serving to his daughter. That's what a fraud is, is that he has to be a fraud to his daughter. And then her dad and her husband are both frauds maybe. And her contending with that and her childhood and her SPEAKER_63: trauma, I think really explained her character in a way that I just did not expect. It was a level of depth to her character that I thought was in a way almost beautiful that you could kind of SPEAKER_200: like have sympathy for her because all she's ever known is a bunch of guys around who are frauds. SPEAKER_00: And she's somehow reliving her relationship with her dad, with Adam. And her dad was telling her Adam's a fraud, didn't know what he's doing. And it turns out her dad is the fraud. I didn't see it Jason Calacanis: coming. I mean, the like fragility that she gets out of this show because, because there's narcissism and narcissists. Sure. They get prickly and crazy when they're challenged, but a lot of times they double down. And there's something about her fragility that is really like, it's really profound. This is a really good show. Whereas Elizabeth Holmes has now evaporated for me. I'm still super SPEAKER_65: interested in Rebecca and Adam. That actor, Peter Jacobson plays Bob Paltrow in this. He was all, he's been, you've seen him and he was in House and like, he's been in everything. SPEAKER_465: Great character actor. The Americans. And yeah, he's really, he's also really nice. Love the Americans. So good. Okay. Listen, we did an hour. You were supposed to be 20, but we geeked out. SPEAKER_137: You're amazing. Can we get Lana a parting gift? Can we send him an ember mug, please? SPEAKER_467: Get this kid an ember mug. He's now part of the crew. We'll see you all next time. Bye bye. Bye. SPEAKER_469: Hey everyone. Producer Nick here. I want to tell you about the SAS syndicate. If you're a founder of a SAS company with a product and market, our investment team wants to talk to you. Head over to the syndicate.com slash SAS, S A A S to apply to raise from the SAS syndicate. And you can join Jason syndicate of over 9,000 accredited investors at the syndicate.com SPEAKER_472: Producer Justin here. No cool startup. Check out open scouting.com where anyone can refer a startup to our investment team here at launch. Even if you don't know the founder, if you're the first to flag a company for us and we decide to invest, you'll get 5k in cash or 10% of our carry. SPEAKER_02: Hey everybody. Producer Rachel here. Are you an early stage startup that has product and market, some traction, and are looking to raise at least $500,000? Apply today to remote demo day for your chance to pitch to over 9,000 investors in Jason syndicate. Submit your application at remotedemoday.com. Our next event is on April 27th. SPEAKER_469: And if you want to learn how to invest in startups from the world's greatest angel investor, and no, we're not talking about Chris Saka, then head to angel.university to apply. The four hour workshop costs $300 and all proceeds are donated to charity. To date, we've donated over $175,000 to various charities, and you can see the full list at angel.university slash charity.