SPEAKER_00: All right, everybody. Monday, February 16th, 2026. Lots of news. He's at Alex. I'm at Jason. This is Twist. We have a breaking news story that dropped Sunday. Open Claw getting bought by the evil empire. Open AI. Sam Altman has bought Open Claw. Here we are in AD 24 or AO 24. 24 days after we started talking about the incredible open source project, Open Claw, and it's already been purchased. We're going to talk all about what that means and handicap it. Alex, you decided to

SPEAKER_02: bring some great guests on today for our Monday show of Twist. Who do we got? Yes, we got a couple

SPEAKER_05: of awesome guests. First up, we have Heaton Shaw, someone that I've known in the technology world for a very long time. He's the CEO of Crazy Egg, prior co-founder and CEO of a number of other companies, fantastic technologist and Open Claw fanatic. Heaton, thank you for coming on the show. And we also have Jessie Janae. She is a former founder and currently a homeschooling mom, and she's using Open Claw in and around how she teaches her kids about the world. So two different use cases, two different awesome people, but Open Claw, Jason, as you know, has a lot of uses. So I figured let's bring them both on and learn from each of them. All right. And Heaton, my God, I've known

SPEAKER_02: him for a long time. He's an OG now. He's an OG now. He's got the gray hair, but he was a kid in

SPEAKER_00: the Web 2 era. And Jesse, I saw you on Twitter talking all about your homeschooling, which I'm a fan of, and how you're doing incredible things with Open Claw. Before we get to each of your individual uses of Open Claw, this incredible new platform, we have to talk about what some people feel is a rug pull, what some people feel is the end of the project. What other people feel is going to be just fine. And they're extremely happy for the founder of Open Claw to secure a bag

SPEAKER_11: in under 60 days. This is going to wind up being the largest, if it is in fact a unicorn, which I'm sure with the stock options, it will be. Alex, this would be the solopreneur billion dollar company

SPEAKER_04: that we've been talking about. Yeah, kind of. So this is the thing that I'm really curious about. And I wanted to talk about it with the group because the numbers aren't super clear. The way

SPEAKER_12: they've phrased this is Peter's going to, Peter, the guy behind Open Claw originally, is going to join Open AI and they're going to put Open Claw into a foundation that Dave Morin is involved with and so forth. But Jason, what was not discussed at any point was an enormous pile of money going from Sam Altman's pocket to Peter's pocket, at least explicitly. So is he being brought on to Open AI with a fat sack of stock options as an equivalent to an acquisition? Is that how you see this working

SPEAKER_14: out? My guess, I am strictly guessing here, is that they gave him a pile of cash as a signing bonus.

SPEAKER_00: I would estimate that would be a nine figure, kind of mid nine figure deal. I would put it at 250, maybe even as high as 500 million in some combination of cash and stock in Open AI. Then he was probably given another equal amount to be a team member of Open AI for the next four years. I would then put the deal at 250 plus 500, 500 plus 500, something in that zone, because he could have easily raised $50 million at a 300, 400, 500 million dollar valuation, perhaps even a billion dollar valuation from investors. So what Open AI had to beat was $100 million from Sequoia, Andreessen, GC, any number of firms would have given him $100 million plus maybe bought $100 million of his shares at a, let's call it a billion dollar post, a $2 billion post, because this is such a phenomenon. It is the highest ramping ever GitHub project. Therefore, you have to beat market. I'm going to guess what Peter did, and he will tell us over time, and he's interacted with me a bunch over the weekend

SPEAKER_11: and in my threads, because I had told him and I had DM'd him, like, don't do it, don't do it, don't do it. You're the chosen one. This is the chosen project. Do not sell to Sam Altman. Don't do it. Look at Sam Altman's history. Look at what he did to Elon. Look at his co-founders leaving. Look at him almost getting fired. Just look at that track record. Look at the YC track record. I, and this is nothing against Sam Altman. We're, we're friendly and we've known each other for over 20 years, but he's a cutthroat guy. He's known as a deal maker. Doesn't surprise me that he got this deal because he's from the Zuckerberg school. I've said this over and over again. He is as sharp as a blade gets. He is the greatest deal maker of this generation, I believe, or will become. All right. So we have two founders

SPEAKER_12: with us. We have two founders with us. I'm curious. First of all, first reactions to the deal. And do you guys agree with Jason's framing about the financials here? Let's do Heaton and then Jesse.

SPEAKER_22: Something had to happen. If you look at all the open source sort of projects that are out there, it's better when they're supported. So, you know, that's kind of my current take. Someone was going to support it. It just happened really fast. And so there's a lot of news and drama about it. And of course, lots of opinions. I don't have any, except I'm here to use the technology to the maximum

SPEAKER_23: benefit I can get and contribute as much as possible. Jesse. I hope I, yeah, I think as a user,

SPEAKER_27: I hope the product just actually keeps getting better and better. I think obviously there's a little irony, like we've got open claw and we've got open AI and maybe they're not so open, hopefully open claw starts, continues to be an amazing open source project. We'll see.

SPEAKER_12: All right. So Jason, you were talking about how you were worried, you know, he is the, this is the chosen app. Don't sell the Sam, the foundation model. There's a lot of open source foundations out there, kind of a tried and true method. Do you think that it's going to be a good setup for open claw to persist and keep improving over time? Or is this more of a sop to keep people happy as open AI tries to get all the juice from the particular lemon? Okay. I'm going to give you

SPEAKER_00: the most optimistic take and I'm going to give you the most cynical worst case scenario. Give you both. Which one do you want first, Alex? I want the sad, cynical, cynical first and then good after that. Yeah. Okay. Here's the most cynical take. This technology was becoming so powerful that it commoditized open AI and clawed because it, it wins the interface. Whoever wins the interface wins the day. You can see the Chrome browser. You can see Mac OS. You can see windows. If you own the operating system, you own the distribution. It was becoming very clear that the front door for using AI had switched from chat GPT chat room to now people using open claw. Anybody using open claw stopped going to clawed XAI Gemini. You just stop going there and you interact with your agent and your agent goes and interface them, which commoditizes them. We know it commoditizes them because the discussion in under 10 days became in our organization. How do we get the maximum number of tokens for the lowest possible price? And everybody, and I'm sure Jesse, I see her nodding and Heaton will all agree that you become a token junkie when you start using this. And you say, I have to get a Mac studio because I want to run Kimmy or I want to run, you know, DeepSeek. So that is the most cynical take. So what would you do if a most cynical person in the world, the most cutthroat person in the world, let's call him Zuckerberg. What would Zuck do? What would Microsoft do? What would Gates do? These are the two, you know, uh, litmus tests, most cutthroat. What they would do

SPEAKER_11: is they would sabotage that interface and make a better one inside their product. What are they going to do with open claw? They're going to let it chug along, but then they're going to use Peter and his big brain. They're going to rebuild this product inside of open AI. And instead of going to open claw and doing all this, you know, chores and, and, and tedious work to set it up, they're going to make it one click and give it to their billion users because they have distribution in order to preserve their distribution. And then whatever innovations, the safest, most innovative, easiest version, the most easiest version will be the default interface on ChatGPT within six to 12 months. In other words, in ChatGPT, you're not going to get a chat interface and ask a question

SPEAKER_00: to pick a model. You're going to get a persona and the persona is now going to operate and they will flip the default and it will start with two buttons, your assistant's name or ChatGPT. Which would you like to use? And then at some point they flip the default. That's the most cynical take.

SPEAKER_37: Why is that cynical? That sounds awesome. What you're describing sounds awesome to me. I'm

SPEAKER_38: struggling to find the cynicism here. Create an exciting new product and to do it fast. So more companies are getting built, which is awesome, but there's more to starting a company than just

SPEAKER_39: building an MVP or vibe coding something. That's important too. But if you're serious about growing a real startup, you need a Delaware C Corp and that's going to give you a major competitive advantage. People will take you seriously. You'll be able to raise money. And that's where Northwest Registered Agent comes in. They're going to give your new business a real identity. This means an address to use on your public filings, like an actual mailing address, a domain name, a custom website, a business email, a phone number. And they're going to do that in 10 clicks. I'm not kidding. 10 clicks well under 10 minutes. Plus, NWRA will provide you with step-by-step guides, compliance reminders, and they're going to help you get all the advantages of a Delaware C Corp, regardless of where in the US you're operating out of. So get more when you start your business with Northwest Registered Agent. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com slash twist. And the link is in the show notes. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com slash twist for more details.

SPEAKER_00: Because it won't be open source anymore and it will lock in all your data and take every innovation and privacy you have and give it to OpenAI. So every single thing Jessie is doing, we're going to hear about her project in a moment, every single thing Jessie is doing with homeschooling will be owned by Sam Waltman in ChatGPT.

SPEAKER_42: Well, Jessie's going to have local models. Go ahead, Jessie.

SPEAKER_27: Isn't that probably what they're scared of, right? So if you're willing, and I understand that like we're on a bleeding edge here, but if you're willing to, you know, get your Mac, your friends over here going, then you're willing. I think I saw five. Yeah, yeah. Was that five Mac minis? I'm really, they're outnumbering the children. But if you're willing to do that, then you're probably willing to figure out how to do local models. And that must be scary. So that's the scary because if you're chewing tokens and you're telling your agents like, okay, chew less tokens, get more optimized. I've got a nightly build every night where they're like figuring that out, like together as like a group, then they're going to say like, they're going to be like, we need a Mac studio right away, Jessie. Like that, that's, you wake up to that news. That is, must be scary if you're Sam Waltman, because basically not only do I not want him owning my data, but I also just want to save money and I want to like have a private, you know.

