SPEAKER_00: What's interesting about this is we're now starting to see a couple of different cohorts. You got the non-Mag 7, I'll call native models, OpenAI, XAI, Anthropic.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Then you got the Mag 7, in some cases, pursuing models. I understand Amazon has a model now. Apple was doing something in vision and images. This is Microsoft, obviously. We know Gemini doing very well at Alphabet. And then Meta has Llama.

SPEAKER_00: And then you got the Chinese companies coming in with DeepSeek and Moonshot, Baidu. And I guess the question is, we're now in a game of chicken.

SPEAKER_04: With these companies, who can keep building data centers, keep raising money, and then race towards the cliff, hoping that the cliff turns into a bridge, with the bridge being revenue, and customers willing to take out their wallets and give $20 to $200 a month,

SPEAKER_06: you know, $250 a year to $2,000 a year to use these platforms.

SPEAKER_07: This Week in Startups is brought to you by AlphaSense. Get deeper insights into your business with the power of AI search and market intelligence. Start with a free trial at alpha-sense.com slash twist. AWS Activate. AWS Activate helps startups bring their ideas to life. As you build and scale your business, Activate Credits grow with you to support your changing needs. Apply to AWS Activate today and receive up to $100,000 in credits. Visit aws.amazon.com slash startups slash credits. And .tech. Say it without saying it. Head to get.tech slash twist or your favorite registrar to get a clean, sharp .tech domain today.

Chamath Palihapitiya: All right, everybody. Welcome to This Week in Startups. I'm your host, Jason Calacanis. We do this show Monday, Wednesday, Friday. And with me, again, my co-host, Alex Wilhelm.

SPEAKER_00: How are you doing, brother? I'm doing fantastic. Great. Happy Friday. And the editorial director at my investment firm, Launch, and my media company, This Week in Startups, Juan Harris, we've got a big docket here, big docket energy.

SPEAKER_15: And I know we've been working on twist bets, and we now have all the wagers starting to come up. You can pull that page up, and we'll see where these things wind up. But we have the unemployment rate bet. That's going to come due at some point.

SPEAKER_04: And, oh, wow, we have to make sure we have this bet clear.

SPEAKER_16: Below 5%, 5.5% in six and 12 months. So we made two bets. Oh, got it. Yeah.

SPEAKER_17: I was going back to the transcript, and it turns out when you and I banter about a bet, sometimes it's slightly hard to figure out exactly what we were wagering on. So I'm trying to make sure I'm as fair as possible to everyone involved with these discrete wagers.

SPEAKER_19: Confirming the bet, because I've been involved in a lot of these side bets in, like, my poker groups and et cetera and degenerates. What they do is they restate the bet on text in front of everybody else and then confirm the bet. And so now everybody has it. You screenshot it, and you put it in your calendar, and then you settle up.

SPEAKER_17: So we're going to have that up with its own URL, hopefully by next month. Well, actually Tuesday, Jason, because we're not going to be here on Monday.

SPEAKER_23: It's going to be a holiday here in the States.

SPEAKER_22: Oh, my goodness. We're taking a holiday now. What is happening? We were, like, so good about just working hard, and now everybody's taking an actual day off.

SPEAKER_25: Labor Day, the bane of your existence. Labor Day, the worst one of all. Labor Day.

SPEAKER_19: It's like, it's Labor Day.

SPEAKER_26: We should all work a 12-hour day. What are we talking about here?

Chamath Palihapitiya: It's in the name, folks. All right. Where to begin, Lon? I see that you are on the program, which means there's something going on in pop culture land.

SPEAKER_31: Yeah. So I think we need to talk about Netflix's K-pop demon hunters. I have watched the film. I'm not sure if you two. Jason, you have daughters. I'd imagine you might have seen it by now.

SPEAKER_15: They're so into this show. Yes. They're watching it. They're trying to rope me into it. I don't know what it is.

SPEAKER_31: It is now the number one most streamed Netflix original film of all time. It just took out red notice this week. 236 million views. It was also the number one theatrical movie at the box office last week. Netflix had in about 1,700 theaters across the U.S. Saturday and Sunday only, they had sing-along versions of the movie. And it came in number one, $18 million at the box office. It bested weapons, Freaky or Friday, Fantastic Four, all these late summer hits. And another record, four songs from the film are on the Billboard Hot 100 this week. That is an all-time record for any movie soundtrack in history. Wow. So I mean, all that's interesting that a Netflix original is blowing up to this insane degree. But I think what makes this even more interesting, this movie was actually produced by Sony Pictures Animation during the pandemic. They had a pandemic-era deal with Netflix. Netflix and Sony produced these movies together. Netflix gives Sony back the full production budget, plus $20 million per film. And then they released the movies directly on Netflix. Now, that seemed like a good deal for Sony during the pandemic. But now Sony has lost this IP that could have been like a huge franchise. Now they have to share this huge IP with Netflix when it could have been,

SPEAKER_39: I mean, this could have been a billion-dollar grossing theatrical.

SPEAKER_38: It could have been their Marvel, you know, their next Spider-Man. Sony has a couple of things, right?

SPEAKER_19: They own the, they, when Marvel was but a comic book company, they sold the different comic books.

SPEAKER_41: Right, they kind of share Spider-Man with Marvel now.

SPEAKER_31: But this has been a big pain point specifically for Sony. Just last year, CFO Hiroki Tatoki said in an interview, whether it's for games or films or anime, we just don't have that much IP that we fostered from the beginning. We're lacking that early phase of IP, and that's an issue for us. Well, here's an example. They actually hit a Grand Slam home run, but they sold it to Netflix before they even had a look at the movie, and so they didn't get the huge benefit out of it. So, I mean, that's what's going on. They're working currently, Netflix and Sony collaborating on a sequel, but this could have been billions of dollars for Sony that they sort of-

SPEAKER_44: So they still own half of it, or they own some portion of it or unknown?

SPEAKER_31: Yeah, they own an unknown chunk of it right now, but despite no matter how big it gets for Netflix, they only get their $20 million payment, which they already got. They won't earn any additional, maybe they'll make a new deal for the sequel, who knows? But yeah, they kind of gave away what could have been a billion dollar property, it seems like, for $20 million, not a great deal. And, you know, I think throughout the streaming era, Sony's kind of seemed like the smart one, like NBC Universal, Paramount, Disney. They spent billions of dollars on these streaming platforms, and they're still lagging behind Netflix. Sony seemed like the smart one there. They don't have a streaming platform of their own. They just license all their content to the highest bidder. But here's a situation where, you know, they licensed the wrong thing, and they made kind of a bad deal.

SPEAKER_48: A self-inflicted wound.

SPEAKER_50: Yeah, they kind of lost out huge on this one.

Chamath Palihapitiya: This would be, this could wind up being the equivalent of what, Lon? If this goes seven movies and 10 seasons, 20 seasons, give me the equivalent.

SPEAKER_51: If it goes 20 seasons and seven movies, what would we compare this to in Animation Land?

