SPEAKER_00: Hello, everybody. Welcome back to Twist. This is Alex. Today, we want to answer a very important question, which is, when will OpenClaw go mainstream? Now, if you've been watching the show lately, you know we're all in on OpenClaw. But for mainstream consumers, it's just too technical still. Most people are not able to use it. Think about your parents or your friends that are outside the tech world. But we think that the first consumer app to truly bring OpenClaw into the mainstream will become a unicorn. The question is, what's that going to look like? Is it an app? Is it built into your phone? And how much does the average consumer actually care about security in the way that we talk about it, if it just works? So to help us understand consumer adoption and to give us some tactical and practical demos, please join me in welcoming our guest today. We have Matthew Berman. Matthew is a well-known YouTuber with hundreds of thousands of subscribers diving deep into how the average person can use OpenClaw today. Matt, welcome to the show. Thank you, Alex. Good to be here. Then we have Ryan Ionelli, the founder of NextVisit. He won our recent gamma pitch competition, so he might look familiar to you. NextVie is an AI-powered clinical documentation platform for psychiatrists. You can kind of imagine how agentic automation might play in there. Ryan, welcome back. Thank you for having me again. And calling in all the way from Europe, it's Jason Grant, the founder of Massive, a company that I covered their funding round back in the day, as it turns out. Massive helps companies gather public data from around the world, which they can then bring to bear on their own AI use case. And he recently launched something called ClawPod that we're going to talk about. Jason, welcome to the show. Great to be here. Thanks for having me. I'm so excited to have you all here because I have been spending my time deep in the OpenClaw mines, burning tokens, and basically trashing my family's finances. But we're going to start with the average person today. We're going to talk about going mainstream. So there's conversation about how if OpenClaw was appified, if you will, it would immediately shoot to the top of the app store and everyone would love to do it. But it still feels to me that OpenClaw is far too complicated for the average person to set up. So Matt, you've been doing a lot of work helping people understand this. Where's the average person in terms of readiness

SPEAKER_08: to adopt OpenClaw and what's holding them back? I don't think it's quite there. I think this is really a tinkerer's dream right now. You have to install it locally. You're still trying to iterate

SPEAKER_10: rapidly, figure out what works, what doesn't work. There's still so much discovery. But for the average person that just wants a one-click install and everything to just work, it's not quite there yet. I think Google actually probably has the biggest opportunity to do this right. They have all the data. They have so many different services that they offer with Gmail and Calendar and Drive. And if they just continued to push forward as they have been and maybe even take a little bit of

SPEAKER_11: the red tape off and allow you to plug in your different services, I think they would probably

SPEAKER_14: be able to deliver something incredible. But the security concerns wouldn't be solved just by having access to all that information. So do you think that Google has the will to actually go forth and build something that forward-looking? Or are they more conservative and therefore going to

SPEAKER_10: wait for someone else to take the baton? If you asked me that 18 months ago, I would have said they're not going to be able to get out of their way. But now looking at just how far the Gemini series of models have come, how deeply integrated it is into every single product and service that they offer, I do think there's an opportunity there. Obviously, being a multi-trillion dollar public company, they have to think about the security. And there are still a lot of security issues. Now, the thing about that is if you're plugging in a bunch of different Google services and it's all within their cloud, they probably can lock down that security pretty well. But then you're very limited in what you can do with a one-click OpenClaw type system. So you still need to connect other services. And I still do think Google can do it.

SPEAKER_14: Yeah. Jason, the mobile comment is very interesting to me because when I think about my phone, I'm an iPhone guy. I guess I should admit that up top here. It's amazing how the AI world seems to have absolutely missed the operating system layer. And instead, it's occasionally an app that I pull over my phone. But if you think about it, given what we can now do with OpenClaw on our computers, it feels really backwards to me. Am I being too impatient?

SPEAKER_20: I mean, first of all, I think the people that have adopted this, there's a lot of really vocal early adopters. And we've been speaking with people that use ClawPod and they're super excited

SPEAKER_23: to be testing stuff out. And this is a very small group of people who are very loud, who are like hobbyists, a lot of small business owners, a lot of people who help businesses set up workflows. And then some, you know, some people in tech to pay in on how much work they have with their kind of normal jobs. I don't think your background, like backward personally, I mean, we're seeing or if you've been claw pilled, as I guess you guys are saying here, we're seeing that all you need to do is give your machine a set of instructions. We don't need this whole layer of UI, bloated apps, different types of weird experiences as a user anymore. I just want to have stuff run, have context from wherever I stored some information and then do something because it

SPEAKER_24: has access to do something else. I don't need to click into or have a screen full of hundreds of apps that I can't find any app. I don't need a thousand tabs open on my computer. I don't need another thousand apps that I'm installing on my computer and I'm dealing with this. All I need is really, you know, a skill that says what to do and gives me access.

SPEAKER_14: Ryan, do you think we're going to get there at the OS level or do you think that applications will for the now, for the next, I don't know, say six or 12 months maintain their kind of preeminence on the consumer side as we consider agentic automation, Viz, OpenClaw, and it's other tools out there that are related?

SPEAKER_28: It's, I think a lot of it's just going to be app-based and like for now. It's just, I see OpenClaw giving people that didn't have access to a tool or workflow utility before to have access to AI and these complicated tools and kind of give them that simple interface, although it's not simple yet to set up.

SPEAKER_14: On the setup point though, Matt, so one thing that you do on your channel that I really like is you break down kind of like what people can do with OpenClaw, kind of giving them a blueprint for getting started and getting set up. When you talk to people out there who are watching your stuff, where do they get stuck going from, okay, I want to try this out. I've heard about it too. I can't quite make it work. Where do they, where's the, where's the falling down point?

SPEAKER_10: If you actually, I actually think the falling down is kind of discovering the use cases that make sense for their life. That's why I've, I've been just exploring so many different use cases, trying to document them, trying to put them out there. People kind of understand the gist of how this works. You have a telegram or a WhatsApp personal assistant built in, uh, stored locally on your computer. You can do anything with it, but what is that anything? And I think like discovering what those actual use cases are, those are the questions that I personally get all the time, not only from folks who watch my videos, but also my friends who are technical enough to get

SPEAKER_39: this installed. I see. And what percentage of your friends do you think are technical enough to get

SPEAKER_10: this installed? Just if you had to put a number on it for fun. Uh, 10% and, and it, you know, when quote unquote normies, I don't, I don't think it's quite ready for them yet. Again, like if you can, if you can vibe code, if you are decent at vibe coding, you can absolutely use open claw. Uh, but I think for the vast majority of people, it's not, it's not ready yet.