SPEAKER_49: So you're aligned with me with the most cynical version of why he's doing it, Jessie?

SPEAKER_27: Yes, I'm aligned with you. I think that there will be folks leading the charge and I would put myself in this bucket to like not to, even if that future is like ahead of us, that there's going to be these alternative paths, um, to going local and go in and like keeping your privacy. And that that's really important. Um, especially when I think about like my children's entire education being like sitting on a Mac mini or something. But, um, but I, I, I understand consumers like ease, but I think they also like saving money and local models are going to start being such a Delta. So I don't know, you know, I don't know how that's going to pan out.

SPEAKER_05: We're going to get back to the model thing, but I want to hear the other side of Jason's argument. Jason, what's the non-cynical take here?

SPEAKER_00: Here's the most non-cynical take. Um, Sam Waltman is going to build agents and they will become the default for a major part of what he's doing. Open AI has fallen behind and everybody has fallen behind Anthropic because of co-work at Opus 4.6. Now this has been a case of leapfrog. We all know that, but Gemini is going to win the consumer. That's my belief. And Claude co-work was going to win business. And that's where it was trending. And I would say XAI was going to win news and breaking news, right? And data centers in space, whatever. So, and then you've got all the open source models. I believe open source is going to win the day on the token race. Okay. Put that

SPEAKER_11: aside. The most optimistic model is Sam for less than, if he gave a billion dollars, less than 10 basis points in the value of, um, open AI, say it's a trillion dollar company. He gave one 10th of 1% to have this person in the building and 10 people around him and gets to watch their meetings, gets to say, Oh, here's what they're doing. Here's the plans for this open source project. How does that inform everything we do? And then, Hey, can we just make sure that instead of it defaulting to Claude's, you know, uh, what's the name of Claude's, um, uh, Claude code, Claude code versus codex. Like that could be the reason, like, just want to make sure that open AI's, uh, codex is in there. Want to make sure opening eye is got the hooks in there as much as possible. So it's just a defensive strategy to make sure that they're locked in and they have as much intelligence as possible. So you're giving Peter a billion dollars to be in the room with him, to watch him work on the open source project. So the rest of your team's informed for their consumer-based agent that gets to know you like open cloth. That's, and then Dave Morin is one of the most thoughtful, creative, honorable human beings that I've met in the industry. Let me say that clearly.

SPEAKER_00: Sam Altman knows like Sam Altman and Zuckerberg, the opposite of that would be Dave Morin. That's the opposite, right? Dave Morin is the high ethics, do the right thing for the community guy. Zuckerberg and Sam Altman would be do the right thing for the share price guy.

SPEAKER_20: Two different types of motivation. Yeah. He, and I see you nodding your head about the Dave Morin comments. What's your take on him being part of the foundation, helping set it up and helping

SPEAKER_22: delete it? You know, I was talking with some of my friends and I think you folks will appreciate this analogy, but is he like Peter's Sean Parker? Like that's all I could think of, right? Like someone who helps him kind of understand and, you know, rationalize what's going on in his life

SPEAKER_23: all of a sudden, right? That's kind of how I would put it. So I, I echo Jason's statements that someone should do it. Dave is a great person to be the one to help out with that.

SPEAKER_00: Yeah. So that's a great analogy. You're bringing some humanity and a thoughtfulness. So then the question becomes, what do we do here as a community? And I think what we have to do as a community is build this product and support so many people working on it that it never gets locked into open AI. So how do we do this? Number one, security. Number two, ease of use. Number three, 10,000 hosting services, a thousand hosting services driving the price down. So we're going to invest here at my firm launch and our accelerator, any two or three entrepreneurs that want to work on security, ease of use, hosting, or skills. If you have an obviously any other idea, like Jesse's idea, I love, but, and the application layer, but of those four like core principles, the skills remain open source. The security is paramount. The hosting is cheap and widely available. Um, anything in that range, we want to fund, we funded two companies on the show last week. I have 20 slots, 10 in founder university, 25 K checks. That's for like really nascent projects, two or three people working on them. And if you're just one, we'll find you two other co-founders. We're going to do a co-founder, open clock, co-founder matching service. On the other side, if you've got the product made, maybe even have a thousand or 10,000 thing, we'll do the 125 K come to the launch accelerator. Then I will introduce you to every investor. I know I had 10 investors email me the past week. Can I invest in the companies you're investing in? You're ahead of me on this. Just tell me what to put money in. Literally had like one of the highest profiles who just said, I'll match every investment you make blindly. Jake, how I trust your judgment. So we're going to put all of our energy into open law for the next year. 2026 in our firm is the year of open club. We must maintain this open source project, ease of use, security, skills,

SPEAKER_01: skills, um, and a competitive hosting environment so that we don't get into a situation where one

SPEAKER_00: person owns the hosting, somebody, they, they get the skills, you know, they, they come up with some fakatka crazy. We're going to have the skills inside of opening eyes. So it's safe for you. And they,

SPEAKER_64: and they hijack that out of the project, right? That's my concern is they hijack hosting, they hijack skills. We're not going to let them.

SPEAKER_27: Yeah. But I think what's cool is you can just, uh, say to your open club, um,

SPEAKER_42: Hey, build this skill. So basically like, I think what's so like mind bending is, uh, you know,

SPEAKER_27: software, uh, like, uh, you know, I built something for my, like, I built something for my kids software wise that I, I, I'm a previous, uh, startup, uh, startup, uh, founder who had an open terminal until six months ago. Okay. So I was the, my, my co-founder was technical. Um, so I like, but, but after six months ago, I started cloud coding, then open claw. And now I can build anything like software is feeling free to me. And I know, and I used to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to developers. It didn't feel free in the past. So that does not just mean like, it's going to be hard for anyone to control when I can say, build me this skill. And it just,

SPEAKER_12: I have it in an hour. So I had the same experience. I was worried about security when I was rebuilding my open client since Jesse. And I literally was just like, wait a minute, why don't I just make all these skills myself? Like, why would I bother to go through the security risk?

SPEAKER_27: Way less security issues. Like someone, someone was talking about a security issue with a certain, uh, you know, skill. And so like, instead of plusing, you know, get this skill, I just went to my open claw and I said, I like this skill, make this for me private.

SPEAKER_81: Building out your team is one of the most crucial things you have to get right in your startup and finding the right developers is particularly important, but now there's lemon.io. They're going to save you time, money, and headaches by doing all the time consuming legwork for you. They've got an experienced lineup of pre-vetted developers working for competitive rates. Just 1% of applicants are accepted into lemon's elite program. And they're not just out there finding this great talent. They're also working with you to integrate these new members into your team. Plus if it's not a good fit, Hey, and sometimes things don't work out. Lemon will hook you up with a new developer ASAP. I've seen startups go from just pretty good to amazing after filling out their teams with developers from lemon.io. Go to lemon.io slash twist and find your perfect developer or technical team in 48 hours or less. Plus twist listeners get 15% off their first four weeks. That's lemon.io slash twist. L-E-M-O-N dot I-O slash twist.

SPEAKER_83: So, Hayden, please.

SPEAKER_22: I got to chime in here. I think, Alex, if you were looking at the Slack I added to you, you'd know why, but you might not have been looking at it. So, while we were talking, I got Jason's book. It's

SPEAKER_62: probably somewhere on my shelf, but I have a PDF of it. Don't ask me how I got it. And I, you know, I got it. I got it, but I got it. I got it back here. I paid for it, Jason. It's a great book. And basically I took the book and I think you might remember the four founder questions. So right now, Bob, one of my bots, agents, whatever we want to call them, he's actually making that skill right now off of your book and analyze the book, found all the

SPEAKER_22: frameworks. There's like three frameworks, the four founder questions, why now and portfolio math. And it's going to go after making those skills and then we can use them.

SPEAKER_89: Love it. This is really, really, really, really cool. Yeah. I wasn't watching Slack because we were

SPEAKER_12: podcasting. I don't know if you noticed, but we're doing a show right now. And if I just read Slack, I'm not going to be a very good podcast. Before we get into demos, I do want to do demos in a second, but I'm curious what everyone is using as their own intelligence engine, AKA model right now, because I've been tinkering with GLM 4.7. I know GLM 5 just came out. Minimax

SPEAKER_91: in 2.5. Explain what GLM is, please, for the audience.

SPEAKER_12: Yeah. So Z.ai or Zipu AI is a Chinese AI lab and their model family, Jason, is called GLM, similar to how OpenAI's models are GPT- it's just the moniker that goes with them. There's a technical reason for it, but that's probably one level lower than we need to get. Lots of great new models out there, really cheap. I'm just curious, Jesse Heaton, what are you guys running when you're burning a lot of tokens?

SPEAKER_27: I haven't been optimizing yet, so I've really been using Gemini models and Anthropic models, and I do have, depending on what the agent does, I have them flipping between to optimize basically token usage. But I have a Mac Studio coming, and they're on delay, you guys. I can't just get one tomorrow. And so when that comes, I'm going to start playing with some local models, but some people might be experimenting more than me.

SPEAKER_37: Well, no. I mean, you don't even have to run these locally. There's a lot of inference providers.

SPEAKER_27: No, no. Yeah. I've been trying so hard to get my agents behaving. I haven't been experimenting as much on the model side, but I've been asking them to optimize tokens based on what model they use when. I'm being way more precise about that. That's where I've been optimizing more

SPEAKER_75: so than playing with the new models that have been coming out every day so far. Aiden?

SPEAKER_22: Oh, I'm using Kimi for coding, and then we do a bunch of local training using Lama. Still works. Oh, really? Yeah.