SPEAKER_31: I mean, what you're, you know, what you're talking about going that huge would be, you know, something like a Transformers-level franchise. Something, I mean, even approaching like a Star Wars-level franchise. I don't know if it would go that big. But, yeah, I mean, certainly you could get several films, several shows out of this, like, you know, And this is anime. It's animated, right. So, I mean, something on the level of like a SpongeBob kind of franchise. And we know how crucial stuff like that has been for Paramount, where it's a TV show, it's a series of films, and the merch. I mean, that's the other thing is the merchandising, the shirts, the soundtrack albums. You know, they could put this thing on tour.

SPEAKER_17: Yes, and that's actually very interesting, Lon, because you said they were hosting sing-alongs in the theater. So, I thought, okay, people have to know the music. How much are they listening to it? I pulled up Spotify data, and then I ran an analysis. Streams. Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_31: It's crazy.

SPEAKER_57: On Spotify alone.

SPEAKER_31: Also, those sing-along screenings, they have, it's subtitled. So, like, that's how they do sing-along screenings. They put the lyrics on, so you can, it's like karaoke.

SPEAKER_51: So, you can sing along live with the movie in the theater. And this was done in English. This isn't a Korean, South Korean product. This is an American. That was dubbed. This is American from the beginning. It just happens to have K-pop in the name.

SPEAKER_31: Right, because K-pop is so huge. And there are, the singing voices of all the characters are provided by real K-pop stars.

SPEAKER_41: But, no, it is an American film with a lot of American, you'd recognize a lot of the voices.

SPEAKER_65: This thing's going to wind up being like Harry Potter because, or Lord of the Rings, because what's going to happen is they're going to do a live version of this.

SPEAKER_67: And they're going to do a play. They'd be fools not to. They'd be fools not to tour this.

SPEAKER_68: Can you imagine the play? A play on Broadway or traveling? Because they did a Harry Potter play at some point. I think it was quite successful.

SPEAKER_69: The Cursed Child, it's called. I read that. Yeah, it was okay. Look at you nerds.

SPEAKER_71: Look at you two nerd balls. You admit it? You read the book? I have not read the book.

SPEAKER_70: Oh my God, that's for children, Alex. What are you doing? I'm familiar. I'm concerned.

SPEAKER_17: So, I mean, Child Alex, back in the day, used to go with his friends to the Barnes & Noble

SPEAKER_76: or one of those bookstores. Borders. I'd been there to get the new Harry Potter book, Borders. Oh my God. Did you write pictures of that?

SPEAKER_78: Do you have a picture of yourself with hair online?

SPEAKER_15: Please find that. With a big mullet. Alex with a mullet. Go, producer.

SPEAKER_74: I feel like Jason's just discovering how big of an enormous dweeb I am, and I'm terrified it's going to let him down.

SPEAKER_84: We all understand the importance of a crisp, memorable, easy-to-spell domain name. One of those names you can say over the phone, and people know how to type it in without asking you the spelling. But let's get real. The good ones are either taken, or there's some poacher who's holding it and waiting for some huge payday, and they don't reply to you. Even if you want to pay for a premium domain, you don't want to use up all your runway on a domain name. That's just the truth for a startup. You want to put that valuable cash back into your startup's operations. So you should consider this, a .tech domain. You can get a clean, crisp, super memorable name for your website and company, and signal out loud to your customers and investors, we're a tech company that's instant branding for you. That's why over 500,000 founders have collectively raised over $5 billion in investment, building their companies on .tech. So skip the hassle, head to www.get.tech.twist, or go to your favorite registrar and grab your .tech domain today.

SPEAKER_31: That makes me feel so old. I was already working at a bookstore. Like I was selling kids' Harry Potter books at that time.

SPEAKER_84: So you may have sold it to Alex. Alex might have come in with his Alex mullet. I remember it. We're going to have a mullet. We're going to have a mullet day here. All three of us, we just put on a mullet wig and we just do the show. We don't mention the mullets. It's just a mullet show. I'm so down for gags. I could go natural.

SPEAKER_30: I'm not that far away. I could do a natural mullet.

SPEAKER_88: Yeah, I don't know about the mullet. You got more like the Stravos. Yeah, Stavros. Yeah, the bald up front party in the back. Yeah.

David Friedberg: I just realized, I didn't know Cometown all that much as a podcast.

SPEAKER_00: I know about the dirtbag laugh because I'm a big Red Scare fan and I know the Red Scare.

SPEAKER_86: And Chapo, Chapo Trap House was a big part of that too.

SPEAKER_00: It was all part of the Dime Square movement. But it turns out there were three co-hosts on the show, you and producer Nick from All-In, formerly a producer from here. There's three principals from there.

SPEAKER_04: Adam Friedland, right? Yes. Is it Friedland or Friedland? Friedland.

SPEAKER_41: Adam Friedland, Nick Mullen, and then Stavros.

SPEAKER_93: So Stavros went on to do the bear comedy. And he's a huge, huge hit.

SPEAKER_31: Yeah, he's hilarious.

SPEAKER_95: He did a movie this year called Let's Start a Cult that's really funny. It's on Hulu right now. That you can watch.

SPEAKER_96: And he was just at Cannes, I think, with a film.

SPEAKER_15: And so he's at this film with Jesse Plemons. Is that the character actor? Oh, is he in Begonia? Yeah. He's in Begonia. Oh, yes, you're right. He's in the New York. So I saw him trending on Begonia. So this guy's career has blown up. He's an indie star. He's a TV star. Huge podcaster, big comedian.

SPEAKER_99: Yeah, he's doing a lot of stuff.

SPEAKER_04: I like this guy. He's Greek. I need to meet my Greek brother at some point. I want to meet Stravos and hear his story. Let's book him for the show at some point. I'll try to get Stravos on. I'd love to have Stravos on. I would like to get Stravos on. Then there's Adam Friedland.

SPEAKER_00: He's got the Adam Friedland show, which is like a surreal, like he's a comedian. He's sardonic. And he's got an old style set where he just interviews people.

SPEAKER_102: And it's a little bit meant to be weird and awkward, like Between Two Ferns. Yes.

SPEAKER_31: I mean, I wouldn't. Between Two Ferns is like a full on parody. And I don't think it's it's not scripted like that. But it is like a, you know, it's like that new style where it's supposed to be very kind of loose. And it looks like a talk show, but it doesn't really follow most of the talk show rules.

SPEAKER_00: So I like this guy, Adam Friedland, because I watch his clips, I see them come up on TikTok, Instagram, et cetera. Yeah. He's witty.

SPEAKER_27: He's going very viral right now because of this Richie Torres interview that he did. That's why I pulled it up. The other day.

SPEAKER_51: Explain what that is. What happened with Richie Torres?

Chamath Palihapitiya: I watched a clip of this and he was very emotional. And the guy, Richie Torres, was a little, what's the word?

