SPEAKER_00: Hey, everybody, we've got an amazing show for you today. It's all news. It's Monday, there's a lot going on, including Pete Davidson, who seems to be at the top of everybody's trending topics, three days a week is going to space. Hey, incredibly shrewd marketing move by Jeff Bezos. And Chad is going to space. What else we got on the docket?

SPEAKER_02: Okay, we literally thought we could avoid the Pete Davidson news. But he came for us even here in the world of technology. Um, update on the technology industry and what it's doing in

SPEAKER_03: the war. Clearview AI is apparently offering its facial recognition services to the Ukrainian government. We have a skepticism filled conversation about that.

SPEAKER_00: Yeah, is that a good idea or not? Here's a great idea. The New York Times just launched a telegram channel where they're publishing so that people maybe in authoritarian countries might

SPEAKER_08: get access to their coverage of what's happening in Ukraine. And what a great idea. Yeah, that channel.

SPEAKER_02: Good innovation and then semiconductor slowdowns keep impacting automakers and they're getting worse because of shutdowns over COVID in China. Ford is actually shipping their explorers now without rear air conditioning controls. Why go on?

SPEAKER_12: Oh, my Lord. No rear air conditioning controls. You have to ask the driver to change the temperature. Oh, my Lord, like the olden days. Oh, what next? Oh, what to do? Anyway, but it's a big

SPEAKER_00: deal. It's a big economic story. We do have issues with the supply chain and the sadly, it looks like outbreaks in Shenzhen of COVID that could again, create the never ending supply chain issues that have been dog in the world for the last two plus years. It's gonna

SPEAKER_20: be a great show. Nonetheless, stick with us. This week in

SPEAKER_19: startups is brought to you by lemon.io need to speed up your

SPEAKER_21: product development without draining your budget. Hire vetted engineers from Europe at lemon.io. Go to lemon.io slash twist to get 15% off for the first four weeks. Boast. If you're a startup developing new software or R&D, you may be owed up to $250,000 in cash back from the government. Boast helps you get that money quickly and easily. The first 50 customers will get 10% off their first year by mentioning promo code twist at boast.ai slash twist. And our crowd helps you invest early in pre IPO companies alongside professional VCs. If you're interested in investing, you can join our crowd for free at O U R C R O W D.com slash twist.

SPEAKER_23: So space tourism just continues to get bigger and bigger and more

SPEAKER_02: celebrity driven because this by God is America. The latest announcement is that blue origin has chosen Saturday night lives most effective attention getter in history. Pete Davidson to go on its next new shepherd flight on March 23rd. It's fascinating. I mean, I

Chamath Palihapitiya: think you got to give Bezos a lot of credit because he puts a celebrity

SPEAKER_31: on each one of these. I think he was on the first. Yep. He had William Shatner on one. Uh, now he's got Pete Davidson and this is the

SPEAKER_34: fourth flight, I think. So it is. Yeah, it's blue origins 20th mission, but I think the fourth one commercial flight. Yeah, at least famous people. Yeah. I think you

SPEAKER_38: counted by the number of famous people. Uh, and he also had the, um, famous, uh, female,

SPEAKER_40: um, astronaut. I forgot her name. He did. Yeah. No, the woman who wanted, who was an aviator who had wanted to be an astronaut and couldn't. They kiboshed. And then she got

SPEAKER_02: to go, she, you know, I mean, she did become, become a really famous aviator, but then she got to go on the flight and that was a little, it was a weep worthy. It was a good one. So this will include, let's see, uh, Marty Allen, Pete Davidson, husband and wife duo, Sharon and Mark Hagel, Jim kitchen, and Dr. George kneeled the fourth. A bunch of rich people,

SPEAKER_31: right? It's at, it's still 50 grand to go a hundred grand or something. It's, I don't know what it costs to go up in this thing, but I feel like when this hits a hundred

SPEAKER_28: thousand or less, like basically the, the cost of a private jet across the country is like, I think 30, 40 grand I've never done it. Um, but that's my understanding. So when it gets to kind of that price, uh, I think it's going to become very popular. I think this is going to become like the bucket list item. And I, I don't know, would you, would you do this after, you know, they have a hundred successful flights? Is this