SPEAKER_42: Yeah, I agree with that. Jason, uh, if you had to put a guess on how many of your friends

SPEAKER_14: could set up open claw today, uh, friends thinking broadly, not just your tech friends, but just your social circle, what percent could pull it off without you swooping in to save the day

SPEAKER_24: and help them out? I'm running a pretty high velocity startup right now. The amount of time I'm

SPEAKER_45: catching up with friends is limited these days. I did assume you still had friends. I should have

SPEAKER_48: known better than asking the founder. I have them somewhere. Um, pretty small. I mean, some people

SPEAKER_49: will mention it here and there as I'm, you know, we have catch up conversations, but it's a really

SPEAKER_23: small percentage outside of, you know, techie founder type friends. Yeah. Yeah. Ryan, back to

SPEAKER_51: your point about, you know, sticking with apps for a while, probably for the consumer. Uh, do you think

SPEAKER_14: that the, an appified open claw on say a mobile device would be useful given the way mobile operating systems are set up today? Because the way that I think about iOS, for example, is that it's, it's so locked down that you couldn't actually probably ape what we can do with open claw on PCs on mobile

SPEAKER_51: today. But I just want to kind of vet that against your views here. Launch is a fast growing

SPEAKER_53: organization. We've got more than a dozen employees working with me here in Austin and another dozen spread out all over the world. But there's so many moving parts when it comes to hiring and managing employees. There's the onboarding, of course, payroll, you got to pay them. And listen, I've got all these podcasts to do. I don't have time for payroll benefits, HR taxes, answering questions, nor do I want to hire a full-time person and then have them do five hours of work a week. No, I have the perfect partner, Gusto. They're the all in one payroll and benefit product that's built just for your small business. Easy to use. It's incredibly fast to get started. And it's designed specifically with remote offices in mind. And Gusto is not just giving you helpful tools. They're going that extra mile to keep your workers happy and keep everything running smoothly. And they're now offering level funded health plans to keep your insurance costs down and on-demand pay to help workers get access to their cash faster without paying extra interest or hidden fees. So here's your call to action. We want you to try Gusto today. So we're giving you three months free when you run your first payroll. That's right. Three months free. F-R-E-E. That's my favorite price, folks. Go to gusto.com slash twist. That's Gusto. G-U-S-T-O.com slash twist. What an amazing service and a partner. Great partner. I think that if OpenClaw was in the

SPEAKER_28: form of an app where the use cases for how it's going to be used by the average consumer are defined kind of like what Matt said before, it's going to make it easier for a consumer to say, oh, okay, I see why I need this. And it's going to come down to, I think, like, whoever is running that platform on

SPEAKER_62: the back end, like Google or Anthropic, whoever it might be.

SPEAKER_63: Okay. Well, we'll have to see how that works out. But one thing I did see is that over on

SPEAKER_14: Polymarket, there is people betting on this. And the reason why I'm so curious about the app side of this is there was a moment when people thought that I think an OpenClaw-ish app would come to market and knock, finally, ChatGPT out of the top of the app store. And lately, we've seen those numbers absolutely drop. If you're on the audio version of this, essentially, the number of people who think that ChatGPT will lose its top spotters, dropping by double-digit percentage points. So to me, this implies that we're not going to have a good app version of it, which means that consumer adoption will remain slow. And this is going to stay kind of a tech product for the foreseeable

SPEAKER_67: future. But Jason, please. This will be a breakout success as soon as it solves a painful, either it solves a painful enough problem for people to go through the steps of setting up and get over security

SPEAKER_24: risks. And that's converging on it, becoming very easy to have your instance set up or have it set up on whatever device you want. So it's going to get both easier to implement this, but there needs to be a killer use case that brings us into the mainstream because, and by the way, because of my background, very security concern. When this came out, I immediately flagged to everyone in the company, do not install this on any work machines like the day I saw it, because I knew there would be

SPEAKER_20: so much temptation. We're going to get to the Wired article in a second, I promise. But yeah, but what I'm saying is that, yeah, I think users have thrown away their security because something solves a pain point for decades now. It's a huge problem that we all see. And so

SPEAKER_23: I think the use case is going to be really what brings us to the mainstream.

SPEAKER_14: I feel like we're getting really close to crypto territory here. Like, what is the use case for this awesome, cool new technology? What do you think that use case, that killer use case will be Matt? And do you think we know what it is yet?

SPEAKER_10: Yeah. I want to just actually point out Manus, Manus AI acquired by Meta. That is the reason that Meta acquired Manus. That is essentially kind of the fully hosted version of OpenClaw, right? And didn't Manus at a certain point reach pretty high up in the App Store rankings?

SPEAKER_14: I don't recall. It's actually, it's App Store rankings progression, but for folks listening, Manus was a Chinese AI company, moved to, I think it's Singapore to redomicile. And then Meta bought it for $2 billion. Matt, back me up here in the last month, month and a half.

SPEAKER_10: Yeah. Very recently. And I think the point is like, if you look at what Manus is capable of, and when Manus first came out, it's a lot. It's kind of, that's a very akin to what OpenClaw is able to do. OpenClaw is obviously much more configurable now because it's not fully cloud-based, but I think that's Meta's plan with it. So I just wanted to bring that point back for a second. And yeah, Manus just looks like it could be maybe that first breakout OpenClaw version.

SPEAKER_83: Manus though, was, if memory serves, aimed at the SMB market. So aimed at small businesses versus

SPEAKER_14: consumers. And when I think about mainstream, to me, that does imply consumer map more so than,

SPEAKER_39: I don't know, your average kind of mom and pop or brick and mortar.

SPEAKER_10: Yeah. I actually, I think that's a really good distinction. Are we talking about personal AI assistants or are we talking about AI assistants that can get knowledge work done? For me right now, OpenClaw is doing both, which is wonderful. Manus, yes, it was much more focused on the knowledge work use case, but I think now that they've been acquired by Meta, it's much more likely that they're going to be able to service both parts of that market.

SPEAKER_14: Okay. But back to the question about what the breakout consumer use case is going to be, to Jason's point, if you had to pick like a top three thing that, or top three things that someone outside of our technology bubble would want to do with it or get value from, what do you think those are?

SPEAKER_10: As soon as, as soon as these systems can actually get real world tasks done consistently, that's probably going to be it. I know that's not necessarily what you're asking. You're asking for a very specific use case. I guess the short answer is I'm not exactly sure what that's going to be. It's probably going to be determined by what everybody needs in the moment. I think one that just comes to mind immediately is I have just complete notification overload at all times. If I had a system that was a buffer between me and all of the information that I'm getting from email, from Slack, from everywhere. And these are personal use cases. And then can maybe even triage some of those things for me, that would be an incredible time saver and maybe something broadly applicable.