SPEAKER_31: I mean, I've got some choice words for it, but he comes off very cold. It's very, they're discussing Gaza. Representative Richie Torres, he is a Democratic congressman from New York. He actually represents the Bronx. Yankee Stadium is in his district, which they discuss on the Friedland show. So he's notable as one of the fiercest, staunchest, pro-Israeli members of Congress, where he is just, the United States has to back up our Israeli allies 100%. And Friedland is a progressive American Jew who lived in Israel for a while and is very opposed to Israel's war in Gaza and the treatment of the Palestinians. And so they're having this kind of debate, but it has gone viral because Friedland is really making this very emotional appeal. Like, how do you look at this footage of what's being done to these Palestinians and not feel for them and Torres is very much falling back on cable news style talking points and the same arguments you've heard 100,000 times. And it does, I think it comes off very mechanical. And that's what I noticed.

SPEAKER_00: He was very like mechanical, not heartfelt, not sincere, I guess would be the word. Exactly. And then Adam is breaking down. He says, listen, I grew up Jewish.

SPEAKER_04: They taught us about the Holocaust, obviously. And then I believe that we're perpetrating a genocide, or if anybody's perpetrating a genocide, I'm paraphrasing his words, like, I can't stand by after you, I don't want to say indoctrinated, but after you educated me on the Holocaust, it would probably be a better word maybe. Right. And felt very deeply connected to that horrific thing that happened to our culture, to my great

SPEAKER_00: grandparents.

Chamath Palihapitiya: And then I see this and it's causing massive dissonance in him. And then he's being responded to by a guy who is, like you said, doing...

SPEAKER_31: He's just, yeah, jumping like, oh, like, but that's Hamas and Hamas started it and all this stuff that I don't know about, like, we don't have to get into the arguments themselves, but just all of the things you'd expect to hear on, you know, cable news, to people like...

SPEAKER_24: But it goes to show how popular Adam's show is, that we've all seen these clips bounce on our social media, a very effective broadcaster.

SPEAKER_112: Yeah, well, and I think... It's an incredible broadcaster, yeah.

SPEAKER_31: And I think it also shows why Democrats are struggling so much with the podcast revolution and, like, they're just kind of unable to, whereas a lot of Republicans have the ability to go on these shows, like J.D. Vance on Theo Vaughn, and look, I'm not a J.D. Vance fan, but he feels very natural on that, in that show. He can just pick off the politician hat and chat with Theo Vaughn like two guys chatting. And repeatedly, when we see Democrats get on these kinds of shows in these same kinds of environments, they don't seem to have that ability to do that. And Friedland is practically begging Torres to just, like, take off the... Show some humanity.

SPEAKER_115: Just stop talking like a politician and let's talk like humans.

SPEAKER_23: Yeah, I think the problem is that these positions get codified on sides, to paraphrase what you just said, Lon. And so people end up just wanting to represent a particular, as we say, party line. Now, Richard Torres is not someone that I'm hyper familiar with because I'm not from the East Coast originally. I know that the California reps a lot better. But I do think that especially on issues like Israel and Gaza, people have formed opinions so strong that there's not a lot of debate to be had in some ways. Like when I read a lot of tweets from people on the progressive left, the Jewish progressive

SPEAKER_17: left, you know, the right, the Jewish right. And there doesn't seem to be any actual discourse whatsoever.

SPEAKER_23: I don't see anyone ever going, that's an interesting perspective. I'll think about that. It's just shouting.

SPEAKER_15: And you're not allowed to change your position or say, I don't know, or I'm unsure. Let me tell you my position. I'm unsure what's going on over there. I feel like I can't get precise news, but I can tell you that hundreds of thousands of people starving and being not in their homes is a tragedy. Exactly. I think that's all.

SPEAKER_04: I don't have to pick size. If it was either side, we're starving. Starving equals bad.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Now, if I say that, does that mean I'm anti-Israeli? And people are trying to make me choose a side in a multi-thousand year conflict in which

SPEAKER_00: it's filled with suffering. Am I supposed to make, how do you pick a side on what happened in October 7th and what

SPEAKER_84: we see in the last 30 days in Gaza? And I think. I can't pick a side on either one of those. They're both horrible.

SPEAKER_31: Yeah. And I think a lot of the reaction to this has been like, well, what is Torres supposed to do? Switch sides because he's on this podcast? And like, no, I don't think that, I don't think he would have needed to switch sides in order to turn this appearance around. I think what people were looking for is exactly what you just said. It's regardless of where you come down on what should be done, what are the next steps? We have to take a moment and acknowledge that these images we're seeing from Gaza are horrific and that the treatment of those people and leaving these people to die in refugee camps and blowing up their refugee camps and killing journalists. Listen, like, we all can agree just that that is not something that should be done. That is bad. That's horrible. We don't want to see that. What can we do to make that stop? Beyond that, whatever you think your proposal is for how should America engage? I don't even think the conversation ever got to that level because they couldn't agree. Torres was unwilling to even acknowledge, like, what we're seeing from Gaza is horrific and no one should be subjected to treatment like that.

SPEAKER_124: We're all familiar with AWS, Amazon Web Services. That's the cloud platform that powers so many of your favorite brands. But do you know about AWS Activate? That's their program for startups where they provide up to $100,000 in AWS credits for all startups. Whether you're backed by an investor or you're bootstrapping, money is time to keep innovating, time to delight customers, and time for you to keep gaining traction. You need runway, and AWS's Activate is going to help you with that runway. We hear this story from so many of our founding university companies. They're finding product market fit, the words getting out about their product, just a little boost, finding some savings here or there to get a little extra time can be the difference between getting traction and bringing in revenue or, hey, let's call it what it is, running out of money, okay, and shutting down. AWS knows this. That's why they've created the ultimate toolkit for early stage startups looking to boost growth. With AWS Activate, you're going to get up to $100,000 in AWS credits, hands-on support and training, plus exclusive discounts with some of our favorite companies and tools. So start getting the support you need at every stage of your startup journey. To learn more, visit aws.amazon.com slash startups slash credits. That's right, aws.amazon.com slash startups slash credits.

SPEAKER_00: It's great that we have platforms that exist now, specifically YouTube, podcasting, Substacks, Beehive, Emails, X, you know, pick your platform where new voices can join the discussion and just participate in it. And people get all bent out of shape about a venture capitalist, a CEO, a comedian joining the discussion. You don't have to be bent out of shape for it. You can just put that into context. If Adam Friedland's a comedian, but his first person experience, his lived experience, to use a term, that's valid. But you can put it in context. If Joe Rogan has a discussion or Theo Vaughn and you think Theo Vaughn is like, you know, maybe not the most astute person when it comes to geopolitics, or I'm not, or Saks is not, or whoever's not. Okay, you can have that feeling and you can just put it in context. He's a comedian who feels sad when he sees images of people suffering. That's a valid thing. It doesn't have to be the totality of the reality that's occurring there. It's a comedian's opinion. So, okay, now I have a comedian's opinion. Now I have a Jewish podcaster in New York's, you know, liberal suffering and, you know,

SPEAKER_04: cognitive dissonance. I have Lon's, I have Alex, you have mine. You can just put all this together and make it into a framework for you to make a better decision yourself.

SPEAKER_00: Thank God we have more voices coming to the table, not just captured news programs where they're reading talking points that have been assigned to them.

SPEAKER_04: They give these guys talking points on Sunday, both sides. And then they have to repeat specific words and phrases.

SPEAKER_130: Yeah.