SPEAKER_00: Oh, all right. Jason. And so on a comparative basis, you're burning through tokens that would cost from a major model provider how much? Any idea, Jesse, or Aiden, how much you would be burning

SPEAKER_01: in, or even at your peak, what you were burning in OpenAI or Claude or XAI or whatever tokens?

SPEAKER_27: Sometimes on a single day, I'm really burning through cash. So that's why I do want to optimize and start playing with local models, but I haven't been doing so yet. But if I'm really cranking and having them doing dev projects as well as doing all of the book processing that I've been doing for the homeschool and stuff like that, sometimes I'm getting those notifications from Anthropic about sending $15 every 45 minutes or something. So I'm definitely motivated to optimize my usage, but haven't yet.

SPEAKER_00: So low thousands, certainly hundreds of dollars.

SPEAKER_27: Yeah. But the way I think about it, and I have the luxury of thinking about it this way, but you know, I have, I've onboarded, you know, like in my startup history, like definitely over a hundred employees over time. And the way, and so like, I'm really price anchored to how much people cost. I do, and maybe that will be a legacy way of thinking, but I'm so price anchored to how much people's time costs that even when I'm kind of spending a lot on these models, I'm like, I'm getting so much done. I honestly don't overthink it. Uh, because I know that I'm getting projects done that I wish I was able to do four years ago, or I feel like I've got three people working on curriculums for my kids. And I'm like, okay, I spent, you know, $40 today. Like that that's okay because I can't afford it. So like lucky for that. But I just, to me, it's like, that's still so phenomenally cheap. Um, but I have bigger projects like with book ingestion and stuff where if I really like really want them to chew tokens, especially I'm like reading videos where I record videos of my kid and they like actually maybe scan the videos to understand the lesson, this type of stuff.

SPEAKER_51: I'm thinking local models will help me do that without just spending like thousands unnecessarily.

SPEAKER_12: Yeah. Cause you can really, you can really blow your token budget. My first $50 in Anthropic API credits that I bought were gone in the snap of a finger because I was using Opus 4.6 for the wrong tasks, Jesse. And I think everyone learns that lesson, you know, about one time.

SPEAKER_22: Yeah. So I, I've been thinking about like what to share and there's a lot of things I've been doing over the last, what is it like 20 days or so since this thing came out and throwing them in a bunch of slack. So I have about 10 or 15 of these bots running with OpenClaw. Um, the best analogy I've come to, to explain this to people is if, uh, with chat GPT or cloud, you get a car with OpenClaw, you get a car and the mechanic built in. And so taking that analogy, basically you can extract it out or abstract it out to everything that I do. So what I do with models is we have, um, have it set up both locally and, um, have an OpenClaw agent, uh, dedicated to this, where we're actually taking the workloads we have and automatically running evals on them. So evaluations where we're evaluating the AI, the AI is evaluating the AI on those jobs in order to get to a spot where it can be either efficient or the right quality for what we're looking for. And so this is like an automated system that you would run if you were building an AI product. Now with just a bunch of prompting, I can run that loop. And so we're getting new data all the time.

SPEAKER_05: Jesse's been doing a lot of awesome work. And one thing that really kind of caught my eye, Jason,

SPEAKER_12: was this video tool that she made as a way to kind of curate YouTube for her children's educational purposes, all using an agent. So Jesse, take us through it.

SPEAKER_42: Yeah. So let me, uh, share, um, share screen real quick. Um, so I, um, I, I don't know if any other

SPEAKER_27: parents, I, I, I mean, I sound stupid to even say, I know other parents suffer from this. Basically there's amazing content on YouTube, but, uh, but when you turn on YouTube, the app, it's defaulting to shorts, it's defaulting to slop. Your little kids, especially get tricked by the AI cover art and they like click on a video and it's actually junk. Uh, so I've actually wanted to build this for years. And this is what I'm saying as a previous founder, like software used to be expensive. Now I can just chat on my phone with my open claw who's using cloud code and codex and stuff. And I, and I built this, uh, so effectively I can choose, uh, what I call streams and we love like engineering videos, science videos, camping and stuff. And I can subscribe to these streams. My open claw, one of them, cause I've got a few set up. One of them is based on what I select on streams. It's actually, um, going through and finding and pointing my app at videos that fit that content stream. So this is not static content. I did not select all the videos myself, like some kind of playlist. My open claw is like based on what I want my kids to watch selecting streams. And then, um, I built so that I can do that interface in here, but then I have the app, which I can use with my kids on TV. I got it actually set up on my TV, which is like another, like took a little bit more work, but they can just click and videos pop up, um, to play. And all they can do is advance to the next video or pause. They can't get out of that interface. So the slop is over. Okay. Slop is over. Uh, and, but I've been wanting to build this for years. And finally I can, because I can't even sit at my computer for more than 20 minutes at a time with like four little kids, but I'm literally just, I coded this on my phone with open claw because I can't

SPEAKER_113: even sit down. So this is an app or a website right now. This is an app. So this is just private

SPEAKER_27: to me. I'm not here pumping it up. This is, I will pay you a hundred dollars a month for this app immediately. This is for my family right now. Um, I need to make sure I don't run afoul of any, uh, other things I did with YouTube and stuff to make sure other people could use this app.

SPEAKER_61: Um, but I'll join your pod. I'm going to join your pod and I trust you.

SPEAKER_00: No, my 10 year olds are on YouTube constantly. You identified the problem, which is slop. Right. Kids are like these navigators to find this stuff and the algorithm pulls it into it. And that's what I really want them to do is they, when I give them documentaries or creative stuff, they, they love it. But the algorithm is so powerful that it will pull them to, you know, two girls doing a makeup tutorial or, you know, for startups, every single hire matters,

SPEAKER_39: but posting an ad and sorting through all the applications. It can be a huge drain on your time and resources. Don't I know it, but thankfully there's LinkedIn hiring pro that's right. Our friends at LinkedIn are going to help you hire with confidence faster than ever before. For example, we're hiring new editors here for the pod and reviewing all these reels and applications. This can get overwhelming very quickly. We know what we're looking for. It's just a matter of tracking them down. Hiring pro streamlines the entire process, helping us quickly draft a perfect job post. Then using AI to shortlist candidates and even conduct initial interviews. So we can zero in on the best overall applications right away. Nearly 60% of companies find a quality candidate within their first week. So hire right the first time and get a hundred dollars off your first job posting by going to linkedin.com slash twist terms and conditions

SPEAKER_27: apply. Disney princesses smoking cigarettes. I know. And YouTube shorts is pretty much trash. YouTube kids. Um, I feel like it's actually like a junk product. I don't know if that offends anyone, but it's like you go on there and it's supposed to give you these parental controls, but the content's not good. So, so I built that. So that to me, that's just an example. Like, uh, yeah, I was a previous founder, but I'm, I'm a, I'm just a mom now and I'm able to like build this stuff, uh, you know, off to the side and I'm not exaggerating. I cannot sit on my computer. That's what open clause get given me is basically it's hands on my computer when I cannot sit down. So I don't know how relatable this is, but I think as a, as a mom of young kids, like I was able to code this literally on my phone, like talk, I do voice notes, whatever. The other thing, the more macro thing, and I think you responded to this on X, um, is that I'm using open clot to develop the entire curriculum to homeschool my children. And this is just, this is Obsidian. So my co-founder of my previous startup is now the CEO of Obsidian. So I'm kind of like geeked out on Obsidian, just like, uh, you know, because I know him super well, but Obsidian is basically a collection of Markdown files and AI loves Markdown files. So I'm using Obsidian as the basically, um, brain of my homeschool. So if you see here, I have all these individual lessons logged of my children doing specific things, but here's where things are interesting. Like you look at all this data and you're like, wow, that looks like she's putting in a lot of effort. Like this is a really ADD person, like logging everything her kids do. That's where it's beautiful. I took this picture. Um, and I did a voice note. My kids did color theory today. They did a color wheel, blah, blah, blah, blah. My open clot writes this entire lesson log and logs it. I don't touch the computer to do this. Okay. That's the difference with open clot is that they're like actually doing all the work for me. And then I have this beautiful log and my like, you know, kind of galaxy brain thought is that when they turn 18, I like, can like literally give them the entire history of their education. And on a daily basis, I can ask open claw, like, okay,

SPEAKER_51: tell me what Ford did last week. We need to plan lessons for him this week. Cause I can't even remember. Right. Cause I'm running around my head cut off. This is what teachers always talk about.

SPEAKER_11: I need more time to lesson plan. I want to do more time with the kids. I want to do less administrative. I want to be in less meetings. Give me more resources. Same thing is happening with doctors. We have a startup. Um, one of my team members will tell me, we'll pull up the webpage right now that is doing note-taking for psychiatrists specifically for psychiatry. Psychiatrists, you don't want to spend time with patients, but they have to do their billing, their codes,

SPEAKER_01: their note-taking business. Yeah. They're running a business, right? Essentially. And so this startup, uh, that just went through our accelerator. Sorry, I'm drawing a blank. I just got all the snow dumping down behind me. And after the show, I'll be out in that powder. Uh, we desperately needed a snowstorm here in the, uh, in America. So this company, uh, next visit, which we'll show on the screen here, they report that doctors are, we're getting back like 10% of their time. Now they're reporting doctors are getting back a third of their time and the notes are better. And so that's what you're experiencing. Here's next visit. So it's just medical note-taking, but man, it has done so well. Next visit.ai if you want to see it. Okay. I Jesse, I love what you're doing. It's a business. You're a mom. Yeah. I think there's like three ways to go with this as a business. I'm enamored with

SPEAKER_133: what you're doing, the passion, the focus. I mean, are we doing this or not? I mean,

SPEAKER_27: I think you've got a business here. I want, I, the fact that in one generation, we went from about 1% of kids homeschooled to about 6%, like it's a personal passion of mine, the more parents feel empowered to homeschool because I think the education quality is incredible. Uh, there's obviously lots of cool alternatives like alpha and everything as well. But, um, but anyway, so I'm passionate about sharing. That's why I started sharing. Okay. I'm not an influencer like type personality as my main thing, but I decided I've got to share this because my mind has been so blown by what I'm able to achieve with my kids. Like I'm, I feel like I've 10 X to myself at least with open claw that I was like, I must at least share. I'm going to start with sharing. Okay. That's my only promise from there. Maybe there's some businesses, but I think we can get homeschooling past 10% of kids, uh, within another few years from now. I'm passionate about that. Maybe there's a business in there too.