SPEAKER_02: on your bucket list, Molly? I don't know if it's on my bucket list. I wouldn't say that it's not exactly. Well, I guess that means no, right. If it's not specifically on my list, then I guess it's not on my list, but it's not not on my list. I would certainly, I think take the opportunity. It's like one of those interesting questions though. You know how like you're waiting for the bus and the bus doesn't come for a really long time. And you're, then you start to have a sunk cost situation about the bus. Like, well, it's eventually going to come anyway. I guess what I'm trying to say is four times doesn't feel that safe, but then a hundred times you're just getting to the point where things are starting to break down. So like, what's the, what's the most comfortable moment? I think it's the opposite. I don't

SPEAKER_53: think these things like break down. I think they get like, yeah, more cemented in like, and they get better and dialed in. So I, for me, it's somewhere like, I would

SPEAKER_54: do it after 250 to 500 successful missions. And it feels to me like they're gonna be doing

SPEAKER_00: these weekly. And then you have Virgin has theirs. Um, and the Virgin Galactic one is

SPEAKER_56: interesting. I don't have any equity in it, even though my friends backed it, but I saw

SPEAKER_57: Virgin Galactic ads on Twitter, which I thought was the sign that this is now ready for serious

SPEAKER_00: commercialization. Wow. Now they had, I think two or 300 RSVPs. I think they're looking for more RSVPs. Cause this means that they want to fill seats and they expect they're going to have opening

SPEAKER_64: soon and they're going to get through those 200 or 400 RSVPs. Yeah. So it's pretty cool. I think

SPEAKER_02: it's good. So the chat is talking about like Francis Centaur in our chats talking about Tokyo and 90 minutes being heaven. Like, I sort of wonder at what point could we use this sort of near orbit access and speed to maybe actually take us places on earth faster. That's what I really want. You know, I'm an efficiency minded person. So I'm like, that's kind of cool that I could go into

SPEAKER_11: near orbit or whatever, and be like a pseudo astronaut and stuff. But like, what I really want is something like rocket ship Concord. Yes, that's what I want as well. I tweeted. It's interesting that

SPEAKER_28: you bring this up because that's what I tweeted this weekend. When I saw the ad, I was like, for me, the big win is what space X is doing. They're going to do point to point in the world. Um, and I think they can hold 300 people on theirs, which is bonkers. I think that'll be five or 10 years out. Yeah. Uh, but that's like truly going to space. And they said one hour or less anywhere on the globe, because the higher you go, the F the curvature of the earth, I guess becomes narrower then. So you're not like flying over an arc, you're kind of going straight up and straight down, right? Because the aperture would be so narrow that, you know, if you're in Texas, you go straight up some number of, you know, distance and then coming down to, let's say, Tokyo, or Fiji, or Antarctica, I'm thinking like

SPEAKER_73: really hard to get to places that would be incredible. Imagine being in Antarctica in one hour. I mean, that would be bonkers from Texas. And that's like, that's a total,

SPEAKER_28: like really interesting, um, adventure. And I think that's five to 10 years away,

SPEAKER_00: but it's going to be absurdly expensive. I think it becomes like this crazy bucket list item for people. I think the reason it's not on people's bucket list items, because it's generally has not been

SPEAKER_78: available. Right, exactly. And there's a, I mean, I guess bucket list items often include a high risk of

SPEAKER_00: death, depending on who you are. And I certainly certainly I have friends who just started doing, uh, I have friends who just started doing skydiving, you know, these guys get to 50. And they're like, you know what, I made a bunch of money. What's an interesting way for me to, you know, go out.

SPEAKER_86: That's kind of pedestrian at this point skydiving, like, I mean, it is amazing how, how humans tend

SPEAKER_02: to think of like more and more incredible ways to die, though. I actually I read, there was a piece

SPEAKER_11: about William Shackleton, who was the Antarctic explorer. He's that's the ship they just found. Yeah, Shackleton, they found his ship. Yeah. And it's in perfect shape. And it's in perfect shape. And then I went and read this like, very long read about that expedition. Yes, the one where the endurance sank and it is the most bananas survival story. There were like 50, got 55 guys on that ship. They all ended up surviving, but they were split up across the continent, Shackleton,

SPEAKER_02: and then they were like, I had to eat their sled. Like, it's pretty insane what people can survive.

SPEAKER_92: That was a huge departure. Uh, yeah, but in 1915 story, uh, it became frozen. The reason people are

SPEAKER_28: really into Shackleton in the entrepreneurial community is they like to take the, you know, it's pretty much three metaphors for startups and entrepreneurship, war, team sports, and then being an adventurer and for good reason, because, you know, most of the companies don't work out.