SPEAKER_19: And that is the death knell of this in an age of unfiltered, honest discourse. Right.

SPEAKER_132: Charlemagne, the God, the Breakfast Club host this week, he labeled Hakeem Jeffries, another Democratic rep who's very pro-Israel, Aipak Shakur.

SPEAKER_31: And I think that's what, that's what this all is highlighting is like, these guys have these lobbying groups and these special interest groups that are dictating policy, telling them exactly what to say. And when you get on, you know, when you go on and do an MSNBC hit, that might work out fine. But when you go on Adam Friedland's podcast, he's going to call you out.

SPEAKER_15: Had he not watched? What's the theory here? He didn't watch it. I think sometimes people don't watch the podcasts that are going on.

SPEAKER_41: Yeah. If you watch the clip, if you watch the clip all the way to the end, one of the last things Friedland says to Torres at the end of the interview is, I know your people told you not to come on the show and like, maybe they were right.

SPEAKER_31: So clearly Torres was not as familiar with that show as he should have been. And he had people who in his corner were like.

SPEAKER_137: I'd like to see him come back and take a second shot at it as like a human, not a robot. Alex, you thought you were trying to interject.

SPEAKER_17: Oh, it was just, it's just my favorite Theo Vaughn clip is when he was talking to, I believe president Trump and he said, uh, cocaine will turn you into a damn lighthouse homie. And that is a statement that is so hilarious by itself in the context of speaking to the president and now contrast that with how we approach presidential debates. Now I'm not saying Theo Vaughn should moderate the next presidential debate, but think about

SPEAKER_138: the difference in tenor of questions and what you might be able to learn from somebody by having them in a more relaxed conversation versus essentially trying to recreate the white house press room in every single interview.

SPEAKER_115: I want to just go back and circle back around to the K-pop demon hunters.

SPEAKER_00: I know that's a little bit of a right turn. Sure, let's do it. Let's talk K-pop demon hunters. I've always felt I would have been a great studio head. And I feel like that's still a possibility for Milan because I feel like studio heads is such a mercurial, insane, deranged position in the world that you get to green light stuff and you have like an undue amount of influence over that. And then you have these hits and bombs. I just love it. I read the Barry Diller biography. The kid stays in the picture. I love that job. And I think there's a huge opportunity here around IP. And I've talked to you about it, Lon, over the years based on like Toho Studios and our mutual love of Kurosawa and how they did things. I would really like to fund a startup, I would incubate it, of trying to create the next K-pop demon hunters, the next squid game, but use the new mediums to do it. There's a new short form, Lon, I don't know what it's called, but it's very popular in China where you watch like a 90 second or a three minute vertical video. Microdrama. Microdrama. Thank you. Oh, right. I've heard about this.

SPEAKER_04: Um, about this and it's, it's hard, but I think you could create a little mini studio

SPEAKER_00: that doesn't try to make money in the short term.

SPEAKER_15: They just try to build characters and IP. Well, do you know about Naver? N-A-V-E-R. Of course. Naver is like basically the Yahoo of Korea. I met with the founders 15 years ago when I started Mahalo.

SPEAKER_31: So they have a, uh, like they call them webtoons. They're basically online comics. What we would think of as online comics, uh, that are a huge source of IP for Korea and Japan. Like they're constantly making animes or TV adaptations or movie adaptations of stories that got popular on Naver as a webtoon and then got turned into this next thing. Like a lot of the Netflix anime originals or new anime shows you'll see out of Japan started life or, or like even Korean TV shows, a lot of them started life as these, you know, basically manga or comics, but they were not published on paper ever, just exclusively from the internet.

SPEAKER_17: Uh, before we can jump back into this, Jason, there's a company doing this. It's called MicroCo. And, uh, this is an article from earlier this month. They want to take the micro drama phrase, infuse it with AI and avoid somehow the Quibi comparison, which is the obvious thing. If you don't recall folks, Quibi was a short lived short form video project, right?

SPEAKER_149: Quibi, not Quibi.

SPEAKER_00: It was a terrible name, but it was Katzenberg. Katzenberg comes up as a young, uh, assistant in the Barry Diller. He was, I think Barry Diller's assistant for a little bit, or one of the heads of Paramount Pictures or Gulf Western. And, uh, he's a friend of mine. I play cards with him sometimes. And we, we chat once in a while, uh, Katzenberg's like one of my favorite people. And he had a really good idea there. I think the problem was too much money going too big. Remember they had a $2 billion valuation before they started? Yes. You can't have a $2 billion valuation. You got to have a $50 million valuation. You have to raise 10 million. You have to go slow. You have to learn and you have to make mistakes. And the thing that I got out of the Barry Diller biography was that he just liked to

SPEAKER_04: fail fast and learn by doing. And that's how he did his entire career. Barry Diller created the movie of the week. Lon, you can explain to people what this kind of cultural significance was, but he, when he took over CBS, decided to do the movie of the week.

SPEAKER_31: It was ABC, wasn't it? I think it was ABC. It was ABC. Yeah. The ABC movie of the week. I think so. Right?

SPEAKER_154: I think it was like third place. Cause that was like Duel.

SPEAKER_31: And he started doing these. Duel is the most, Steven Spielberg got his start doing these. Duel, that first Spielberg film was an ABC movie of the week, famously.

SPEAKER_00: And it turned out that the movies of the week, they had had all the different movie studios pitch them. And he said, you know what? We're just going to do it ourselves. We're not going to give the creatives the ability to like, just go off for two years and make something. We're going to actually have a process here where they pitch, we iterate, we read the scripts and they had like, like tighter controls on it. And they made so many amazing films. Some of them had like six or seven, uh, sequels to them.

SPEAKER_155: And it was the number one show.

SPEAKER_31: The other interesting thing I was going to say, IP wise was they would do, they would make a lot of pilots as movies of the week. And then the popular ones would get TV shows. So like Starsky and Hutch, $6 million man, Kung Fu. Those all started as ABC movies of the week that then took on a life of their own as shows.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Yeah, this was like a crazy idea.

SPEAKER_04: So there's always, even though the media space feels like it is the toughest business in the world, and it is in some ways, there are opportunities here to take the new mediums, whether it's AI, generative AI specifically, TikTok, you know, shorts, vertical video or panels on Instagram. And you could figure this out. So if somebody out there is like, um, got a lot of energy for this, I would love to hear

SPEAKER_157: some pitches on it, Jason at Calacanis.com for life. All right. Thank you, uh, editorial hair director, Lon. My pleasure. I think that's the proper way to say it, air director. Yeah, I'll take that. Sure. Yeah, sure. Air director. Okay. Uh, thank you. Yeah, yeah. All right. We'll drop him off and continue going through the docket because I'm sure there's a lot

SPEAKER_163: of tech news that we haven't talked about since Wednesday. Yes.

SPEAKER_17: Very, very much so. Although it's not going to be as fun, everybody, as K-pop demon hunters. We're now going to go eat our vegetables. Uh, but Jason, there's quite a lot going on.

SPEAKER_171: There's your dad joke, folks. Dad joke number two. Doom. I need my stinger.

SPEAKER_170: Dang it. I'm trying so hard to not. I love it.