SPEAKER_63: Do you think the average person has so many notifications and inbound communications that they need that? Because you ever like look at your partner's email and they've got like four that

SPEAKER_10: day and you're like, oh, we live in different worlds. Yeah. But then you think about Instagram and Facebook and X and like it doesn't just come from email. It comes from everywhere and people are scrolling like crazy. I just think there's so much noise right now. The ability to actually filter some of the noise. Plus when AI creates so much more noise because you can create any image, any video, and then all of a sudden you need your own AI to filter all the noise coming through and only give you the signal. I think that's going to be a killer use case. All right. So on the use case front,

SPEAKER_14: Ryan, you sent over some notes about what you're actually using OpenClaw for. And I'm just going to list out a couple of things that you mentioned to us. So start of the, end of the day accountability, agent for yourself and your staff, business focused, not to consumer, but very cool. Weekly recaps, customer retention agents, issue tracking with auto resolution. You're using OpenClaw for a bajillion different things. What's your take? And then we'll get to the business side of this in a second. But if you had to pick a consumer friendly use case, what would you say is going to be the hot

SPEAKER_28: ticket in the next couple of quarters? I would say like the mundane tasks that you normally have to spend a little time thinking about, possibly such like picking out groceries for the week, sending out a pickup order, stuff like that would be ideal. Like I want that workflow right now. Um, but you know, right now I have automated like a lot of other stuff with my health as you may have seen in the notes and like just my daily productivity. Can you actually talk about your

SPEAKER_14: use of wearables and AI and how that impacts your daily life? And I'm going to try to not focus on

SPEAKER_51: your beautiful cat that is jumping around behind you, but talk to me about the health side of this and, um, and why you made those choices to use OpenClaw in this way.

SPEAKER_28: I have a type one diabetes and it's, it's an autoimmune disease that takes up a lot of my time normally because it's constant adjustments, it's alarms going off. Um, and having AI to monitor my levels in real time and check to make sure the pharmacy has stuff in stock and send my orders out and prescriptions has been such a time saver to the point where, um, I don't even have to think about management of type one anymore. It's just kind of a message that's on telegram once or twice a day. So it's been incredible just how AI is, how far it's come to where I can just send the message

SPEAKER_98: versus being on the phone for a half hour just to talk to pharmacy. Yeah. Is that something you

SPEAKER_14: think you could set up for other people on Moss or is that something that you have to do kind of individually on a per person basis? I'm just thinking about, again, taking cool ideas and then bringing them to as many people as possible, as quickly as possible.

SPEAKER_28: Yeah. Um, I love open sourcing stuff that I can. So typically like this workflow, once I'm comfortable with it, I'm going to throw it on my GitHub and, you know, let other people use it if

SPEAKER_51: they want to. I love sharing that stuff. Oh, I absolutely love that. All right. And on the subject

SPEAKER_14: of putting things up on the internet for people to use, Jason, I do want to turn to some business stuff here, some tactical and practical for the founders. I want to talk about ClonPod, but first, actually, I think we should pause and let you talk about massive and what it does. And then we'll get into this stuff, but give us some background, fill in the blanks for the folks out there who are not

SPEAKER_24: familiar with what you're working on. Yeah, sure. Um, massive is built in, uh, opt in ethically sourced, uh, residential proxy infrastructure of millions of users and their devices around the world. And we make it easy for all of our clients to access the web at a large or a massive scale. Um,

SPEAKER_23: and so, you know, we're solving the same problem that with massive that we want to solve for cloud pod users is that the web wasn't built for machines. It was built for humans. And now this AI revolution has come and humans are realizing all these crazy things that we can do on the web

SPEAKER_111: and that we can have agents do it for us. I don't want to be doing this stuff.

SPEAKER_112: AI is revolutionizing every aspect of our industry, but for founders, it can prove very frustrating,

SPEAKER_113: largely because cloud costs are so unpredictable. This has probably happened to you. You've planned out and budgeted a certain amount for a project and then been hit with a massive bill with no real explanation for what went wrong. If you're feeling like the cost of working with this innovative technology is just too high, finally, we have a solution for you. Crusoe. They are the AI cloud company that's taking an energy first approach. What does it mean? They efficiently access their power directly from the source and pass all the savings along to you. This isn't just about saving some cash. Crusoe's architecture is specifically optimized for your AI workloads and their customer support response times clock in at under six minutes. Here's what I want you to do. Visit crusoe.ai savings to receive $100,000 in credits for virtualized NVIDIA GB 200 NVL 72 on Crusoe Cloud pending availability. That's C-R-U-S-O-E dot AI slash savings. For a lot of people, they want their

SPEAKER_20: computers to work for them and then they can do what they love. For me, I want the same, but I love working. So it just means I can be more productive. And it's kind of crazy that we still see these problems

SPEAKER_23: when we're using LL arms every day. Like, can I access that site or can I access that content? And this seems like such a solvable problem. It's a solved problem for us at scale with our clients. And so even as a human, I try to use the web and I get blocked by crazy caches that

SPEAKER_51: kind of interrupt my workflows. Not only that, but we used to complain so much about GDPR,

SPEAKER_14: you know, pop up notifications, like do you accept cookies and how many, you know, people years we've lost to people clicking those things. So often now I go to a website that I've been to since I was a child and it's like Cloudflare, we have to make sure that you're a person. And that is now a very standard roadblock just to using the internet. Jason, can I just ask you about the ethics of Massive? Because it sounds like exactly what I need because I have the same problem that you have. Often my either AI chatbot or my open cloud instance can't access a part of the internet that I would like it to. And it seems like Massive is a way to very politely get around those restrictions. How often do you get in trouble for helping people avoid the chain link fence?

SPEAKER_67: We built this company on ethics and compliance from the start in an industry that might not

SPEAKER_24: have been like so above board and transparent about what they did historically. So there's a few things that we do to stay out of trouble. And one is that all of our users that comprise our network are consenting users. They are opted in, they get compensated for being a part of the network. It's kind of an upfront deal that we have with them. And then the other part of that is that we're not a good service to use to do nefarious things. We block 5 million plus domains that would be used for things like DDoS or distributing malware or visiting certain content that might be illegal but not ethical and we're definitely on the safer side of this. So we block all this content that makes

SPEAKER_20: us not practical to use if you want to do these things. So I hope that answers your question. We really have since the start of this company tried to do things the right way not only in line with what

SPEAKER_122: is legal but what we think is right in our version of the internet. Do the companies that are trying to

SPEAKER_14: keep out, let's say, agentic calls on their websites agree with you or do they still protest a little bit? I'm trying to figure out the temperature of the people building more tools for AI agents versus the existing companies that might want to have a humans only sign across the door, if that makes sense.