SPEAKER_01: Uh, die, uh, if you want to attribute it that way, but, uh, yeah, they were, they, uh, departed South Georgia for the Wendell sea on December 5th. And, uh, they encountered a bunch of ice and, uh, they grew worse. And on January 15th, it became frozen in the ice flow.

SPEAKER_84: And so I crushed it, crushed it. And everybody had to get out of, can you imagine you're like in the middle of ice and you got to get out and get on life rafts or whatever. Oh yeah.

SPEAKER_02: Yeah. And they're pulling like life rafts across the ice. I mean, it's pretty bananas. The whole story is bananas. And then like, they're all, they had to take a, one of these crappy little lifeboats, like 80 miles to get to another Island to, and then try to like, and then like walk across, you know, this, that huge island. It just is like, I don't know. It's I'm all over the place here, but it's basically like, it is the human way to push the envelope just for the sake of pushing.

SPEAKER_100: And I don't, you know, I mean, I think we get a lot out of it over time, but this is what you

SPEAKER_103: want to see. This is the want to add. It's so funny. These guys, this is good producing guys.

SPEAKER_28: Cause I literally have it up on my screen at the same time. So the reason I brought this up before is, uh, you know, I've told a lot of folks, when you're doing a startup, you want to be candid with the people you're hiring of exactly what the odds are. And frequently in startup land, we, we referenced the famous Shackleton ad where it says men wanted for hazardous journey,

SPEAKER_00: small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness, constant danger, uh, safe return, doubtful honor and recognition in case of success. Ernest Shackleton for Burlington street,

SPEAKER_105: but we're Burlington street. It's so great. It's remarkable. I just love the last line, honor and recognition in case of success, just in case it's basically describing startup land.

SPEAKER_11: Thank you producers, by the way, who also multitasking put in Wally Funk. That's the name of the woman aviator who now gets to say astronaut at 82 years old. Yeah. I mean,

SPEAKER_02: I have no problem with this industry commercializing to sort of become more and more mainstream and normalize the whole concept. And also at some point, one of these things is probably going to blow up and somebody famous is going to be on board. And I don't know what that does to the industry. We'll see. Like they're ready. I am in no way trying to suggest that these companies are not ready to be doing what they're doing. And it's also a pretty dangerous business. So like,

SPEAKER_00: there will be a, uh, yeah, there'll be a moment like that for sure. And the question is like self-driving or any new technology, uh, V tolls will have this moment as

SPEAKER_58: well. Can society, uh, deal with that dissonance new, safer, new and safer, but somebody just died.

SPEAKER_28: Right. And you know, that is, and there's actually a seminal case right now of somebody who ran a red

SPEAKER_00: light while using autopilot. And I think it was like an early version of autopilot. Like the one

SPEAKER_64: that just is like level two, keep your car in the lane and go a certain speed. So like, who's responsible for that? It's like, I think we know is responsible. Like, you know, it's, it's literally, you're doing adaptive cruise control and not looking for red lights on the street. Well, yeah, yeah, totally. There are people who will stand on the top of their motorcycle like on YouTube. You can see 100% people doing crazy stuff. So you have to kind of discount them.

SPEAKER_02: Well, it's kind of like the American way though, to blame somebody else and sue them for the thing that you caused. So that's, what's so interesting here is like, it's, you've got this natural tendency and all this, you know, this sort of like ambulance chasing law industry, waiting for the opportunity to blame someone else for a thing that happened to you. So then when it ends up being something really big and explodey, what it will, I mean, I agree, we'll see, right? It's like part of the process of normalizing it is going to be knowing that something like this will happen. And how will

SPEAKER_85: we deal when it does in related news, Kanye West is trying to buy one of the five other seats on me.

SPEAKER_02: Exactly. Kanye West is going to be like shining a laser at it as

SPEAKER_56: it takes off. Like, I mean, mental illness plus social media is such a bad combination.