SPEAKER_171: Don't keep doing them. I want to have like a stinger that like everybody groans and then there's a layer of

SPEAKER_00: cricket. Somebody in the audience make like a great stinger for us. Dad jokes from Alex, I'll pay you like 500 bucks to make me, whoever makes the best stinger for this, we'll, we'll pay you 500 bucks. I'll pay a ballot to you personally.

SPEAKER_173: If you want to run a successful company or maintain a profitable portfolio, like I'm trying

SPEAKER_84: to do, you need reliable data. And without the most accurate and up-to-date information, you're flying blind. That's why you and your company need a partner like AlphaSense. They're the world's number one, most trusted AI platform for market intelligence. That means they can help you and your team track the latest economic trends before your competitors even know they exist.

SPEAKER_04: Hey, listen, hear a twist? We eat our own dog food. We only pick advertisers and partners here on the show that we love their products. AlphaSense has a massive searchable database of public companies, and that lets us quickly dig up the most relevant facts and context, and their equity funding screener includes private companies, not just the public ones. They save us time and they make us super human. So start your AI search and market intelligence journey today and get deeper insights to power your business. We're even going to start you off with a free trial. How great is that? Alpha-Sense.com slash twist to get started. Make sure you use that URL so they know we sent you and you can get this great deal. But let's get started here.

SPEAKER_00: I know XAI has a coding model and that people are kind of losing their mind over it.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Yeah?

SPEAKER_17: Yeah, it's fantastic. So everyone knows XAI is Elon Musk's foundation AI model company competing with Anthropic and OpenAI. And we talked about them on the show when they launched the Grok 4 family of models, which as we said at the time were quite good. They ranked very high. People quite like them. Now, they're also new. It's called Grok Code Fast 1 with dashes in between. This was, quote, built from scratch, starting with a brand new model architecture. And they built it alongside some partners, Jason. So as they were building it, they were talking to Cursor and GitHub Copilot and Windsurf and others to get feedback to make it better. Now, what's really interesting here, because we have other models in the market that are pretty good at coding from Anthropic in particular, this one is fast and cheap. For use, it's only 20 cents per million input tokens and only $1.50 per million output tokens. And for reference, Jason, that's cheaper than GPT-5 mini. And it has a really, really quick token throughput. So it's just quite impressive.

SPEAKER_68: And here you go. Here's the model performance on the XAI site.

SPEAKER_00: As you can see here, you have the output price for 1 million tokens and tokens per second. Tokens are, you can think of them as words or chunks of knowledge. And Grok Code Fast 1 is the cheapest and the highest tokens per second. And then if you go look at, you know, Grok 4 and Gemini, GPT-5, Claude Sonnet, Sonic, very expensive. One of the great things about what we're seeing in a competition like this is how, um, what's the economic term deflationary, I guess this technology can be. If you want to win, you can change the world by making something that was previously extremely expensive, extremely affordable.

Chamath Palihapitiya: And you see this in everything from tickets for airplanes, right? That's like an attack vector. We're going to make flights cheaper. Uh, you can see it with food, cloud kitchens, uh, delivery of stuff. You can see it, um, uh, in hotels with Airbnb and, and hospitality, right?

SPEAKER_04: And so here we're seeing it, uh, as the, I guess, way for XAI to catch up when you're behind, when you have a couple of players ahead of you, what are strategies for startups? You know, one of them is to make something free or to make it dirt cheap that gets people's attention. And then there's a certain group of people, usually the Vanguard, the early adopters who will notice something like that. So you can make it better. That's always good. Another attack vector is to make it cheaper and another attack vector is faster. So if you want to beat people, better, faster, cheaper are the three things you're looking at. Uh, and if you were to look at Elon's success at SpaceX, cheaper and better, right?

SPEAKER_157: Uh, and then you look at, uh, his electric cars, they were faster, but more expensive and

SPEAKER_04: better. Actually, it wasn't even better. They were just faster when the booster came out. They were very fast.

SPEAKER_183: Yeah.

SPEAKER_04: Then when the model S came out, it was faster and better.

SPEAKER_00: And then when the model three came out, it was faster, better, cheaper.

SPEAKER_184: All three.

SPEAKER_00: All three.

Chamath Palihapitiya: And then you look at BYD being, you know, uh, what is it? Be your dreams. Be your dreams.

SPEAKER_185: Build your dreams.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Build your dreams. I think it's build your dreams. Yeah.

SPEAKER_00: Um, and so you look at BYD, they're cheaper, not faster. They're certainly not better, but they're going to have to cheaper. And then the Chinese government is subsidizing them and they are ripping through some markets,

Chamath Palihapitiya: you know, and it's quite unfair, um, when the government price dumps like that. But hey, that's the game on the field right now. So it is what it is.

SPEAKER_17: It's the game on the field right now. Uh, Jason, I want to illustrate exactly what you're saying in the form of a chart. One thing that I track a lot is how AI models rank and then how much they get used. And one place that we look at that usage data is on open router. It's a service that lets people kind of pick and choose models for their inference needs. And I don't bring it up too much because it is a partial data set. I'm trying to avoid those, but sometimes something moves so quickly that I think it is worth our time to look at.

SPEAKER_16: Yeah, it could be directionally correct. It might not be the perfect data, but it could be directionally correct. Yeah, hit us with it.

SPEAKER_17: Especially when the direction is this clear. So what I'm showing on the screen for folks listening to the audio is the combined tokens process on open router, which is a venture backed startup for all of XAI's models. And Jason, as you can see here, the teal bars are when Grok 4 came out and their usage did go up by maybe 30, 40%. Then they started letting people use Grok code fast one and it tripled to up to 80 billion tokens. I think that's a day. So it's been a dramatic increase in XAI's, I would say in market share. And I think that's critical because they've been building good models, but I don't think they've been commercializing them or getting revenue out of them as effectively as I might

SPEAKER_08: have expected, but here they have a demonstrable straight up hit.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Amazing. And Microsoft, which has a very deep relationship with open AI, but let's call it perhaps tenuous

SPEAKER_00: at times conflicted because they own 49% of the company until it hits some amount of revenue, this whole convoluted deal structure, um, that, you know, is a headwind for open

SPEAKER_04: AI, all this convoluted nonprofit to for-profit, the Microsoft relationship, the, the, the nuance

SPEAKER_00: of that relationship, which has them making back a certain amount of money and then it becomes public demand. It's just all very weird, but it's a real testament to how great their product is. Um, and how the utilization of it and their product cadence, how often they release new stuff that despite all of the hair on those deals and the corporate structure, they're able to keep this thing growing and the revenue growing. If you have revenue growing, it can make up for a lot of mistakes, but you shouldn't make these kinds of organizational mistakes.

Chamath Palihapitiya: You should avoid those. That's why you got to have good attorneys, good board of directors, et cetera, which they did not. But Microsoft, I'm guessing has seen enough to know that that relationship is not reliable

SPEAKER_08: and they're doing what exactly, Alex?