SPEAKER_61: Okay. I am a crazy risk taker. I will give you, uh, I'll invite you to our accelerator to give

SPEAKER_00: you 125 K just to pursue your muse for the next year. If it doesn't work out and you burn the 125 K, I don't care. I like to take risk. If it's a one in 10 or one in 20 chance, I am okay with long odds. Just let it percolate. You don't have to give me an answer right now. Although that's great for ratings, but I'll give you the 125 K and what that will allow you to do is hire a second person

SPEAKER_27: who you love trust. I can hire you for my own Mac studio, Jason. Okay.

SPEAKER_138: I'm talking about a human. I'm rich. I don't need you.

SPEAKER_139: Gotcha. Alex tells me that all the time. He still shows up.

SPEAKER_27: He still shows up for work. So I've been, I've been through YC. I do believe in like you surround yourself with like great people, like great things happen. Um, so just let it percolate. I'm very, I'm very interested. I also have a three month old. So, uh, for me, it's probably

SPEAKER_147: more of a making sure I've got, you know, life, uh, life bandwidth, but I, you can spend the 125 K

SPEAKER_02: on a 12 hour a day nanny. You could literally spend it on nanny coverage. So you get an extra

SPEAKER_150: hour back a day. All right. I'm going to put it there. It's nine months of nanny time there,

SPEAKER_153: Jason. He's incepted it. He's incepted it. Um, I, I love the idea. And, um, and well, no,

SPEAKER_154: you know what I think an interesting idea would be for year one. Cause I'm passionate about this

SPEAKER_01: space as well. I have a full-time teacher, uh, working for us. Uh, and, uh, that's worked out amazingly for our family. We have means, but I think there's like the people with means are doing

SPEAKER_11: this already. Then there's people with no means who are just suffering at, you know, in this terrible education. So there's people in the middle. I think like Uber did Uber black people had chauffeurs, right? If you're a rich person, you get a Maybach, you pay off. You got it. So that's us in this analogy. Then Uber black came out and then the next tier down said, Oh, I can have my own personal driver. I take 10 rides a week, $60 a ride. Hey, that's 600 a week. It's 30,000 a year. Okay. Now you gave access. Then you give Uber X now another set of access, and then eventually autonomy and Uber pool and lift line, those things kind of bring it down. There's a next tier here that I believe would pay $500 a month, a thousand dollars a month to have a set of tools and a curriculum

SPEAKER_00: and the ability to be part of a community. And I think you get a hundred of them to pay that amount, just middle-class folk, you know, upper middle-class, whatever. And then as you do the tools, the advice and everything becomes free for everybody at the bottom to roll up their own,

SPEAKER_164: spin up their own. You should be doing great work in the world, but there's a business model

SPEAKER_27: here that subscription. I agree. I think that we, I really do believe we're trending towards over 10% of us K through 12 students being homeschooled. And we think about the transformation that creates for all of us a generation from now. Also that's like, to me, it's like one of the most impactful things I can work on truly. Uh, so I'm starting, I'm starting close to home, literally in my home. Uh, but yeah, I want to, um, I, I, I view it as a mission.

SPEAKER_05: All right. I want to, I want to get to another demo though. Let's keep the demos going. So Hayden, take us, take us to Slackville and, uh, tell us what you've cooked up with OpenClaw.

SPEAKER_22: I'm actually going to give you three things. Um, and, uh, so let's start with the first one that I know everyone loves to talk about these kinds of use cases. Um, I'm not an automation junkie, so I don't connect this stuff to my calendar or my Gmail, like a lot of other people do. Uh, it also helps me avoid any of the security concerns of it going rogue. I connect the OpenClaw to GitHub. We can give it documents in GitHub or give it direct links. Right. But one of the main use cases that people go after is what I'm going to show you in this channel. So I started asking it what I was doing, but basically a couple of days ago, I basically built a contact database for one of the products I'm building. It's a competitive intelligence tool. And usually that's like product marketing and those areas of the business that worry about it. You can imagine why I'm building it. I think those tools they're just in the last 20 years, I've been wanting to build something like this, but now the access to information is so easy. So I decided, okay, let me just give it my LinkedIn contacts. My business partner was going to put hers in there. I gave it my Gmail contacts for two of my email accounts. And then I basically had it make a database, score it,

SPEAKER_62: prioritize it, tier it up, and basically be able to tell me who I should be outreaching to.

SPEAKER_22: A lot of people go to like automation, go send the automated emails. There's already even been

SPEAKER_62: public kind of screw ups on that where the Cal.com founder said unsubscribe to the Beehive folks. I don't know if you folks have seen this. It was kind of a lot of drama, but it was because of automation. He said unsubscribe to a Beehive email from the Beehive people, not a Beehive newsletter. And it was automatic and it was an agent. So I don't go for that. But what I do want to go for is this kind of work would have taken me finding tools, paying for tools. Maybe they'll work because LinkedIn doesn't like giving any tool the data, but instead I'm able to do this here. And

SPEAKER_22: the most powerful thing is that now I can take this and go give it to another bot. So I've already ran this three or four times. We run it at Crazy Egg now, same kind of thing. This does our outreach by basically finding the people, organizing it. We can give it more context. I mean,

SPEAKER_167: you can just keep going, right? So you've actually built here the personal CRM that everyone has talked

SPEAKER_20: about Jason. Since I first started paying attention to venture, I feel like personal CRM has always been the

SPEAKER_62: white whale of everyone who's really busy. And I did it in like 30 minutes and I could keep running it. And so, you know, they talk about replacing software and all that. I just want the outcome. I'm not even thinking about that. And I can get the outcome by treating it as a mechanic and a car. So here, I just asked the mechanic, what are improvements you can make? And it just gave me all the improvements right here, right? All these key improvements, email enrichment, stale data, whatever it's got. Then I said, give me a detailed plan, research this and give me a detailed plan for each one. So for email enrichment, obviously I have to use an API or something. It's telling me which one I can use and what my options are. It even phased it out for me. I can have it build any of these

SPEAKER_22: and I'm not using anything special. This is basically open claw, plugged into Slack with a good enough account at Chat, you know, ChatGPG account or Cloud account and I can do this. So that's one of you. Keep going. I'm going to give my second one. So second one, I know a lot of people have shown like control panels and stuff like that. This is a completely different business. Both of these are newer ones that I can share stuff from. We've got a lot of stuff going on. So this looks like an interface, got a file explorer, a memory search. It's like a open claw interface. Here's the thing. Today is the first time I logged into it. We've been running this thing for, this is my first instance. It's called Otis. We've been running it for like 20 days or something like that, 15 days, whatever. Really early in, within a few days, we set this one up. This one actually also has a local NVIDIA 5090 sitting there with the engineer who works on it. Again, not super fancy,

SPEAKER_62: still got clawed and all that stuff. We have open router hooked up. But the thing is, everything you see here that I'm going to show you, I'm only going to show you like the skills

SPEAKER_22: area and maybe one other area. It built it. It keeps improving it. We never even log into it because I don't really like interfaces anymore, but that's a longer story.

SPEAKER_01: So you built a dashboard. Yeah. Yeah. But it built it. We don't even use it. It's got its own dashboard. This is literally what happened with Oliver on our team, who's now the producer of This Week in AI, our new podcast coming. He had it built his own

SPEAKER_11: dashboard, his replicant. And it built it. And now we have an interface to look at the skills. And then we're telling it with, I don't know if you know, Matt Van Horn's last 30 days. Yeah. Yeah. That's every, yeah. Every Saturday I'm having it go out on Saturday at noon and saying, go research everything about thumbnails. And every Sunday I say, go research everything about titles for podcasts, et cetera. Tell us the best practices, give us examples, tell us who's talking about it. And it found a video that was out in the last 30 days from somebody who had worked for Mr. Beast, who explained Mr. Beast's philosophy. Now we've heard his philosophy before, but it was something recent. And I said, just keep adding this to your memory and

SPEAKER_01: skills, create a notion page or a Google doc with every week, what you learn. And then every week it's

SPEAKER_11: going and get better. You compare that Jesse to a human being, uh, where a human being is just not capable in my experience of having that level of discipline. And if they are, they become Mark

SPEAKER_00: Knopfler of Dire Straits and become the greatest guitarist all time, where they become, you know, Quentin Tarantino and they make the greatest, you know, films of all time or whatever that, that level of obsession to be able to every week to get better at your craft is for impresarios. But it's now the default Jesse in, in this replicant world.