SPEAKER_64: I've said it before, but like this, I don't want to get into like the blow by blows. But this weekend was like, my entire Twitter feed was an Instagram was Kanye West and skeet fighting. Uh, just crazy. Yeah, it's kind of sad to watch people, especially because when it involves parenting, that's like the heartbreaking part. It's like, can somebody who's friends with this individual pull them aside and

SPEAKER_00: say like, just stop talking about your kids on social media. This is like, this is like therapy questions, like couples therapy, mediation stuff. Don't put it there. But I, I, uh, I'm excited to

SPEAKER_28: do the transportation one. And then let's see the cost here. Virgin 150 K deposit 450 K total price. They got a hundred tickets sold 15 million. Wow. Sales from deposits. That's a good start. And then,

SPEAKER_00: you know, this is going to quickly go down. So if it's 450, you think of it like getting the first Tesla roadster was 160, I think, and now they're down to 60. So I would say this goes down by a third in 10 years. So if it goes down by a third, you know, lower, it goes down by two thirds, rather it's one third, the price. I think you can see people doing this for a hundred K or less. And I think that's when it becomes like, people will crowd fund it or they'll be giving it away on the Z boarding zoo, go to space. So we're going to have a space race brought to you by, I mean, it will literally be, I think, uh, there'll be sponsors doing this and all kinds of interesting stuff.

SPEAKER_126: When you're scaling your startup quickly, hiring engineers can slow you down like nothing else. We all know that. Well, here's some good news for you. Lemon.io will find you the perfect candidate within, wait for it, 48 hours. I kid you not. And what is Lemon.io you ask? They're a marketplace of engineers from Europe, where some of the greatest engineers in the world are based and they'll match you with a candidate again within just 48 hours. That's two days for those of you doing the math at home. And if it doesn't work out, they're going to replace the developer right away. So there is no risk for you with the founder of a startup, and they test and interview every developer to eliminate the risk of a failed project. So we got a testimonial from launch portfolio founder, Drew Fabrikant. And he told us that Lemon was a game changer for his startup Scout, which is a lead gen platform. They do great stuff. They were under the gun. They needed to hire a developer with a very specific skillset as soon as possible. And Lemon delivered. And they were a pleasure to work with, according to my pal Drew. So not only did they find exactly what they were looking for, but Lemon also delivered them a second engineer really fast. What a great story. So here's your call to action. If you could use a full-time or part-time developer to run your projects faster, I want you to go to lemon.io slash twist. Again, lemon.io slash twist. And you're going to receive a 15% discount for the first four weeks of work with a developer. What a great deal. Okay, let's go on to this New York

SPEAKER_129: Times story, which I thought was super interesting. The New York Times has launched a Telegram channel.

SPEAKER_00: For people who don't know, Telegram is exceptional at groups, it seems. And when a lot of the alt right was kicked off of Twitter, they started their own groups. So people like Milo Yiannopoulos, uh, who, but 15 years ago was like a normal journalist, uh, working, I think at the Guardian or the Times of London. And he kind of went off the, uh, alt-right deep end. He got banned from Twitter. I think Alex Jones, Trump, all of them set up shop on Telegram. Um, so you can have like really big groups, but New York

SPEAKER_64: Times, uh, Brazilian, uh, Bureau Chief Jack Nickas, I hope I'm pronouncing that correct, said this is important. The New York Times just launched a Telegram channel. And for now, it will broadcast

SPEAKER_01: our reporting about the war in Ukraine. It'll hopefully be a powerful new source of free, reliable information for many people. Um, you can follow it here. Um, for those who don't know, the short URL system for, um, for Telegram rather is t.me. So it's t.me slash New York Times. And you just add the group. It also works really well on your desktop. So what's really neat about this is if they wanted to, uh, you could have replies in here. It could be two way. They could, you know, you can have all kinds of different permutations of groups as you do on the web. Uh, but this will be a little bit censorship resistant, I think. Uh, and, uh, you can also access it through the tour browser. Uh, if you don't know what that is, or brave, a tour is an anonymous relay system that theoretically can't be tracked, but it might've been made by the FBI and the CIA. They might have

SPEAKER_132: actually built it. So take it for what it's worth. It's hard to say, hard to say. It's hard to say,

SPEAKER_136: but they do seem to catch a lot of predators on there and crazy people. So it's interesting

SPEAKER_02: though, because in many ways, the biggest barrier to free and reliable information and say what you will about the New York times, but you know, they have a lot of boots on the ground in a lot of places is the paywall. So I do think that there's a lot. I mean, there's a lot of value in this for a lot of reasons. One is that it might be able to be accessed by people in lots of different stories, uh, lots of different countries who might've had trouble accessing and otherwise, but also if it's not paywalled, I think that I think there's real value. I think there's this real question. And, you know, I think that journalism needs a business model that works, but at the same time, when all, when everything that's reliable and high quality is behind a paywall

SPEAKER_140: and everything that is, you know, not is free. Yes. You have a real have and have not situation when it comes to information. So I think it's well, and what's nice about this is there's nobody who

SPEAKER_141: is a subscriber to the New York times who is upset that one sliver of the New York times at this moment

SPEAKER_00: in time is available freely. It's not like it damages our subscriptions to the New York times that

SPEAKER_64: they're now doing this free. No, of course not. Yeah. No, you know, uh, but it should be right.