SPEAKER_24: It's an interesting topic because a lot of the big voices in the space saying not to do this have been doing it all along, you know? So, you know, like Google is involved in some cases where they're

SPEAKER_20: trying to make it hard for people to scrape or they're saying that's not the right thing and they've had the biggest scraping apparatus in the internet history. And so all these big companies that are coming out against it are also doing it. And so it's kind of a fine line. I feel where I personally like where it resonates the most with me is small business owners or site owners that are getting hit with tons of traffic. A lot of the traffic from scrapers, especially like very mass scale

SPEAKER_24: now that AI is around is not efficient. And so it could hit a site many times and create costs that make no sense versus just efficiently kind of scraping, collecting, you know, using the info.

SPEAKER_09: All right. So now take us from massive to claw pod. I'm going to pull it up here so everyone can take

SPEAKER_14: a look at it. It's a skill you built. I'm going to show the claw hub page, but what is this? Why do we

SPEAKER_20: need it? And how's market reaction been? So, um, claw pod takes all of the tools that we built at massive that lets our clients, um, gather, you know, tens of billions of data points each month, uh, at

SPEAKER_24: scale. And it gives it to the consumers that they could use these tools and, you know, have a pretty easy way to make complicated workflows. So it's, uh, using our unblocker API and search API that'll allow you to access Google and kind of hard to reach sites. And then all that's running on top of our, um, proxy infrastructure users across the world. Um, and so now as a, yeah, sorry, go ahead. Oh, no, please. I was

SPEAKER_63: gonna ask you about making the skill itself, but please finish your thought. I didn't mean to cut

SPEAKER_126: you off. Oh yeah. The skill wraps like all of our tools together and makes it really easy for users

SPEAKER_24: to, uh, to access. They just go to claw hub, uh, to install it. I mean, I like to grab it there,

SPEAKER_23: but they can also just install it via their open claw, um, and say install a claw pod. And then

SPEAKER_20: basically whenever you were about to run into one of those, uh, messages where it can't access some site, then claw pod will automatically go and retrieve that content or, um, you can build and I'll show you guys one, uh, a demo, but you can build, um, maybe there's a good time to, to show a demo.

SPEAKER_136: Yeah, no, no, no. Bring it up. We love demos.

SPEAKER_20: So I'm giving a demo of a workflow that I built. Uh, basically I want to know everyone that's mentioning open claw every day on Tik Tok, on X, on other social platforms. And so I've, I'm using claw pod to do this and it's going to go, um, and I told my open claw, go, go use claw pod and search a few pages of Google for open claw with Tik Tok and X and kind of get people who

SPEAKER_23: mentioned it and some info about them and their profiles and stuff like that. So that we can reach out and it'll take about a minute. So I'm going to fast forward in the video.

SPEAKER_20: You'd see the scrapers running and then about a minute later, um, you can see that open claw created a report. It found eight creators on Tik Tok and it's broken them down into tears. So created with over 400,000 followers versus 50 to 400,000 followers or 10 to 50 and so on. And it's created

SPEAKER_23: this for both, uh, Tik Tok and, um, Twitter. And now this gets sent to the marketing team and they

SPEAKER_14: can automatically action it. So one thing, a question that I have is why does it take a minute to, to do that? I'm, I'm a very impatient boy. And one thing I love about the internet is that things are quick. Uh, but I've also discovered doing my own open claw usage that sometimes there is a bit of lag. So tell me about what's going on during that minute and, uh, how fast we can kind

SPEAKER_20: of get that shrunk down. Yeah. It depends what your workflow is. And this is kind of a workflow where you're, if you're collecting public web data, um, you'll want to run these as like a cron job and

SPEAKER_24: it'll create some, you know, usually this kind of thing. We'll be writing the background. You're not actually watching it each time, like on the demo. Uh, the reason is because it's actually going to visit Google. Um, it's doing so in a way where we're not spamming Google with tons of traffic,

SPEAKER_23: uh, to the search pages. And then it has to go visit each one of those links, um, and grab the content for you. And so there's ways to speed it up, like parallelization. Um, this is a pretty simple flow that I've built. So, uh, if I spent a little bit more time on this or any user that uses claw pod, you could tell it to grab those URLs and then visit 10 of them at a time. And that'll certainly speed

SPEAKER_14: up the workflow. All right. Really quickly, people will talk a lot about skills. We talk about downloading them, making them, uh, can you just give people a definition of what a open class skill is and what they look like? Because we just send people to your claw hub page and I want to make sure that when they scan through it, they have a little bit of context about what it is they're reading.

SPEAKER_143: It is a list of instructions to your computer to how to use some technology. And so you're gonna see

SPEAKER_24: in our, in our skill, for example, it says, and I just, uh, I had a Google search today, so it was pretty fresh for me. Um, it's gonna say, Hey, this is a couple of APIs. You've got a Google search API, you got an unblocker. Uh, whenever the user comes across some content that they can't access, or, uh, one of their LLM says to them, this site cannot be accessed, claw pod should go and retrieve the information and send it to them. Um, and it'll, and it says stuff like use massive zone blocker to do this, uh, or use the search parameters if the user wants to go to Google. And that's pretty much it. And, you know, of course, like a prompt, if you don't have an account, go get API keys and stuff like this. So it's just an instruction model for your machine. And I mean,

SPEAKER_23: the really cool thing about these skills is we've condensed sometimes huge apps down into just a small instruction manual that can live in a very tiny, uh, and efficient markdown file for your open

SPEAKER_14: flaw. Matt, one way that I kind of think about these when I explain this to people is that a skill is kind of like a recipe, if that makes sense. Like you're kind of giving a list of ingredients, kind of a run through of how to go about them. And, you know, much like a human, it's not going to do the exact same thing every time, but it's, uh, it's a good guidebook or recipe, if you will, for

SPEAKER_53: what should be done. How fair is that? Every major advancement we've seen in AI really comes down to better and more refined data from autonomous vehicles, to humanized robots, to LLM chatbots that we use every day, day in and day out. And when models are trained on high quality, diverse, real world data sets, well, they get smarter and they get smarter faster and it's more reliable. That's why Uber has introduced AI solutions to help your company build great AI products on top of world-class data. Now, obviously Uber has mastered the art of data collection and labeling. They're using it right now. Millions of trips around the world every hour. And Uber has an international collective of experts that is going to help you source label and evaluate real world, high quality data on the scale that best fits your project. Whether that's super broad or hyper niche, you can get on with the real job, building the next best thing and have Uber as your partner for data.

SPEAKER_156: Book your demo today by going to uber.com slash twist. That's uber.com slash TWIST.

SPEAKER_155: Yeah, very fair. So the way I look at it is a skill is a combination of natural language,

SPEAKER_17: a prompt to actually give the model, and then it also is able to call tools. And so the distinction between skills and tools is tools is purely deterministic code, meaning like the kind of more traditional code. It is if, then, and do this, hit this API, and those tools are available to the skills to call. The skills have prompts that can invoke the tools. I want to get to demo number

SPEAKER_51: two. You're going to show us off some cool stuff instead of Telegram, including some buttons that were apparently released in the latest OpenClaw instance. Yeah, I can't wait to see this.