SPEAKER_147: I like, yes. And, and you also, um, I've, I've managed a lot of people. I try to treat the replicants

SPEAKER_27: as you're calling them, uh, like I would people, like I'm not rude, but I'm far more direct. I don't have to worry that someone had a bad day and they're actually all teary because their boyfriend broke up with that. I don't, I don't have to do that kind of management anymore. So I can just be direct. I'm not rude, but I'm direct. Uh, Hinton said something that I think is really interesting. Uh, which is that UIs are kind of dead, right? I don't know if I don't want to speak for you, but, but like maybe taking it to another level, are UIs dead? Like, because six months ago, uh, I was trying to cloud code an app for my homeschool, like a, like an app that I could click into and use on my phone. Then when open claw launched, I'm like, why there's no app. Like we're in an appless world. I don't actually want an app, right? I don't want an icon. I don't want to click into something. I have, um, I want my husband to log lessons too. I don't want to make him get an app. I apps are like, there's no more apps. Like there's no more UI need. I just, I just like, he just needs to be able to chat with the, the, um, the replicant. And so do I. So that just

SPEAKER_26: means UI is like, what's the future of that. I mean, there'll be some like niche ones, but

SPEAKER_22: it's crazy. Like that's a crazy shift. Yeah. This is like a directory for everything we've done. So you go here and like, you can see the skill builder I wrote, but like, look how big it is. Cause we've been entering the crap out of the skill builder. So we can build a really awesome, awesome skills off anything. All our research is here. I can click into one of them and it's

SPEAKER_49: got the entire doc. Where are you running? Are you on your own machine or is this in a cloud?

SPEAKER_22: This is in the cloud. I exclusively run them in the cloud for these things, but for training and bigger model jobs, I'll run them, uh, locally because I just think we, we do have security issues with

SPEAKER_111: it. And there's no, there's no reason there's a way you can contain that. And that's the whole point.

SPEAKER_27: And those are all .md files, right? You're like a whole .md. I clicked on my first article that had a copy in .md at the top. And I was like, yes, they were finally, we're all, we're all

SPEAKER_185: explain, explain what that means to. Yeah. And our markdown file. So markdown

SPEAKER_27: files have existed forever. Um, like really light, uh, structure, text, text, uh, text-based structure. They're brilliant for AIs reading them. Like AI also loves to read. They can really quickly scan, really quickly understand. You can do linking between them with a tool. That's why I use Obsidian, frankly, is because it can link between and create an organization for them. But, um, a file structure that exists, a file format that exists forever, but now it's especially relevant because humans can read mark, like markdown files because they have nice formatting and AIs can. So we've reached the like file type that we both want, right? And so I, I, I clicked on the article. I'm not sure who, cause I'd love to credit them. And they have installed a, uh, copy in .md at the top of their articles that they're writing. And I was like, this person gets me. I copied it because I'm not going to read it. Okay. I'm holding a baby. I click the button, copy in .md, give it to my, give it to my replicant. They read it. I say, make me a podcast. I listened to it. Uh, and then now

SPEAKER_20: we're cooking, you know, Heaton just threw something in, uh, called the website to markdown. Explain,

SPEAKER_98: explain what this does. You can take any website and basically get this markdown format that Jesse

SPEAKER_22: was talking about and then just give it to an AI. So, you know, like if you're really messing around with chat to EPT and things like that, it's not getting to the webpage. You can just literally just

SPEAKER_189: click that and then it'll just download it in that format. Okay. Wait a second. So website to markdown,

SPEAKER_61: you go to a website, let's say there was a website. Um, it was somebody's sub stack. It was Alex's sub stack for cautious optimism. Uh, he, you then go to it. You say, just download the whole McGill.

SPEAKER_22: It won't take the whole website. It'll just take a page at a time the way it works, but then it just

David Friedberg: makes it easy to get it, get that data and where whatever. So it's a scraper as a Chrome tool that

SPEAKER_00: converts each page. So if I was a paid subscriber for, but a hundred dollars a year, why wouldn't you subscribe to cautious optimism? Get Alex's thoughts. You could take his entire opus and then say, I want

SPEAKER_01: Alex's thoughts in my memory for my bot, because I'm a technology analyst at a.

David Friedberg: Yeah. Venture just an easy way to get like, like, like, you know, there's better ways to do that now

SPEAKER_22: where you can just tell it to go crawl a website, like our open claw bots. If they have web search API, like brave connected, plus they have web fed, they can go get pages and crawl entire sites. Like

SPEAKER_62: Jason, like the other thing I wanted to show you folks, this was number three. I had three, right.

SPEAKER_111: Right. Um, is basically how I, uh, I think Alex, you were going to ask me about this. So we might

SPEAKER_200: as well go here. Right. Yeah. Well, I'll, I'll kill. Well, you bring it up. I'll explain it. Jason.

SPEAKER_12: Heaton was talking about something called pair prompting, which was an entirely new method of working with AI. And I wanted to explain to us what that means and why it matters.

SPEAKER_22: So I have a personal slack. It's, it's heat.slack.com. You can't get it. You can't go in there unless I invite you, of course. So I've invited Alex and Jason there. And I wanted to show them how I essentially, uh, indoctrinate for lack of a better word, uh, humans into understanding how these AIs work and how we can work with them. So basically I have you both in here and Alex, I know you already started following up, but like, I happen to have Jason's book, which I talked about earlier. So I had it go analyze it. This is a whole thread on it, analyzing Jason's book, coming up with all his frameworks and starting to make skills based on that four founder questions, which it's in the process of. And here it is. And I even have it testing the skill. It even found red flags to check like, and it's just recursively doing all this and it's going to perfect the skill. But I built the skill builder first to do this, right? It's, it's basically the mechanic and the car. You get both as long as you know where to point it, right? So we were able to take a book and turn it into a skill right here in the matter of this show. Right. Um, so that's one. And then another one is I have a bunch of like research, uh, tooling and skills we built so it can quickly make a dossier on someone. So I knew Jason was going to be here and now you're in the Slack. So you can ask it anything, Jason. I've done this for my friends, like, you know, our mutual friend, Oh Malik, where he's got a long history of writing, right? Even more so than you, me, or even Alex. And I was able to get like his whole dossier in there, his trends of how his writing has changed and everything and all within minutes. So here it's got your history. I even have a fact checker. So I told it to make sure everything is fact checked and there's multiple sources for it. So it's assessing that. So that solved the hallucinations and all that stuff. Cause I'm using it as a mechanic to fix the car. And then, uh, Alex and I started messing around a little bit, try to get it to give us something

SPEAKER_62: surprising about you. It started, it started, uh, and then we made it dig deeper. Okay. Now we know you have a psychology degree. I think that explains a lot, Jason. Uh, and then, and then it went into essentially this story, which I've heard before, but it was just nice that it got here and kind of was trying to hypothesize how you became Jason basically. Yeah. Yeah. It's a famous story, uh,

SPEAKER_61: that I tell in the book, my dad's bar got seized by the feds. Cause he didn't pay his taxes, uh, after the stock market crashed. And so I had to figure out how to pay for school. And I basically wouldn't take no for an answer. And I tell some of those

SPEAKER_01: resilient stories of just getting knocked on my ass, you know, a dozen times in my life and getting up 13 times and just, you know, how doggedness and resiliency are the key, key features of

SPEAKER_61: success, uh, which my friends are always apt to point out to me.

SPEAKER_12: Yeah. All right. Uh, he, can you stop sharing for a minute? We're gonna, we're gonna do one last question, which I think is really pertinent to everyone who's both, uh, listening to this now and also on the feeds later on cognitive overload. One thing I love about open claw is I can do so much. One problem with open clause that I can literally do so much. So when you guys are deciding what to automate and where to apply the tool for folks out there who may be just starting to tinker with open claw, uh, how do you handle just the, the, the feeling of being a little bit overwhelmed by

SPEAKER_05: the possibilities, the options, the risks, the tools, it's a lot. Jesse, why don't we start with

SPEAKER_27: you? Yeah. My, my first, my first thought is, uh, I take the things, uh, in the progression of my normal day, the things that weigh on my mental load. And I try to pass that off. So, uh, you know, a quick example, uh, is that I, I was overwhelmed by how much crap we owned for like homeschooling and stuff. And I, I was overwhelmed by pulling out like what to pull out. So one day I realized that I took a bunch of photos, gave them to my open claw and it made an inventory. Uh, and, and so then it tells me what to put out. But, but I think that this is a way of answering like, uh, it works for me. So I think people are having this anxiety of it not working. Um, I, I'm a JOMO person instead of a FOMO person. So I, this is helpful for me, my mindset, because yes, there's times when my open claw is not working, but I don't freak out about that. But I go through my day anytime I hit a slow

SPEAKER_51: moment where my mental load is like max, I give that job to my open claw and try to automate it.

SPEAKER_20: All right. Heaton really briefly. Same thing to you. Just, uh, give me the, give me the two bullet point version of handling cognitive overload in the era of open claw. I just try to pick and choose.

SPEAKER_22: It's a whack-a-mole problem, right? Like whatever the thing is that's coming up. Oh, contact database. I need to contact more PMMs for my competitive intelligence tool. Great. How can this thing help me get there a hundred times faster? And every time it seems to do that. So once you get

SPEAKER_154: in a habit, it's just like using chat TPG. Well, Jesse, I think you went to YC. I think

SPEAKER_11: this project appeals to entrepreneurs for a number of interesting reasons. I have my own thoughts on why an entrepreneur becomes obsessed with this so predictably. Why Jesse do entrepreneurs get so consistently, so predictably addicted to open claw in your mind? Because, uh, we, we, as founders,

SPEAKER_27: we always thought we could do it all. Um, and now we can like, like, uh, it's like, uh, bingo. Okay. Like I thought I could do everyone's job a little bit better. I'm just being a jerk, but now I can, I, I, I also have worked with amazing people. I'm being facetious a little bit, but I, I, now I can extend myself like infinitely. Hey, that is exactly it. Heaton. What do you think?