SPEAKER_17: So Microsoft's AI division named Microsoft AI or MAI, if you will, has put out two homegrown AI models this week. Now, Microsoft has released some models in the past, but these are more flagship. These are larger, more general use. And so the one that we need to talk about is called, uh, MA1 preview. It's a mixture of experts model trained on 15,000 H 100s. So they put a lot of GPU power behind this and it is a model built for kind of a purpose inside of the Microsoft domain. So it's for following instructions and providing helpful responses to everyday queries. Think about things like office copilot. Jason is my guess. What's interesting to me is that they immediately charted with this one. So I was over on LM arena, which runs a lot of side-by-side tests to track out which models are best across which metrics. And this one shot up to the 13th best model in the world, which I think for a preview from

SPEAKER_138: Microsoft's AI division for their first model of this sort is quite good, but it's still very, very far behind what open AI has cooked up. Because right now, if you look at the top of the charts, it's Anthropic and it's Google

SPEAKER_17: and it's open AI. And then Microsoft's far down below. But this de-risks them, Jason, because if they have their own model, they don't have to pay anyone else's margins. So in time, I can see Microsoft moving away from open AI's models for stuff inside of the Microsoft world and still offering them, of course, on Azure and so forth. But this strikes me as Microsoft saying, we don't only have open AI in our pocket. We do have our own smart nerds who are cooking up their own models.

SPEAKER_195: Yeah, that's an important hedge. And they had hired, was it Ilya that they hired?

Chamath Palihapitiya: That was Mustafa, I believe. Oh, Mustafa, right. Sorry.

SPEAKER_00: Um, Mustafa got hired by Microsoft to become the CEO of Microsoft AI. So I'm going to assume that this is under his, uh, management. What's interesting about this is we're now starting to see a couple of different cohorts. You got the non-Mag 7, I'll call native, uh, models, open AI, XAI, Anthropic.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Then you got the Mac 7, in some cases, pursuing models. Uh, I understand Amazon has a model now. Apple was doing something in vision and images. This is Microsoft. Obviously we know Gemini doing very well at Alphabet. And then Meta has, um, Lama. Lama, yeah. And then you got the Chinese companies, uh, coming in with Deep Seek and Moonshot, Baidu. And, um, I guess Mistro in Europe would be, I would put them in that first group. So you kind of have these three groups, the Mac 7, the non-Mag 7, and then the Chinese ones. Uh, I think it's starting to come down to who has the wherewithal and the deepest pockets

SPEAKER_00: to stay in this game. This is not an, this is not a cheap game.

Chamath Palihapitiya: This is like being in like the F1 or in, uh, like the, what were those sailing races that Oracle would always win?

SPEAKER_00: America's Cup. America's Cup. Like it's expensive to feel the team, I guess, and also like professional soccer too, right?

SPEAKER_200: Like, uh, it's not cheap to have Arsenal or Newcastle or whatever the teams are there.

SPEAKER_201: I'm glad you started with the best team in the Premier League. Newcastle.

SPEAKER_17: Oh, Arsenal.

SPEAKER_204: Okay.

SPEAKER_17: Uh, just to point it in perspective though, Jason. So the F1 racing world is famously expensive. They did put a cost cap in. So now it's about 140, 150 million a year. Uh, that would get you what? Seven GPUs and a cooling rack.

SPEAKER_205: I mean, it's funny how, how much more expensive this stuff is.

SPEAKER_207: Yeah.

SPEAKER_04: It's, it's, um, and then I guess the question is we're now in a game of chicken with these companies who can keep building data centers, keep raising money, and then race towards the cliff, hoping that the cliff turns into a bridge with the bridge being revenue and customers willing to take out their wallets and give 20 to $200 a month, you know, $250 a year to

Chamath Palihapitiya: $2,000 a year to use these platforms.

SPEAKER_04: And there probably don't need to be 20 of them. It's probably going to whittle down there.

Chamath Palihapitiya: It would be great if there were a dozen available, but it will eventually be six. So we're going to see, six seems like a good number. Yeah.

SPEAKER_211: I think six, you know, three from the U S two from China, maybe one from MENA Europe area,

SPEAKER_212: you know, somewhere that something like that. I can see that.

SPEAKER_68: Okay. Uh, wow. Uh, I guess maybe we should talk.

Chamath Palihapitiya: I know you love revenue and I saw my friend Brad Gerstner talking about, um, Nvidia and there

SPEAKER_68: is a, you know, pursuant to what we just discussed in this game of chicken, who's willing to build the most data centers and fill them with, uh, Nvidia gear.

SPEAKER_216: My Lord, six customers are now 85% of Nvidia's revenue in the last quarter. Break it down for us. Yeah.

SPEAKER_138: All right. Uh, Nvidia is a company that if you are a gamer, you have known for a long time because they make graphics cards for computers.

SPEAKER_17: It turns out those little computers are great in mass scale to handle parallel calculations. And so as the AI boom has expanded, Jason, people that run AI compute are buying mountains of GPUs. Now there's only so many companies out there that are building what we call hyper-scaled compute, which is your Microsoft Azure is your Google clouds, your Amazon, AWS, et cetera. What this means is the number of companies that are really buying enormous sums of GPUs from Nvidia, which is the leading GPU company in the world. Isn't that many. There's only like, as you said, you know, maybe six future AI companies. There's only probably five or six hyperscalers in the world today. So unsurprisingly, they buy a lot of stuff from Nvidia. And unsurprisingly, that yields a really funny customer revenue count in startups, Jason. If you saw a company come in that had one customer that was 80% of the revenue, big red flag, you don't want that level of customer concentration. So people are a little worried in Nvidia's case. So how big is their number one customer? 23% of revenue in their last quarter.

Chamath Palihapitiya: And that's probably XAI or open AI, I think the biggest because Colossus was the biggest. So it's gotta be XAI is number one.

SPEAKER_223: I mean, it's gotta be top free.

SPEAKER_200: It's gotta be one in two are open AI and XAI. You gotta think. And then after that.

SPEAKER_138: Meta, which is spending tens of billions as well, and doesn't have its own in-house chip division the same way that Alphabet does, for example, with their GPUs or the training in chips over at Amazon's AWS group.

SPEAKER_17: So basically there's one customer, 23%, another one.

SPEAKER_00: Maybe it's Microsoft because they have Azure and Azure powers open AI. Actually, that's probably what's going on here is that open AI is buying them, but they also have a deal where they get compute from Microsoft. That was part of that original Harry deal we were just talking about.

SPEAKER_216: So maybe it's Microsoft because they represent two of the language models or two of the big players.

SPEAKER_23: Yeah, absolutely. But 23, 16, 14, 11, 11, 10.

SPEAKER_17: That's, you know, most of NVIDIA's revenue from just a handful of companies. And this is why people are so worried about NVIDIA's earnings, Jason. Like if you think about, you know, when they dropped, everyone was really holding on tight because if they miss, it implied that the hyperskillers weren't spending, it implied the AI demand was slowing, it implied that et cetera, et cetera.

SPEAKER_138: So it was kind of a linchpin earnings report.