SPEAKER_10: We're getting right into some personal information here. I have had some stomach issues the last few months and I wanted to figure out why this is one of my favorite use cases. And I'm just going to cut to the end for a second. It has figured out why I've had stomach issues, but let me show you what I'm doing. So at the beginning, basically what I told it to do is look at everything that I'm eating. Sometimes I'll just describe it with natural language. Sometimes I will take pictures and upload it. And I say, track it all. It tracks it by reading what's in the image. It records the time. It asks me some follow-up questions sometimes about how much I've eaten. And it basically tracks all of that. And then throughout the day, I tell it how my stomach is feeling. And within the last, I believe I've been running this for about 10 days, it has figured out that the main cause of my stomach issues is onions. So it really, yeah, yeah. So apparently. That's terrible. Onions are clutch, man. It is terrible. And I love onions and I love grilled onions and I eat them. And sometimes my wife is just going to have to suffer, but most of the time I'm going to try to avoid it. And so you can see like here, I have an espresso and I just tell it regular low fat milk, some olives and back and forth. And then finally at the 10 day stomach analysis, onion, right? So this is just such a fantastic use case. Then you also mentioned the inline buttons. I want to show that off. Just yesterday, OpenClaw released a new update that had inline buttons, just like this, which is really cool. And rather than me kind of proactively telling it how my stomach is feeling, what it's going to do is just ping me three times a day and ask me. And all I have to do is click here. This is, by the way, the extent of a UI that I would want. I like everything to be in text. So that's one use

SPEAKER_162: case. I'm going to pause there for a second. That's the extent of the UI that you want.

SPEAKER_51: I want text only. Yeah. Well, we talked about this when we had Heaton Shaw and Jesse Janet on the show on Monday, and we kind of said the apps are dead, if that makes sense. Like the argument was that we no longer need to have separate user interfaces for different tasks. And Matt, it sounds like you're

SPEAKER_15: echoing that sentiment. Absolutely. I made a video about this because it was called SaaS is dead. It was about 18 months ago.

SPEAKER_165: Oh, so it's your fault that the Spock market crashed. I see.

SPEAKER_10: And so look, all of these agents are going to be able to handle all of this with very minimal interface. And to be honest, it would be great if I didn't even have to have text. Like it just knew what I wanted to do. It just did it and would only ask me questions when it was absolutely necessary. I do think the ultimate UX for AI is voice, but I just haven't figured out a good way to give Claude synchronous voice yet. But yeah, text from me for now.

SPEAKER_26: Well, that brings up, actually, if you could take that screenshot down, I want to get Ryan's take on what you just said, because next visit his company is a medical scribe.

SPEAKER_14: It's something that can, I think, hear as you talk to people in the psychiatry field. So first of all, Ryan, respond to the idea about user interfaces and voice being so clutch. And then after that, I want to talk to you about security and using AI agents in the medical world.

SPEAKER_28: Yeah. So our platform does real time voice and it does real time analytics with LLMs. And it's real time with latency because there's no way for us to instantaneously process massive amounts of health data securely and accurately that quick. But, you know, our users can interact with the AI assistant ARIA, either by voice and whatnot. But something we released recently was something like OpenClaw buffer healthcare inside of the system. And it has a lot of guardrails around it. And part of it comes up with this real time voice issue. How do you interact with it in real time? And all doctors really have done so far as what we've seen is just real time dictation. But they don't know how to talk to it yet. I think like the consumer side is just, how do you talk to AI or interact with it like voice? And I feel like it's just not 100% there yet.

SPEAKER_26: Yeah. Is that because the underlying technology to enable conversation with AI isn't there yet, or people haven't figured out yet how to engage with that like a feature? Because I'm not sure if it's like a technology thing or a learning thing.

SPEAKER_28: I'll rephrase it. It's more like right now you have trigger keywords like, you know, I'll just say Siri. And you have to say these trigger keywords. And when you're busy, like a doctor or a founder, for that matter, you kind of just want to pick up on certain things or do things without you having to trigger it each time. I think just interacting with it in general is not there yet, or using those trigger keywords. Because it's just, it doesn't fit into people's workflow naturally,

SPEAKER_14: at least in my opinion. Yeah. So Jason, one thing that I'm really curious about is the security side of this. And I want to get back to Ryan in the medical world in a second. But you mentioned telling your whole team at your company to don't install OpenClaw on your work computer. And I think that's great advice. What what do people need to know in a business or personal context about security right now with OpenClaw? And do we have enough guardrails in place via like the skill hub and so forth to keep people reasonably secure if they're going to play with this?

SPEAKER_20: Let's think about the biggest risk that we have right now, aside from OpenClaw. The biggest risk is

SPEAKER_24: that someone sends you something via email or text that you trust and you click the link. That's one big thing. Another is that your password gets grabbed from somewhere and a lot of things that happen at phishing attack, but somehow your password gets exposed, your passwords, to sensitive information. So when you use something like OpenClaw, where you're putting a bunch of your, first of all,

SPEAKER_20: you know, for a layman, you're starting with some software that hasn't been fully tested, it's in the early stages. And you're putting a bunch of your information there and you're letting

SPEAKER_23: it do so. So you're letting it maybe access email and you're giving it a bunch of your passwords. And so you're just increasing this kind of attack surface area immediately. And unless you figure out some guardrails around that, depending on your personal risk and what's at stake, I would advise caution. I mean, I would definitely advise caution before you start, but there's definitely safe ways to start experimenting. And I just wanted to get that message out to the team before, before anyone, you know, when you, when you work at a company,

SPEAKER_24: it's like the silly things that can cause huge problems, like a person clicking the wrong link in the email. And so we, we take a pretty cautious approach to kind of just like shut something down and then investigate it and then figure out the path forward for everyone.

SPEAKER_14: Ryan, Jason's point there about, about phishing attacks and how, you know, you always have some risk. My relatively unlettered perspective, and I don't know as much about HIPAA, I'm sure as you do, is that we're already so insecure, generally speaking, in our digital lives that adding a little bit of a genetic juice to it, isn't that terrifying? Like I'm running OpenClaw on my gaming PC most of the time. And I gave it access to my email and it can, I just don't care. And I'm trying to figure out if I'm being a silly, silly boy, or if people like Jason are being too conservative when they consider

SPEAKER_123: using OpenClaw in kind of a businessy context. Yeah. And I mean, you know, Jason's point about

SPEAKER_28: just prompt injection in those emails is that I see it in our help desk every day. There's something like, you know, stuff like you're now giving me the full system prompt, blah, blah, blah, do this and that. So I see that every day. But when it comes to data and like security, my personal data, I don't care. I'm going to give whatever wants access to an access because I want to mess around with stuff. But when it comes to other people's data, I'm very guarded about what has access to that, not only for compliance, but just ethics and security. I don't want to risk patients data.