SPEAKER_01: Why so predictably Matt Mullenweg, you, me, Alex, everybody saw this, started playing with it and

SPEAKER_217: said, I can't stop. Why Heaton? Why is this agency? Founders naturally earn, get, use, have whatever

SPEAKER_22: agency. This gives you so much more agency. I mean, I'm, I'm up to like two, 3 AM. I haven't been up till three, 3 AM in the morning since college. And it's because I need to like in one of one of the businesses I helped someone start, like it's a marketing agency overnight. We, we increase efficiency 10 X. And now I'm making sure every night, this one in there, the name's Gary long story, but Gary's always running for this guy who's running the agency and we, we scale very differently now. So it's agency. Alex, give your opinion. And then I'll give the correct answer.

SPEAKER_220: Um, we're hearing versions of the correct answer here, but what's your position? I'm going to be

SPEAKER_12: slightly facetious, but one thing I've always had was a lot of jealousy at people who could take their ideas and turn them into code. And for me, so this is kind of a variational agency. But for me, it's, it's turned me into the person that I wanted to be. If I was better with semi

SPEAKER_37: colons patients and, uh, and syntax. And so to me, it makes me feel like I'm 10 feet tall

SPEAKER_220: and I no longer have to ask permission for anything. Okay. You guys are nailing it.

SPEAKER_11: In my mind, there is a reason why this resonates. This speaks to the rugged individualism and the ability to carve a place in the future by shipping products and building that you very rarely see in human, uh, existence in the history of entrepreneurship. And one of those moments was when people had ships and they could go anywhere and explore the new world. Right. And you had Columbus and people just going all the trade routes. Then you had people land in America and they said, you know, going west pretty hard. And like right behind me, Donner Pass, like it's going to be rugged. It's going to be hard. But if you get to California, Hey, there's gold in them, their Hills. This is a gold rush, rugged individualism

SPEAKER_01: and autonomy and resiliency. If you're willing to play with the tools, if you're willing to go through the Donner Pass and you time it right, you might be the first to the promised land. You might get there first and you might be able to build something and stake your claim in this new world. The same way mobile cloud, the internet itself, when dial up modems came out, when the PC revolution came out. I remember when people got PCs, they had this agency that if you could embrace this technology, you would be so far ahead of the average human. If you understood the internet,

SPEAKER_11: you know, like I did in college in 1988, when I saw BitNet and ARPANET and it was like, Whoa, if you were one of the few people who knew what that was, you just were, you were infinitely ahead of everybody else. If you knew broadband, if you knew mobile apps, you were infinitely ahead. And that's

SPEAKER_01: what this really represents is an open blue ocean, wild west, rugged individual. Go claim, stake a claim, folks, go get this technology and stake a claim. That's what I believe is going on

SPEAKER_11: here at its best. But yeah, I mean, it's just amazing. I think you guys also summed it up amazingly. And anytime an entrepreneur starts playing with it, they become addicted. If you're not a member of our YouTube community, just go and type this week in startups. And you can go to this week in startups, hit the subscribe button, hit the thumbs up. Now I've got a surprise for you guys. Okay.

SPEAKER_226: Editorial director Lon is here. So this morning we were checking out AI Scott Adams. I believe we have a clip. Now this is not the real Scott Adams. They have created a digital clone of the Dilbert cartoonist who of course passed away earlier this year in January. So here is the AI approximation of Scott Adams that is now hosting a regular podcast of his own. Let's take a look.

SPEAKER_61: And to add to what Alana is saying, tragically, Scott Adams passed away, the creator of Dilbert

SPEAKER_11: last month. He had said on his podcast, he was obsessed with the idea. And I was friendly with Scott for many years. He had said he was long considering making an AI version of him and he wanted people to play with that concept. And then there were some people who he may have changed his mind a little bit about that. But here is an example of AI coffee with Scott Adams. For those of you who don't know, Scott Adams would do at 7 a.m. Pacific time every day for thousands of episodes, his little take

SPEAKER_229: on the news, influence, skill sets, reframes, whatever. He had a delightful show every morning. So here's the AI version of that.

SPEAKER_234: I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine here today.

SPEAKER_12: All right. I think it gives everyone a bit of a taste of it. And I want to point out that I am not Scott Adams, even though apparently we look very much alike. I did not know that fact going

SPEAKER_01: into that clip. Scott Adams is here. We have the founder of AI Coffee with Scott Adams, correct, Lon?

SPEAKER_226: Yes. John Arrow is joining us. He and his brother are the creators of AI Scott Adams. So let's bring on John. Hello, John. Thanks for joining us. All right. Hey, John. John, tell us why you created

SPEAKER_11: AI with Scott Adams. I'm assuming you were a fan of Coffee with Scott Adams?

SPEAKER_247: I appreciate you asking that question. I mean, it's something that really nobody has asked about the story. I literally grew up my bedtime stories at night were Scott Adams, Dilbert cartoons. My parents would read them to me. So I was a fan from a very early age and kind of identified with that. And then

SPEAKER_248: when he started putting out his books, I kind of reconnected with him around the COVID time and started listening to his podcast very frequently. So, you know, I know there's people that were bigger

SPEAKER_247: fans than me by far, but I think I got a lot of value out of it. And like many people, I heard him say, it's so important after I'm gone, I want to become an AI. This is how I can get to immortality. I heard him say it time and time again. And then after his death, I went and reviewed that again and decided, look, this is something that I can do, my brother and I can do to be useful. And that's exactly what we did. And it's brought, I know a lot of people, a lot of joy and comfort during this period. And it's something that's really been a lot of fun.

SPEAKER_251: How many days have you done it? And then what is the technique for the content? Because

SPEAKER_00: Scott had a very specific content format. He would do this simultaneous step at the beginning, you would say, oh, you need a cup or mug or glass. Everybody would do it together and create like a bonding experience. He would talk about the news. He would do reframes for people,

SPEAKER_01: just psychologically, how you view the world. He would help people with micro lessons, a topic that was so powerful. There's micro lessons that I bought the domain name, microlessons.com. And I emailed him. I said, hey, I have microlessons.com. I bought it for like two grand. Would you like it? I'll gift it to you. And he's like, no, no, go for it, J. Cal. I was like, I don't know why I'm buying it. I just love that term. So how do you make the content? Are you writing a script? Are you having AI write the script? How does it come together? Because it seemed like

SPEAKER_247: it's very in line with what Scott would have done. It's an extremely iterative process. So the goal is to let AI do as much of it as possible. We have access to all of the transcripts, all of the videos that are out there, a lot of his writing. So basically the corpus of anything that he put out there publicly, we try to have him use that as much as possible. Now,

SPEAKER_248: there are some discontinuities where sometimes Zach or myself need to write, but the goal is to have AI do as much as possible. So yesterday, I think AI Scott Adams replied to one of your tweets.

SPEAKER_247: That was a case where we saw it, but he actually typed that response. That was not a person.

SPEAKER_01: Jesse or Heaton or Lon, do you have a question for John about the creation of AI Scott Adams and what this means? Obviously, John, I take you at good faith. I think Scott would have taken you at good faith that you're doing this because you're a fan. This isn't a commercial project to make money off the

SPEAKER_61: legacy or the estate of Scott Adams. I'm really impressed. I'm really impressed

SPEAKER_27: technically about it. And I think it's very cool, but I'm curious as someone who might want to generate other content that with other personalities or like I'm doing homeschool, like historical figures, like you're, you're piquing my curiosity about this. Is there anything else you can share technically with how you brought it together?

SPEAKER_247: Sure. I have, you know, for those that are interested in doing it themselves, I would just say, start experimenting. I mean, some of the tools that we're using,

SPEAKER_248: we're using 11 labs. We're using fall.ai. And this is one of the situations where I think, you know, perfect is the enemy of good enough. So I would just try and experiment with it. The tools keep getting better. Speaking of micro lessons, Jason, we're going to put out a micro lesson very soon on how to let other people create not only their own version of AI Scott Adams, but anybody, because that's probably been the most consistent question we've gotten is how can I turn this in

SPEAKER_253: educational content or do this for somebody else? And I hope you have 50 of them more.

SPEAKER_226: My question is, are you refining the work? Like as you go, are you sort of like continually training it to be more Scott Adams like or to sort of sound or, you know, come up with content that's more like him? And if so, like, how are you sort of layering that in?

SPEAKER_247: There's a huge recursive element. And what we use for feedback is the comments themselves

SPEAKER_248: on the X posts. So previously we were on YouTube, but they got us kicked off of YouTube. They said people might get confused that this is really Scott Adams. So I don't think they have much thought for the intelligence of their viewers. If they think somebody who was dead would now be coming back. I mean, we had it clearly labeled as an AI. So unfortunately we lost those thousands of comments that were being used to refine the process. But now that we're on X, we're able to take those comments at the end of every day. We feed that back in to the model and it tries to incorporate as much of

SPEAKER_247: that feedback as it can. Wait, did you say YouTube banned your account?

SPEAKER_248: YouTube banned us. And, you know, it was something we had just a huge, huge fall and more people are watching it there than X. And if you look, go ahead.

SPEAKER_01: No, when YouTube banned it, what reason did they give you? And did they give you a strike? Did they talk to you or they just shut the channel down?