Chamath Palihapitiya: You know, this could be a stop and start kind of a situation where it takes time to digest the models. It takes time to finish the products and get them to market. And then the software and the developers become more efficient at utilizing the infrastructure. So there's a confluence of factors here that are going to trend towards growth for NVIDIA. But what if somebody like Alphabet says, hey, we're going to be, we have our own silicon, Amazon's working on their own silicon. I think we have enough H100s and whatever, you know, and we're going to just try to build on our own. And the long tail of demand here is also significant. There are startups who are using Azure, Google Cloud, et cetera, for their GPUs. So those are long-term going to keep buying, you would think.

SPEAKER_17: Absolutely. Also, OpenAI's Sarah Fryer, I think we mentioned this on the show a week or two ago. She did an interview with CNBC.

SPEAKER_138: The CFO, thank you, Jason. And she said that they're still constantly under compute. And so at least for today, there remains a shortage of free GPUs to use at scale. But we are seeing some other changes as well. So a story that we're not going to focus on today, but I'll just mention it, Alibaba is mentioning over in China that they're working on their own chips that's going to help out with the intra-China GPU shortage. So everyone wants NVIDIA's market cap. They are the number one most valuable company in the world. You're not worth $4 trillion plus without having everybody taking shots at you. But, you know, to quote The Wire, if you come at the king, you best not miss. And thus far, no one's really managed to slow down Jensen and his team.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Uh, yeah. And we have to get our hands on this Claude browser. We had a great experience with the Comet browser.

SPEAKER_57: Mm-hmm.

Chamath Palihapitiya: It's become-

SPEAKER_138: The browser, though, Jason, is a way to let Claude run Chrome for you versus a distinct whole cloth browser, just so people are-

Chamath Palihapitiya: Everybody's used- Everybody basically uses Chromium, I believe is the name of the open source project, or Mozilla, which is the Firefox project. Both of those are open source projects. You would never write a browser- A modern browser from scratch. You would use those basic, um, architectures and then have those, uh, you would wrap them, basically. And, uh, I use the Brave browser and Comet now. Brave I use because of the protections and getting rid of ads and privacy. Yeah. And, uh, it's fast. Uh, I think it's also fast because it's not letting people cookie you and all that's cruft slows you down. Yeah. In terms of web speed.

SPEAKER_240: Um, but-

SPEAKER_239: But tell me more about Comet.

SPEAKER_240: I'm curious. You've been using it now for a couple of weeks, I think. A month. A month, yeah.

SPEAKER_242: Definitely a month, yeah.

SPEAKER_138: An AI browser, the browser of the future, Jason, has it changed your productivity? Your workflows? How you approach the internet?

Chamath Palihapitiya: Yeah, it has. Um, you know, Perplexi's got a pretty good search product. Um, and the Google one is kind of two different products. They haven't moved to the AI native search on Google. You can use it. But, uh, Perplexi does a nice job with, like, a comprehensive search, which was pioneered by Mahalo, my company when humans were doing it, and, uh, Naver and Daum in Korea, both of those Korean companies. Um, and so they do a good job at that comprehensive search. Um, not for everything, but pretty solid. And they're taking a Yahoo-like approach now, where they have shopping and finance, I think. And so Yahoo Finance, for me, isn't as good as Perplexity's finance product. So when I'm checking stocks, I find myself using Perplexity's stock checker instead of Yahoo Finance and Google now. Um, because it does an interesting thing. It goes and searches and summarizes the news with AI, as opposed to just natively listing the stories. And so they're kind of intercepting my clicks from going to MarketWatch or to Fortune or whoever's covering what's going on at Robinhood or Uber or Korean Defense or whatever I'm in at the moment. So I, I do find that a little, what's that?

SPEAKER_06: It's so bad for Yahoo.

SPEAKER_247: Yeah.

Chamath Palihapitiya: I mean, Jim Lenzone's got to decide if they are going to super invest in AI to summarize their partner's stories. But I think they have a prisoner's dilemma there because I think they make money by sending traffic to their partners. I think their partners pay for placement or, because you see some of them say sponsored on them and their news stories.

SPEAKER_248: Yeah.

Chamath Palihapitiya: So if you were to summarize them, well, then you don't get the advertising there. All these AI companies don't have advertising products. So their products are kind of like Uber or Lyft in the early days where they're being subsidized by venture capital.

SPEAKER_04: Yeah. And if you could get a summary of all the stories without any advertising or cruft in it, and then Yahoo needs to have the cruft in the advertising, man, that's a huge advantage for making a better product than Google's, which is filled with ads as well. But I do like using it for multi-step processes.

Chamath Palihapitiya: So I will pull up the assistant on a page and I'll say, hey, summarize the themes here in this story, or please go find these individuals, LinkedIn's for me and go follow them on LinkedIn. And it doesn't quite work perfectly yet. And it's all based on Claude, by the way. I use Claude as my, I use Comet as the browser, but I use Claude as the language model. So very interesting that the browser, you can kind of like, you can pick a search engine, DuckDuckGo or Google or Yahoo, whatever.

SPEAKER_250: You can actually pick what language model you use. And I don't think I can use a non-AI browser ever again.

SPEAKER_17: Ah, see, that's interesting. So it has changed your behavior patterns for life, which means that we actually have turned a new page in browser technology.

SPEAKER_243: I think so. Yeah. When you have the assistant there at the side, when you have the one-click summary of the

Chamath Palihapitiya: page, when you can fire off like a, I'll call it a light agent to do something. Sure. Okay. It works relatively well. Not good enough yet. But if I want to, like when I was having my Mexico City trip I took, I was like, go to these websites, figure out the consensus of all the best restaurants, you know, near this hotel, in this neighborhood, which was Roma, where I stayed. Um, and then put it in a table and then give me the Yelp link, the Instagram link, you know, and the trip advisor link or whatever. And, um, and the Google local link. And it kind of did a decent job at that almost 60% of what my Athena assistant would do.

SPEAKER_00: So I had my Athena assistants do it. I did it. Now I've trained my Athena assistants to use Comet to do this.

Chamath Palihapitiya: So I'm using a combination of Athena assistants and the emerging technology. And that's seems to be a winning combination for me for getting more done faster. And if you want to know what it's like to have an Athena assistant, I have two of them. They work seven days a week. They have a split schedule. Some days they overlap by half an hour and I have them in a, I message group. I have them in a Slack and I was like, give me the restaurants, rank them by Michelin stars, rank them by the reviews or whatever. They do all that little bit of AI, a little bit of their manual stuff. And then I gave them my open table account and I said, get me two restaurants per night

SPEAKER_04: based on this list, one reservation at five 30, one reservation at seven 30.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Then I said, okay, I will tell you which reservation I'm going to use around four o'clock. So the restaurant can give it up. They don't mind you doing that. Um, and the ones that are hoity toity, sometimes we'll give you like a $10 per person cancellation fee, which is if that happens to me, I'm happy to give a restaurant tour because my dad was one. And I know it's a hard business. I'm happy to give them the 20 bucks if I don't cancel within an hour or two, whatever their policy is. And, um, man, that makes your life real simple.

SPEAKER_259: And it really works well.