SPEAKER_02: Like the wall street journal has been making this, uh, information about Ukraine free and outside the paywall and tweeting it as such. And I don't know if the times has until now. So, yeah, I mean,

SPEAKER_28: that's the other option. They could have just said anything tagged on the website, but what I really think this is about is censorship resistance. I think it's very easy to block New York times.com.

SPEAKER_00: Right. And by putting it to multiple channels, I would, yes, they're going to do this on some other platforms as well. Um, and this is also where I think some of the social media platforms could do something good. Like Facebook could conceivably, uh, say, Hey, New York times, uh, we will pay you a penny, uh, as a licensing fee or, you know, whatever a dollar per thousand, uh, you know, a fraction of a penny, whatever, you know, they come up with for everybody in Europe who reads a Ukraine related story on Facebook. So we'll give you a million dollars to license these stories for the next six months or a year on the platform. And we'll have a special section, facebook.com slash NYT Ukraine. Uh, and that would be a nice thing if Facebook ever shot the lock off their wallet and decided to pay content creators. Although there is some rumor that Facebook has some secret covert licensing deal with the New York times where they ship like 10, 20 million dollars. I've seen people talk about this relationship. I think the New York times has even talked about it where they're getting some licensing or some money from Facebook, but I guess they don't like to talk about it all that much, um, because they don't want it to overshadow coverage. And then there was also like reportedly some $5 million ad buy for those ads that like Facebook

SPEAKER_64: thinks the new internet needs to be, I don't know if you watch like the Sunday morning news programs.

SPEAKER_00: Did you get like during, during all of those hearings? Yeah. Facebook had a series of like,

SPEAKER_28: wow, the internet has changed so much in the last decade. It's hard to figure out what information is. We should come up with a new rule set and Facebook really supports a new way to think about,

SPEAKER_00: you know, it's like trying to influence people watching, meet the press or face the nation or, you know, state of the union kind of audience. Uh, and I thought that was kind of interesting,

SPEAKER_64: but it was also, they bought all these podcasts off. And I remember Kara Swisher talking about, she's like, I'm not reading that ad. So she like declined because of the optics. Yeah. It's one thing to read a Casper ad or a eight sleep ad. It's another thing to be like, I cover Facebook and how it's killing democracy. And let me read an ad.

SPEAKER_05: I mean, they are, they are aggressive about advertising. I haven't seen them on the Sunday

SPEAKER_02: news shows, but they are very aggressive about advertising within news properties. Like they advertise on Axios and I do hear them on a lot of podcasts. Yeah.

SPEAKER_38: Were they on marketplace too or no? I don't think so.

SPEAKER_00: Yeah. See, that's the thing is people are like, there's a perfect moment.

SPEAKER_166: But honestly, I don't know.

SPEAKER_00: Well, exactly. So people assume the hosts like, oh, it's influencing the hosts. Like the hosts don't even, in a lot of cases, the hosts don't even know.

SPEAKER_11: Like sometimes we would get a note about somebody being an underwriter at marketplace and be like, wait, what? Really? I mean, I, in that case, I w I would say I maybe had more idea at other

SPEAKER_02: outlets, but certainly not public radio. No.

SPEAKER_163: Well, and you're savaging them, right? Yeah. Like, oh, that wait, didn't we just

SPEAKER_11: tell me the only time we would find out is if we did mention like one producer was in charge of

SPEAKER_02: making sure that if we mentioned an underwriter, then we would say they're an underwriter. So sometimes you'll hear NPR say that because Facebook is you have to be an underwriter of

SPEAKER_00: unintended collision. So in the magazine business, we used to have somebody who would look at the stories

SPEAKER_28: and the ads and just make sure that the story on the left did not in some way reference the story, the ad on the right or the page before it. So that somebody who was reading about, you know,

SPEAKER_85: some criticism of IBM did not turn the page and get a Watson ad or some pro story about Watson would

SPEAKER_00: be, you know, in the editor's letter. And then, you know, the front, the back page would be like, uh, we got to, you know, the appearance of impropriety was always challenging. Yeah.