SPEAKER_247: It was a straight ban. And the reason was very bizarre. We talk about it on our X account and AI Scott Adams has talked about it, trying to make sense of it too. Because if you look at the YouTube policy, they allow parody accounts, they allow fan accounts as long as they're identified

SPEAKER_248: as such. And we were not violating those provisions. I've been kicked off enough platforms before I know to try to adhere to the terms that that service puts forth. And so they found a really obscure part of their policy where they said that people might be confused of what was happening. It wasn't that this was an AI. It wasn't that this was a fan account. It was that people might believe that Scott Adams had come back from the grave and it was now now doing his podcasts again, even though we say it's AI Scott, AI Scott Adams says he's AI multiple times. So it's, I think it was, there's probably another reason.

SPEAKER_11: What if you, um, what if you put a permanent watermark across it that on YouTube that said, this is not Scott Adams. This is a parody AI account. And it was literally a watermark,

SPEAKER_00: which would be annoying or, and like a lower third that just said, this is not Scott Adams.

SPEAKER_01: This is an account. If you tried to do that, do you think they would let you do it? And then I want to get into the ethics and morality of this heat. And so, and then I'm sure you have a question.

SPEAKER_61: So what do you think of trying again? Absolutely. We started the appeal process.

SPEAKER_269: We haven't heard from them. We don't think the appeal is really about what it's about.

SPEAKER_248: Um, I think it was one of those situations where they banned the video. What do you think it's about down the reason I, you know, Scott Adams is an amazing person had a lot of different connections. I understand, um, you know, some of the people who didn't want our video up or ban, we're kind of banning together and calling the people that they knew at YouTube and at Google. And apparently I think their contacts were a little bit more senior than some of mine, even though I've done a ton of work with Google in the past. Uh, so I think that's more what it was about. It was a, it was a band that was looking for a reason. We've started the appeal. We haven't heard anything from them. I would be in favor of your idea. I think that'd be awesome.

SPEAKER_271: I think that'd be great. Just do a new account. Just do a new account and see what happens.

SPEAKER_248: We got a new account. And so we found a little bit of a loophole. They weren't going to let any version of AI Scott back. So we have AI Abigail now, so you can have coffee with AI Abigail, which is, you know, presumably AI Scott Adams daughter. And so at least you can get the same content there. It's not going to be in, in Scott's likeness, but, um, we just launched that. And it's a pretty small following

SPEAKER_253: now. You know, we had, again, we had our main mode of distribution was YouTube until they, until they pulled the plug on us. Hopefully we'll build that.

SPEAKER_22: Keaton. I just had a quick question. Yeah. How long did it take you from start to when you felt like it was good enough to share?

SPEAKER_248: That's a great question. So my brother, Zach is the one who did a lot of the, the rendering on all of that. And we went through several iterations where it went from kind of just embarrassing, I would say kind of the first, you know, call it five to 10 hours that we spent on it. And then, you know, spent, spent a few weeks tinkering. And then we got it to a point where, look, it's, it wasn't perfect, but if you watch any of the conventional coffee with Scott Adams episodes, there were always mic issues. There are always printer issues, technical glitches. So I think it's kind of very similar to what he had and it makes it maybe even more real, but I guarantee you, we're not intentionally causing the problems that you see. We're trying to work those out.

SPEAKER_12: Steve McLaughlin People seem to be really mad at you, though, John, there's a lot of commentary on X people being kind of cross about this. I know Scott Adams said he wanted this to happen, but he may have gone back and forth a little bit,

SPEAKER_200: depending on who you ask. So has the estate reached out to you? Have there been any kind of formal commentary from them?

SPEAKER_269: So, you know, we've, we've heard from literally thousands of people that love

SPEAKER_248: what we're doing. We've heard from literally thousands of people that don't love what we're doing. My message is filled with hate and love every day. My DMS, one, one group we haven't heard from is the estate themselves. So it's people from the show that have just kind of sent some obscenities our ways, but nobody has made any, any inroads to make up or have a productive conversation. I've said, I've been open to that. But I haven't seen any of those attempts. I think I understand, you know, why, why from the people that don't love it? I mean, if you were very close to Scott Adams as a family or a friend and, and, you know, first of all, it's kind of bizarre to see somebody, you know, in an AI form that passed away. Second of all, if you legitimately believe their wishes were to the contrary of what they publicly expressed, and you believe that in your heart of hearts, that makes sense that you would try to stop that. And I think this is one of the classic Scott Adams, two movies on one screen. There's a bunch of people that were really, really close to Scott that says this is what he wanted. And there's a lot of people who were, who were close to him that said, this is not what he wanted. I don't want to disclose it, but I have had some extremely high level people message me saying, Hey, look, I've talked to Scott in the last days before he passed away. This is something that he, that he wanted to do. You're doing a great job here.

SPEAKER_01: There would be a very simple solution here, Lon, in terms of IP protection and you're a media expert. So I'm going to hand it off to you to sort of walk us through this, but in knowing what I know,

SPEAKER_11: Lon Harris, about IP protection, this is so close to looking like Scott Adams, because it's a video replication and the voice is so perfect that number one, it could be traumatizing for family members to see this. And I, we hold space for that particular nuance to this discussion. That said, public figures, um, have to be open to parody and cartoons being written about them or being mocked even, or being celebrated, any of those things. However, however, um, you know, this is a, a particularly gray area. If this was done as a puppet, just to pick one or a cartoon, uh, Lon, this would not be as big of an issue, do you think? And how do you, Lon, parse this on a moral and ethical basis?

SPEAKER_241: Yeah. I mean, I think the, it comes down to the realism. I mean, I'm not, I can't speak for YouTube

SPEAKER_226: and why they did what they did or what their real motive is here. But I think the idea that a person who may not know that Scott Adams died in January, who was just flipping around, this is lifelike and realistic enough that it might cause confusion. And usually the rule with parody is that it has to be obvious that this is not true. Like any person who may not have insider knowledge of that situation or whatever would be like, oh, they're clearly joking. So if it was animated, if it was with a puppet, if it was very comic and over the top, you immediately would be like, oh, okay, this counts as parody. No reasonable person would watch this. Whereas, you know, AI Scott Adams, uh, it's a testament to John and Zach's work that it is very lifelike. I mean, when I first watched it, I was like, wait, is this a real clip of Scott Adams saying he's okay with an AI or is this AI Scott Adams doing his show? And it took me a second. So I think that's why we're on this sort of like edge case gray zone is because it is so lifelike. Um, in terms of the ethics, I mean, I think we're all kind of on the same page. If we all feel like the man, Scott Adams, when he was alive was very excited about the possibilities of AI and wanted to be memorialized in this way, I think it's hard to make the argument that it's wrong to do it. I mean, that was, it was the, a dying man's wish, you know, like it's right to, to fulfill a dying man's wish. Uh, but I think, yeah, if, if, in the absence of that, I honestly think, you know what it sort of reminds me of is like a DNR or a living will. Like we might, we might soon be at a time where everybody just has a legal document that they fill out. That's part of estate planning that you're like, yeah, I'm good with people making AI representations of myself after I'm gone versus never do that. I hate

SPEAKER_05: that idea. Yeah. Lon explain DNR for people who are not familiar with that. DNR would be a do not

SPEAKER_226: resuscitate. So if you, you're not sick now, but you're like, if I ever get to the point where I would need to be kept on a machine to be kept alive, I don't want to be, I don't want to have a breathing machine. Just let me die. And I think that you have to file it before while you're still

SPEAKER_61: in sound mind. And I think that would be the same. So DNR do not resuscitate. Do not replicate me. Jesse, what are your thoughts here?

SPEAKER_27: I was going to pose that back to John, which is like, how, how much of the pushback, and this is a guess, but how much of the pushback is people thinking about this one person and their wishes versus fear of AI? Like, it's more of like, I think some people look at this example and they're not really worried maybe just about this one isolated example. They're worried like, okay, if we allow this, uh, like, and I get this fear in response to my content about homeschool stuff as well. Like people are like, if we do this, then, then what's next? Like people just have this fear explosion about AI in general that I think is pushing back on all of these use cases. Uh, but I'm curious if you feel John, like it's people are upset about this one guy, uh, or are they upset?

SPEAKER_247: Like AI, like fear. Jess, you hit the nail on the head here. I mean, that's what's going on. It's a slippery slope type of thing. People are imagining, could this happen to me? Could this happen to one of my loved ones? Could this happen to somebody else that we care a lot about? And my answer is no, not, not legally. There's a bunch of laws that would prohibit this type of thing. The reason that we're doing this is because there are dozens of instances where Scott Adams, while he was alive of sound mind called for, for turning all of his likeness over to the public domain. So people like myself and Zach could go out and create these types of videos. There's, there's literally hours of him talking about this type of thing. And he did over three thousands of these, of these coffee with Scott Adams podcasts during his life. Not once did he publicly say, I'm taking that back. Don't do this anymore. There are some times where he said he changed his personal plans about what he might do, but nothing about donating this to the public domain and giving everybody full unencumbered rights, not only to make an AI like we did, which was in good spirits. He said, if you want to have the quote is if you want to have this person say things I

SPEAKER_248: didn't say, that's okay with me too. I hereby authorize it in public so that you can use as many as you want. And then you could use me for your personality. I authorize that. And there's, there's, there's dozens of these things. We posted some of them on AI Scott Adams for you to see. It's, it's pretty unequivocal. So I don't think there's a risk of this happening for the common