SPEAKER_138: Also, you're making me incredibly hungry because I'm a huge fan of Mexican food, uh, but this brings

SPEAKER_17: up a really important poly market, Jason, people are trying to figure out what's going to happen with open AI launching its own browser. We've been reporting that this is going to come now. This is a relatively small market and I wouldn't normally bring up a smaller one, but there's something very interesting that happens. If you click a button, watch this. If you change the timeframe here on this poly market, this one is open AI browser by September 30th. It's not that high of a chance about a third. If you click on change the date to October 31st, suddenly people think there's a two thirds chance. So it does appear that some people are really wagering that this open AI browser is going to come either in the first month of Q4 or around there. So here's hoping they're right, because if comment is good, then I would love to see more browsers showing the same thing competing.

SPEAKER_68: Yeah. Shout out to our friends at poly market, because one of the great things here, and I don't

SPEAKER_264: know what the rules are on this, but if you have inside information, are you like, if you

SPEAKER_84: worked at open AI or you were, let's say you're a recruiter and I'm a recruiter and open AI

SPEAKER_00: had me recruit 10 people to work on a browser six months ago. And then they said, we don't need any more. There's no more open recs for that. I might be able to discern. Okay. And if those people are still working there and I check their socials now, is that proprietary, is that inside information? It's not like, I wonder how that works for, I mean, I know how it works in sports leagues.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Like you're not allowed to like miss your free throws to, you know, get the under, but how

SPEAKER_269: would that work on a poly market or any prediction market?

SPEAKER_252: So insider trading laws apply to securities.

SPEAKER_17: And I, as far as I understand it, we're trying to narrowly define securities to leave crypto alone. So I'm going to presume that poly market doesn't land there. There are some states that have insider betting laws, but that's not as broad across the nation. And when we're talking about what poly market does, it's, is it technically betting?

SPEAKER_07: Is it wagering? Or is it investing in a hedging?

SPEAKER_272: Investing in an outcome is a way to say it.

SPEAKER_17: Here's a funny thing. Here's a funny thing. Some experts argue that allowing insiders to trade may increase market accuracy. Yes. Though this conflicts with fairness. Yes, it does. And yes, it would.

SPEAKER_00: So they don't. Yeah. I think that's a feature here. I want the insiders doing this because it means the data will be more accurate. So like when I was saying Biden is going to be hot swapped, and I made that incredible

SPEAKER_04: call as Nostracanis on all in and here, you know, it turned out I had heard from people like, you know, yeah, I wouldn't say, as I said, call them insiders, but in and around the political arena that they felt that was going to happen. And I felt it certainly was going to happen because I thought it gave them a free second chance at winning the election. Right. If you knew you were going to lose and you got this free second chance, why wouldn't you take it? Exactly. Right. And as I explained, like, why would you do a June debate with Biden if the debates normally start in September? That when I heard that they had done that, like, and I guess in May they announced it or April, I was like, wait a second. And I'm not an insider, but I had an insight, which is, oh, the Democratic Party is setting up and stress testing Biden's ability to win this race so they have enough time to hot swap. And that's actually how I made my decision.

SPEAKER_17: Good news. Producer Claude just got back to us and traditional insider trading laws don't apply to prediction

SPEAKER_138: markets because they fall under the CTFC's jurisdiction. And the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, I don't think, deals as much with insider regulation versus just keeping tabs on the commodity market.

SPEAKER_17: So it should be okay. Actually, let me rephrase that. It may be okay. This show is not legal advice.

SPEAKER_76: And if you do get in trouble, you're not allowed to call us. Yes. We're just fans of wagering and predictions and figuring out what's going to happen next.

Chamath Palihapitiya: That's all we are. I do think if you are the principal in this, like if you were Sam Altman and you get to

SPEAKER_279: pick when you launch, you're not allowed to participate based on the terms of service at Polymarket.

SPEAKER_138: That would be fair. Also, by the way, producer Claude is brought to us by our dear friends over at Anthropic. And we talk about them all the time on the show, but we talk about them most of the time in a non-sponsored format.

SPEAKER_68: Yes. They're a partner on the program as is Polymarket. Yeah. Yeah.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Lots of friends. So we are so lucky to have the top brands partnering to bring this amazing episode. It's not cheap to have someone like Alex here. It's not like we don't. I am famously expensive.

SPEAKER_115: This is an expensive talent you have on this program. Ruinously costly. But if you do want to dig out more about Claude, you can go check it out at claude.ai

SPEAKER_138: slash twist. And now I'm going to get five internal points.

SPEAKER_68: All right. Listen, another amazing episode of This Week in Startups is in the can, as my dear friend Leo Laporte would say. Another twit is in the can. Shout out to my guy. Shout out to all the people who made podcasting happen. My friend Dave Weiner created RSS.

Chamath Palihapitiya: Big part of my career. I sent him a little note just thanking him for the impact his technology had on my career. So thank you to my friend, Adam Curry, who created podcasting along with Dave Weiner. He's got a great show. No agenda. He's doing this like podcasting 2.0 thing. Oliver, I want to book him for the show, please. Adam Curry. Would love to have Dave Weiner on and hear what he's up to. He's working on some content management systems using WordPress, I understand. And Leo Laporte for being a pioneer in the space and teaching a lot of us how to be broadcasters.

SPEAKER_68: So thanks to all those legends. They don't get any credit. Like Theo Vaughn doesn't know who Dave Weiner is. Theo Vaughn, you know, Joe Rogan knows who Adam Curry is because he has him on his podcast.

Chamath Palihapitiya: If you want to see Adam Curry on a podcast, he does Joe Rogan once in a while. Adam Curry had convinced Steve Jobs to in iTunes.

SPEAKER_04: iTunes was where music used to exist on your laptop and would put the music on your iPod before there was. Is our audience that young? Yeah, before there was, yes. Before there was an iPhone, there was an iPod and he convinced them to have in the menu, add RSS feed. Oh, wow. And you would cut and paste the RSS feed from somebody's blog or podcast and put it into iTunes and then it would sync it to your iPod.

SPEAKER_68: If that hadn't happened and Adam Curry and Dave Weiner didn't do it, there would be no Joe Rogan.

SPEAKER_200: There would be no all in. There would be no.

SPEAKER_17: Ah, so they're responsible for the second Trump administration. I see. Oh God. Please don't. It's Dave one.

SPEAKER_292: Dave, we're coming on the show. You want to know who's responsible for the second Trump administration? It's pretty simple. The Democrats did not field a qualified team. Jason, Jason.

SPEAKER_130: Joke. Joke. Joke.

SPEAKER_04: We don't need to get serious. That's a dad joke. No, I just, I hate the fact that people think that like this, like podcasters created this. You have to field the team. Yeah. This is my message to the Democrats, like field the team. You can't put rec players, you can't put a retired player against Kobe Bryant. You got to have like a sharp player if you're going to be up against like a media savant like Trump.

SPEAKER_200: Yeah. Oh. Disgraciad. I mean, a Democratic party is just so frustrating. Ay, ay, ay. Bring me the America party. That's what I want. We'll see you all next time. Have a great weekend. Enjoy the long weekend. Enjoy the long weekend.

SPEAKER_297: We'll see you guys on Tuesday.