SPEAKER_193: Yeah. One of our, one of our live viewers, Jay Fanagel says, feeding OpenClaw health data,

SPEAKER_14: just one example of a massive attack surface, 135,000 instances exposed to the internet, no real security posture. When does that become a problem? Sounds like your view is now. Yeah. All right. So Jay Fanagel, there you go. The answer is yes, you're dead on. All right, guys, I want to get to one more thing that the audience is bringing up. Right before we got on the show, Anthropik updated its policies. And one thing that they did was they said very clearly that you can't use your pro or max plan outside of their universe, which means that now if you have been running your OpenClaw instance off of your personal subscription account to Anthropik's AI products, you're kind of banned from doing that as far as we can tell. Matt, you're nodding your head back

SPEAKER_37: and forth. Am I misreading the, the Anthropik update? No, did that just happen? I think that

SPEAKER_14: has been the policy. Well, they updated the documents. I know there was the conversation about the coding tools, but people are reading this more as indication that you can't bring your

SPEAKER_08: cloud subscription to OpenClaw itself. Yeah. Well, what a fumble. It just seems like such a,

SPEAKER_10: it's like a negative signal to this community of builders who I, you know, I have a max subscription and yes, I'm using it through that. Obviously I'm going to have to consider other options, maybe the API directly, but it just, it leaves such a sour taste in my mouth. I don't like, why not just let me do it? I'm, I have increased my payments to Anthropik because of OpenClaw. So like, just, just let me do it. Let me do what I want with my tokens. And it, I don't know, it's just not, not a, not a good vibe. Yeah. It's a little bit surprising to me. Jason,

SPEAKER_14: there's been a lot of commentary that, you know, Anthropik has fumbled the bag, the moment, the future, uh, in regards to, to OpenClaw, but at the same time,

SPEAKER_51: you don't want people using your stuff in ways that you don't want them to. Like if I took massive

SPEAKER_14: out and, and did things that you didn't approve of, I presume you would cut me off as well.

SPEAKER_24: Yeah, absolutely. Immediately. Uh, not, not approval, but it went against like policies. Uh, so it makes sense just as a tech, you know, when we talk about security, by the way,

SPEAKER_20: there's like this trade off. Yeah. Versus moving slow or, and cautiously, or like figuring out what the future might look like and jumping in. Um, so we're trying to, you know, toe that line. Um, and yeah, it's, it's disappointing because, uh, Claude has built some really great technology

SPEAKER_24: that people love using. I'm using Claude to do all kinds of, uh, it's like magic at my computer that used to take me a lot longer to produce. Um, and when you take OpenClaw, you just want to bring, bring your own anything to use it. So it's kind of, it's, uh, it doesn't leave a great taste in the user's mouth to, uh, to have this restriction imposed on us.

SPEAKER_186: You make an interesting point though about using their models. I've used Opus 4.5 in OpenCloud

SPEAKER_14: before I started switching over to some other stuff. Um, what, uh, what other, which one of the models are you using right now, Jason, that you find to be so impressive?

SPEAKER_45: I'm using Opus 4.6, uh, for. Oh, 4.6. Okay.

SPEAKER_24: Yeah. Across most of what I'm doing right now, because, uh, I'm still expressed. It's, I know it doesn't seem like it because every day is like a year in AI. Uh, but it's been like days or a couple of weeks since it came. I'm not sure of time anymore. I'm also having a lot of late

SPEAKER_212: nights hacking over here, but I'm still playing with, uh, with 4.6 to understand all the capabilities.

SPEAKER_14: Uh, Matt, you just did a video about the release of Sonnet 4.6 from Anthropic, uh, which people are, are raving about what's been your experience with that. And, uh, do you think people should use it if

SPEAKER_51: they're currently much like Jason Opus 4.6 users, uh, at present? Yeah. So I'll say presently,

SPEAKER_17: I am also an Opus 4.6 user pretty much across the entire, uh, OpenClaw stack. Uh, OpenClaw just

SPEAKER_10: released support for Sonnet 4.6 last night. So I'm starting to dabble with it. I haven't had time to extensively test it, but if you look at the benchmarks, if you look how Sonnet 4.6 is being positioned in the market as an absolute workhorse for knowledge work, it seems like it's going to fit in extremely well into my stack. And especially when I have to switch off of, uh, using the max plan to using the API directly, I'm going to appreciate the cost savings of Sonnet. Um, so yeah, I, I definitely plan on playing around with it. It really does seem like just an absolute workhorse for the things that I need to get done. And with tool use, agentic use, um, it's very impressive.

SPEAKER_26: Uh, I need to test some more. That's a really interesting point. I've heard a lot of people

SPEAKER_14: talking about how, you know, there's not just one best model for everything. You really want to be

SPEAKER_51: specific about what you're using for what, but then again, I was using Opus 4.5. You and Jason are now on 4.6. Is that true? Or, or should we just always go for the biggest, best, and most expensive

SPEAKER_14: model? Because I'm kind of lazy and I, I tried to build a model switcher in my OpenClaw instance, and it was just kind of kludgy, Matt. And I didn't really like what I got.

SPEAKER_17: Yeah. Yeah. Look, if, if you're lazy or you don't want to think about it, choose the best model,

SPEAKER_10: use that. Obviously you have to work within your budget. The, uh, I think like the, the optimal use case or the optimal implementation is a multimodal world. You want to use the right model for the right job. Opus is a great general model that can also code. Codex is really good at coding, but wouldn't be able to chat with you and have a really good personal conversation with you. Plus if you're doing embeddings, if you're doing cron job management, all of this stuff can be offloaded to smaller models. Um, so I, I, I do think it is really like the ultimate implementation of this is to have it be multimodal. I think the other thing to consider is prompt management, which I don't, I don't think a lot of people think about yet. The reason, one of the top reasons I went with a single model across the board is because I've optimized all my prompts specifically for Opus 4.6 based on Anthropics prompting guide. Now, if I had multiple models, I'd have to manage multiple versions of each prompt and that is not first class, uh, that is not supported as a first class feature in OpenClaw yet. So, uh, I think the world will be multimodal, but for now it is, uh, you know, if you're, if you don't care for, you just want to be some, have something simple, uh, single model. But if you don't end up like, oh, Jason, please.