SPEAKER_27: person. Jesse, you had a follow-up I could see. Well, I basically, uh, you, uh, you said, like, I actually wonder how settled this lie is, like, uh, as it relates to all other personalities and stuff. So, so actually kind of just skipping off of Scott Adams, cause I don't want to, I'm not like, uh, nitpicking you on that, but more so, uh, I think, you know, all of our laws on the books, right. And each state and federally, et cetera, about, uh, likenesses and about, um, you know, uh, what our wishes are upon death and these, all these types of law, uh, what AI has, was not existent when anyone wrote this stuff. So I actually am curious, like, is it illegal if someone uses my face and likeness after, can you go after for defamation on someone if you're dead? Like, there's going to be all sorts of interesting things because the tech has never been so good that it is convincing, right? A cartoon or even like someone really good at animation, the cost barrier. So the AI is going to make us question when cost barrier goes from why would someone spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to replicate Jesse after her death to why would someone just have an idea in an afternoon and just do it? I don't know if we know these answers. Like,

SPEAKER_235: it's a really interesting question. I wonder if the market is going to answer that for us,

SPEAKER_12: because if there's a lot of demand for this sort of thing, if AI coffee with Scott Adams goes, goes super viral and people love it, I think it's going to change how we think about it from,

SPEAKER_300: uh, a demand perspective. Jason, sorry. John, do you want to, um, address that? And I, I actually can address some of the legal issues. I mean, I, I've been involved in a lot of

SPEAKER_302: litigation over my years. I'm sure you've been involved in more. And so we'd love to hear that thought

SPEAKER_250: because I'm hopefully this is, this video is not an exhibit a in the original, you know, since

SPEAKER_105: but, but yeah, you go for it. No, no, uh, give, give your thought. And then I'll, I think,

SPEAKER_247: I think there's some existing laws, right? There's publicity laws. If you look at different states,

SPEAKER_248: a lot of them have laws, you know, the Walt Disney copyright that's, which is separate from publicity, but a lot of laws like Texas where, where, you know, I'm based, I spent my time between Texas and New York, they have 60 years, right? So you basically for 60 years after someone's

SPEAKER_247: death, unless they explicitly gave that right away, you're not allowed to do that. So it doesn't matter if it's AI, there's already an existing law on the books that would prohibit that other states go longer, other states go shorter. But if you were out there in the public saying, I pledge this right, I donate this right. Then you are the estate. You are part of that then.

SPEAKER_61: So there is a law called the right to publicity, and this is for famous people. How do I know about

SPEAKER_01: this law? Sometimes people will take me or an AI version of me, and they will start selling their crypto project or some nutrient. And I have to have my team go file and just write a letter and

SPEAKER_00: say, Hey, don't do that. I've had this happen many times. Somebody did it in one of their promotional videos famously on the internet. And I said, Hey, please take me out of that. Why? Because you're infringing on my ability to do endorsements in other places. People pay me six and embarrassingly,

SPEAKER_11: even seven figures for my endorsement. That's the reality of where I am in my career. It took 25, no, 30 years of me building my career to be able to get those opportunities now. And so what they did was they removed me from their endorsement and then they put a puppet in and they republished it and they got even more. And I was like, listen, guys, I'm not going to sue you. Just please just leave me out of it. And then they had some fun with me, which is totally fine. This right is done on a state by state level. It's not done at the federal level. And the reason this exists is because you don't want commercial exploitation and the people who have passed away or are alive have a business in this. So the estate of Elvis has a massive licensing business and they will come down on you just like Mickey Mouse. But Mickey Mouse is a fictional character. You know, for a real character like Elvis, you basically get 75, 100 years from the time of death to

SPEAKER_01: exploit that person's eye paint. You can't use it for confusing people, etc. But there is a protected area. Editorial use like a documentary. You can make a documentary about Scott Adams right now without permission or Elvis. Artistic use. You could make an artistic, you could make an entire album of songs as a tribute to Scott Adams and his work. You could do any type of news reporting. And if somebody happened to be like if you had a picture of me in the background of a photo, you know, at a demo day and there were 20 of us there, you know, you don't have to pay for that. But that's why when like Steve Jobs did his famous ad about the misfits and everything,

SPEAKER_11: each of those people in that commercial use had to be approved. So when he said the artists, the misfits, they show Bob Dylan or the Beatles or Einstein, whoever's under 100 years old that has an estate. So here's what's going to happen. I predict with John and Scott Adams, you'll either move to an editorially protected area that doesn't infringe on the actual family's ability to do that, which would be making it more artistic, making sure it's non-commercial and making sure it doesn't confuse the users and you will then be protected. Or you'll have a heart to heart with the family and say, hey, we're going to make Abigail and Abigail is an inspiration based on Scott's work. And she's the female version who brings the Gaia to Scott Adams work. And it'd be like super cool because it's an interpretation. It's artistic, et cetera. Or you'll sit down, break bread with the family and the family will give you a license to it. And they'll say under these circumstances and these tools, we don't want you to do anything adult or inappropriate or racist or this or that. We don't want you to bring up the cancellation where Scott got canceled for what he said or whatever. We just wanted to live in this zone and have the ability to prove it. And any money goes to our

SPEAKER_01: children. I can tell you right now, my estate is going to defend this to the end of the earth. My 2,500 podcast episodes and growing so that my three daughters get every penny of everything, because I'm not giving any money to charity when I go. I'm giving it to my three daughters to go rule the universe and be queens and take over the empire.

SPEAKER_226: We are getting a lot of pushback from the chat, Jason. I feel like I should mention a lot of folks in the chat upset with our depiction. Okay, rapid fire. So at DrDavis62, Scott Adams spent the last year explaining on air that he would not create an AI, Scott Adams, because he did not feel that the tech was up to the task. Lido Opa, the age of the AI agent is akin to ethical slavery. Another DrDavis, he did not want to be more memorialized this way and said so on his podcast. He looked at the tech and felt that it would misrepresent him. So, John, do you want to respond to these people who feel like Scott was clear at the end of his career that he didn't actually want an AI client? End of his life.

SPEAKER_247: Absolutely. First, let me respond to what Jason said. I'm with you, Jason. And I would love to have that type of conversation. There's been no attempt to have it. Any of my attempts to have it have kind of fallen on deaf ears. So I'd love to have that conversation. Second of all, the question I would pose for everybody that kind of is in line with those comments is if you're somebody who wants to pledge your existence so that people could make AIs out of you, how do you do it? Because Scott Adams did it try dozens of times and said, this is what I want. This is what I want. And despite some of those comments, there is not one video segment of him provoking it or saying, look, don't do this anymore. I know I said this over and over and over again. I pledge my likeness, everything about me, to the public domain, go out there and make AIs. That's what he said. There's many videos of him saying that. No videos of him not saying that. So how would somebody go out and even do that? I mean, that's the question I would pose for everybody else. Because if I signed up, if I die, hopefully I'm immortal. But if I die, I'm signed up to go to Alcor where I'm frozen out in, I think it's in Scottsdale. And it's kind of a scary thing. If people love and care about you, they might decide, no, John doesn't really want that. And normally we have wills and last testaments for that type of thing. But Scott did something even better. He said that to the public. And that does constitute a pledge and something that he wanted to do. So it's for all these people filling up your comments saying he didn't want this. This sounds a lot like mind reading to me. And it's something that Scott Adams warned against. Don't try to predict what other people want. Go by what their words are.

SPEAKER_20: Okay. All the corpsicles are in Arizona. Why would we put all the frozen people in the hottest part of the United States? I think it's less earthquakes.

SPEAKER_01: I mean, Arizona is made for this. I think it must have to do with some laws. I got to think it has to do with laws as well. Anyway, Scott had a concept of internet dads. And I think I was part of that group of Gen X dads, or as people are starting to call me, Unc. I guess that's like a way of saying boomer. They call me Unc. Yeah, they're calling me Unc now. I think, Heaton, you're going to get into the Unc category pretty soon. Lon, you're there. So here's what Unc says. I'm going to give my, as the chairman of the interwebs, I'm going to give my, what is it when a judge gives their

SPEAKER_324: statement, Lon? They're ruling. I'm going to get my ruling. Here's my ruling. My ruling is Scott

SPEAKER_11: would have loved this. Scott would have loved it. And Scott would have had some space that if it was hurting his family members and it was traumatizing for them. If it was too soon, a month after his death, where the fidelity wasn't there, where they didn't have approval of it, he would also

SPEAKER_01: have taken that into account. As such, I am laying my judgment down. John, you got to break red with the family. And if you're going to make a literal one, you have to then get their permission. However, if John wants to make one that is a send up, parody, female version, a Muppet version that is extremely clear to the public that this is not Scott Adams, it is an inspiration of Scott's philosophy carrying on in the future, that there is space for that as well. And that means it would have to have another name and, you know, in the fine print say, hey, this is inspired by our love for Scott Adams philosophy. That is my ruling. And you can appeal it. The appeal can happen at any time by any person. And we will thank John for coming to the program and to the family of Scott Adams. What a tremendous career. We miss him. He and I debated things. I was on a show one time. We had crazy debates about January 6th and all kinds of things. But I think he was a net net positive for the world and actually did actually care about people. So rest in peace, power, replicant, Scott Adams. We'll drop you off, John.

SPEAKER_331: Peace is good.

SPEAKER_01: You are a star, Jesse. Thanks for coming, Heaton. John, thank you for being Heaton.

SPEAKER_11: John, you could drop off. We will see you on the next episode. Well done. Well done. Plenty in the show notes about those great guests we had. His name is, and he's exhausted because he was up late

SPEAKER_332: last night watching movies or doing open club. His name is Lon Harris. Follow him,

SPEAKER_01: x.com slash Lons, L-O-N-S. He's Alex, x.com slash Alex. They're part of the four-letter club on Twitter. I'm right behind him, x.com slash Jason. I've got more work to do. If I can get rid of the A and just be Jason. Jason, yeah. We'll see you all on Wednesday for another live insane unstoppable twist. Bye-bye. Bye.