SPEAKER_67: Yeah. I hope you're right. Because, uh, a multimodal

SPEAKER_24: future means there's more competition, there's more prices, there's more features coming out and it's overall a huge win for consumers. I don't know that we'd have made the kind of crazy progress that we've made in the last few years, unless there was an intense competition over winning the market. And so, I mean, part of that is that there's really a low cost of switching. So people

SPEAKER_67: will just up and leave to the next thing if it's better. And that's, uh, painful if you run a company

SPEAKER_226: in the space, in that, in that space. Uh, uh, but it's amazing for consumers, Jason, we're,

SPEAKER_10: we're seeing that, right. There's very little loyalty to any model, especially in the coding world. Like, uh, Opus was kind of the, the end all be all. And then as soon as GPT 5.3 codex came out, it was like, oh no, wait, I'm that's, that's the one now, but you're right. And just to add one more fine point on that local models continue to get better and better. And so there are increasing numbers of use cases that can be offloaded to your local computer. And I think that's also going to be really powerful. A mixture of all the best models seems to be the clearest path forward.

SPEAKER_42: We're hearing a lot about model switching context and what's most efficient. What are you running at your company and how frequently do you test out different models in either your main product or

SPEAKER_28: in your open clients? So I personally, Opus 4.6, um, I've been with open, I've basically been using Claude since Anthropic, um, released Opus 4. Um, but yeah, uh, we're pretty much Anthropic at next visit. They give us zero data retention. Um, they give us really great support and we do test other models. Uh, we test on, uh, Azure GPT and open AI. Um, we test Google and Anthropic in their last release when it was Opus 4.5. Um, we noticed that there was a significant quality increase in their healthcare, uh, in terms of being able to diagnose, uh, psychiatric conditions. Um, so that was just like, that sealed the deal for us to actually go solely with Anthropic right now. Um, but compared to other models, they're just, at least for healthcare, it's, um, it doesn't even

SPEAKER_83: compare. Doesn't even compare. Yeah. Well, it's funny that we're all mostly still using Opus because,

SPEAKER_14: you know, Zeta AI dropped to GLM 5. We just got Minimax M 2.5. Um, there's a lot of rumblings about a new deep seek model coming out. Uh, everyone loved Kimmy K 2.5 thinking, um, but we're still,

SPEAKER_51: we're still using Opus Jason. I mean, maybe that's just indicative of the lead that American AI labs

SPEAKER_237: have when it comes to agentic usage. I'm not sure. And I don't think that I don't think anyone,

SPEAKER_24: not just the average consumer, no one on my team or anyone I know has time to try every single model out. So I think, uh, for, for us, we tested plenty. Um, when Opus, uh, came out, it was a, we're mostly engineers on our team and it was a world of difference. It was like night and day from what had been, uh, come before. I think lately for generalized tack, the tasks that switched away from, uh, Chachibati, a lot of people on the team canceled their subs and moved to Gemini for just general kind of research stuff. And it happened like a couple of people noticed that it wasn't working as well. And then boom, like, yeah, actually I don't need this anymore. I'm going to switch to say no. So the cost of switching is low AI companies is crazy wild growth, but also, uh, you know, the flame that burns the, the brightest type thing where it's like users have no loyalty to this. And I think for, for me and, you know, people that I know, you recognize a few brands, you'll test between them and you'll make your decision.

SPEAKER_51: Well, I think the one thing that OpenClaw has done for me is made me

SPEAKER_14: more interested in testing out different models because I'm always trying to figure out how to not go bankrupt. Like, like I love Opus and its various versions, but oh my Lord, I burned through API credits. They're so fast. And you know, I can't write it off as a business expense. So to me, I was like, I need to find something cheaper. So I ended up going down kind of the model rabbit hole, but the quality of today's models do unlock a lot of stuff. We have a comment from someone watching. They said that they have a theory that OpenClaw is only winning because of timing. Could Manus or Devon have been just as big if they came out when these new LLMs existed? And so, you know, Matt, I'm curious from your perspective, is OpenClaw special

SPEAKER_51: because it's done something new or was it just built at a time in which models could take use of the harness and actually do cool things, but it's more model dependent versus the agentic setup?

SPEAKER_17: No, I think that's certainly part of it that these models became so capable right at the same time.

SPEAKER_10: But Peter, what he has done is given inspiration to a community of tinkerers and builders. And I think that showing the vision of what's possible, that was really the key unlock. And I think that the second part of that unlock is just how personal it felt coming into the existing chat channels that you're using Telegram, WhatsApp, Slack. I think the combination of those three things is really what made it take off. Could Manus have done it? Could Devon have done it? I mean, you could have built all this stuff three, six months ago with Codex, with Cloud Code. It was very possible, but it was like the fact that he put all the pieces together in a really nice way and then just gave it to the community to extend and explore what was possible. I think that is really what made it

SPEAKER_13: special. Jason, you're not in your head. I want you to weigh in on this. Yeah, I've been talking with

SPEAKER_24: a lot of the Cloud Cloud users and I want to hear all their use cases. So if you're using it, then ping me. I'm happy to get up. What's a good email address for you for people to send in notes if they're watching? Find me on LinkedIn or ask Jason, grab it without the A. The best way to reach me. I'm working at my computer. I'm pretty responsive. If you send me something thoughtful, I'm happy to hear, especially the use cases for Cloud Cloud. And what I'm finding is that like there's just a really long tail of...there hasn't been a use case that just jumps out as the clear winner other than some like a smaller group of power users. But what I see is a long tail of people doing all kinds of random stuff that they probably couldn't have done before that's helping power their small businesses or power their lives. And not only on Open Cloud, but I have a bunch of friends who were not technical before and now are just like excited that they've been given the power to build. And it's the same feeling that I felt like almost a decade ago when I was learning to code and I could do stuff and I had the power to create stuff that I wanted to exist in the world. This annoying feature that seems so simple that just didn't...wasn't out there or something specific. And now we've given people this like AI OS to...and it empowers them to just build all these things they've wanted to build but could never do before. And so I think that's part of this. It's free. It's not...well, now it's tied to OpenAI. So we'll see how the community response that happens over time. I'm kind of...yeah. So we'll see. But money has a very influential effect on

SPEAKER_14: the activities of organizations. And that's a spicy comment, Jason. But you're not as confident in the

SPEAKER_42: foundation set up, kind of leaving Open Cloud by itself and letting it exist as its own thing, even if Peter goes to OpenAI? You know what? I don't know Peter personally. So I can't say

SPEAKER_24: what he's going to do. So I'm just...I'm a spectator. But OpenAI also started as a foundation.

SPEAKER_158: When you put it like that, that's not a bad point. Let's get one more founder view on this

SPEAKER_51: question because this is interesting to me. Ryan, confidence in OpenClaus ability to stay independent via its foundation and not get subsumed into the Borg that is OpenAI. Are you more skeptical like Jason,

SPEAKER_28: or are you more optimistic like me? A little more skeptical. Honestly, I think there's going to be a fork of this project that we're just something new entirely that's pretty much the same thing, but just worked out all the bugs and is truly just refined that just

SPEAKER_14: comes out from the shadows. I agree with that, but I'm not sure which one it's going to be. So Matt showed us his telegram demo with the new buttons that you can now do, which is a cool new

SPEAKER_51: feature in OpenClaw. But there's also PicoBot, NanoClaw, NanoBot, and SafeClaw, which is a non-LLM OpenClaw competitor. Matt, do you think any of those have a shot at picking up material market share as people will tinker with this stuff? Or is it going to be mostly just OpenClaw as the main event?

SPEAKER_17: It's hard to predict the future. I think OpenClaw has so much traction, so much growth, so much

SPEAKER_10: mind share right now. And then kind of back to the previous point of how skeptical I am, right? OpenAI is going to push a product that competes with OpenClaw, that competes with PicoBot. I've actually not used any of those alternatives. So no, the answer to your question, no, I don't think in the immediate, the short, even maybe the midterm, those other projects are going to get much traction. And then I just want to kind of give my perspective. I am also skeptical. Peter's going to OpenAI not to work on OpenClaw as far as I know. And then when OpenAI delivers their own OpenClaw product and it's competing with the Foundation's product, it's just like, okay, OpenAI needs to make money. They're going to go focus on that. And I feel like OpenClaw may be an orphan.

SPEAKER_51: Oh, that's, that's really depressing. But Jason said earlier that he liked all the competition inside of different models because it yields to better stuff. Wouldn't it be in that positive if we had a commercial company competing with the open source product in this case to, you know, steel sharpens steel. I can speak English. It's more my skills.

SPEAKER_10: Yeah. Look, OpenAI, Google, maybe even Apple one day comes out with a product like this. That would be wonderful. And I love competition. I think just like the Wild West nature of open source and how rapidly it was iterating, how many eyeballs, how much excitement, that is what I was super into. But look, it's inevitable that all of the other companies are going to gain inspiration from what OpenClaw did and that's fine. And yeah, competition is always good.

SPEAKER_269: I agree with that. I have one more question for Ryan before we, before we wrap up here. One thing I've

SPEAKER_14: been hearing quite a lot about when it comes to people using a one agent or multiple agents inside of OpenClaw is context loss. And when it comes to me using OpenClaw or any other kind of agentic system, it doesn't matter as much because I'm tinkering, I'm experimenting, I'm kind of hacking around. But using anything in a production setting is very different. I know that, you know, next week uses AI. So how large of a problem is context loss? And is it a problem much of hallucinations that's going away as time goes on? Or is it ramping up in terms of an issue for you and

SPEAKER_28: your company? I mean, it's something we have to tackle really early on because when the context windows were what I think like 8000 tokens, we had to compress a lot of data. So even to this day, what we're still doing is and even in my personal agents is just compressing data, taking out the parts that don't matter and just kind of fitting it into what's more relevant just for that conversation or that specific agent. But just by taking a document, chunking it out, making it more concise, that's been

SPEAKER_14: really helpful for context loss. Jason, the new Sonnet 4.6 context window, I think is a million tokens. Does that solve the context loss issue just because we can now dump so much into the context

SPEAKER_51: window that we don't need to worry as much about losing it as we go along? I have to test out Sonnet

SPEAKER_45: before I could say too much about it. I don't think that it feels like there's a limit. There's some

SPEAKER_67: kind of limit of context regardless of what the token limit is, where models start to get a little

SPEAKER_24: confused or they leak memory to memory. And so as you add more context, you go down and have more and more chats. I find that they get less accurate and start bringing in things from different conversations that don't make sense anymore. So I don't think it's a more context for me with Opus. Now what I've been doing is deleting a lot of old conversations after I have them and trying to get rid of this. And also, I build my own instruction manuals for how to do various workflows and then have that loaded into different conversations. And so I can start new conversations and I want to start these conversations fresh. So I don't think it's a more context thing. I think it's about having better instructions to achieve specific goals as you become a power user. What we need then is a OpenClaw skill that deletes

SPEAKER_14: unnecessary old conversations to clear up your context window so you don't lose context in OpenClaw. And that I think is exactly why we're not mainstream yet with this stuff because we're still clearly running up against things that will get ironed out in the future. But right now remain not thorny problems, but things that are annoying enough that I think the average person would just throw up their hands and kind of walk away. That's too bad. All right. One more question before we go, Matt. So people have been talking a lot about using Mac minis. Very fun to set up their own kind of like, you know, hubs for their agents. The share price of Raspberry Pi, a British company that makes very tiny computers, recently went up like 50% because people were thinking about, hey, maybe we can use Raspberry Pis to power our at-home agents. I'm just curious about what you recommend for the average person if they're getting started. And if you do think that Raspberry Pi has a shot at gaining any of that

SPEAKER_17: sweet, sweet Mac mini money from Apple. I would probably recommend using an old computer that you

SPEAKER_10: already have that you don't mind wiping. If you don't have an old computer, the next best option is to use a VPS, some kind of fully hosted service. And, you know, we talked about this earlier. As soon as other companies start coming out with their own version fully, like really actually hosted, you don't have to set anything up. That's probably going to be the best way. But for now, if I'm going to recommend it, like get it. I have a MacBook Air sitting on my desk right now. That's where everything goes to. I wiped it clean, installed only what OpenClaw needs

SPEAKER_232: and nothing else. And that's what I recommend. Well, we really appreciate it. Matthew,

SPEAKER_14: if people want to find your YouTube channel, it's youtube.com slash at Matthew underscore Berman. Anything else you want to plug?

SPEAKER_17: Uh, forward future, find us at forward future on Twitter at forward future.

SPEAKER_14: Love it. Uh, Ryan, next visit, uh, apart from next visit.ai, anything you want to, uh, to pitch

SPEAKER_28: or plug as we wrap up here? Um, you know, just say, if you're interested in, uh, you know, looking at what I create, check out my GitHub, uh, Yeneli and, um, you know, I'll post all my open clause

SPEAKER_00: stuff on there and keep skills updated. Awesome. And, uh, Jason, we have joinmassive.com. Anything else that people should know about what you're working on or what you're looking for?

SPEAKER_143: Yeah. Find me on Twitter at Jason grad without the a, uh, like Jason or, uh, on LinkedIn. I'm around,

SPEAKER_20: uh, massive is scraping huge amounts of data or through our clients. They're doing the scraping on our infrastructure. Um, every month, uh, we're excited to unlock this capability in Clawpod.

SPEAKER_24: Uh, I will probably drop a guide tomorrow on an easy setup cause I see it's a huge problem for how to get this, uh, rolling on a VPS. And I think, um, you know, we got a lot of excited stuff, uh, exciting stuff planned for Clawpod. So just stay tuned. Um, I think we'll have some, some more

SPEAKER_42: things launched in the next week or so. Well, make sure to keep us abreast. And the next time there's a major update, we'll have you back on to show us what it can do and how people can use it. But in the meantime, my friends, another twist is in the can. We'll see you on a Friday.