SPEAKER_81: Not that anybody cares anymore. That was like, I was gonna say, that was the good old days. Now

SPEAKER_02: it's like, I mean, I remember being at CNET and it was like, you could, Samsung was not allowed to run

Jason Calacanis: an ad on a review page of a Samsung phone, for example. Now it's like, Samsung has a huge, like a

SPEAKER_11: webpage takeover, like, and then a big banner. And then you read that, you know, and it just stopped.

SPEAKER_180: And they're in the CNET labs and the like, there's giant Samsung logo brought to you. Well, come on, not exactly. Welcome to Gordon Ramsey,

SPEAKER_183: cooking with Gordon Ramsey, brought to you by wheat, a wheat council. If you're a startup

SPEAKER_28: developing new software or investing in R&D, you may be owed up to $250,000 in cash back from the government. But the R&D tax credit program is very complicated, it requires a bunch of technical and financial justifications for the IRS. And that's where Boast can help you. Boast is a platform that helps startups get cash back from the government. They integrate with over 60 different software providers, which automates document gathering. This helps Boast deliver the fastest IRS compliant R&D tax credit claim in the industry. This helps Boast deliver the fastest IRS compliant R&D tax claim in the industry. Companies like Bevy Labs and Dooley have recovered hundreds of thousands of dollars with Boast over the past few years. So what's the cost? Well, Boast only makes money once you've gotten your cash back. If you don't get paid, they don't get paid either. If you do, they take a modest percentage between 10 and 20%, depending on your volume. So the upside is free money from the IRS. Sounds pretty good to me. And the downside is no risk. So here's your call to action. The deadline to claim is approaching fast. So contact Boast today. The first 50 customer signups will get 10% off their first year of filing. Just mentioned the promo code twist at boast dot AI slash twist. That's B O A S T dot AI slash twist.

SPEAKER_05: All right, let's do this clear for you. I sorry, because that's fascinating. Yeah, exactly. Because

SPEAKER_02: when it comes to Clearview, I have questions. Clearview AI is giving Ukraine's defense ministry free access to its spatial recognition search engine. And evidently, Clearview is saying you could potentially use this to vet people of interest at security checkpoints, to identify the dead, to reunite refugees with separated families, to identify Russian operatives and help the government take down false social media posts on war. Yeah, fascinating. We actually had the founder,

SPEAKER_64: thank you. Sorry. No, we had the founder want on tap on the podcast episode 1100 back in August of 2020.

SPEAKER_00: And he demoed the product for us. There was a lot of controversy around the startup because they took publicly available pictures, made their own databases. And then we're giving it to law enforcement, law enforcement would buy it so that they could if they took a picture of a perp, somebody committed a crime, they wouldn't want to give their driver's license or something. Or they had somebody on a camera robbing a house or a business, they could maybe find them through social media. And of course, it turns out like high correlation between criminals and, you know, usage of social media. Obviously, when they were raising money, there was this other rumor that they had given complimentary accounts to a bunch of right wing kind of folks. And those folks, you would use it to take pictures of women and then reverse image look up a woman at a bar to find their social media and other creepy nonsense. They raised money from Peter Thiel. And so it's part of the whole

SPEAKER_01: right wing privacy conundrum kind of group. But let's like this through sort of beyond that.

SPEAKER_193: I mean, yeah, Clearview AI. I mean, it's been fined at least once I'm looking this up. It was

SPEAKER_02: recently fined in Italy $20 million over privacy. Well, it's sort of like the or I'm sorry, 20 million pounds. It's like the company that has kickstarted in a lot of cities, you know, attempts to ban facial recognition technology because it can be used so poorly in some cases, and I would just be it can be abused. Yeah, I mean, I'm very worried.

SPEAKER_117: Because it's actually super effective, right? Like it actually the technology now works brilliantly. Well, no, it can be abused because it like can't tell the difference between,

SPEAKER_02: you know, one black person and another black person. Oh, okay. Like it can be abused in terms of parse what you're saying.

SPEAKER_201: And I think it may have even been implicated. That's what I was trying to find. I think it

SPEAKER_02: might have been implicated in a very specific false recognition case, but I gotta look that up. Um, I mean, it's gonna be, I think, look, introducing a tool like this, which is, has been under all kinds of fire and, and brought a ton of controversy into a war zone to me feels like not a good idea.

SPEAKER_00: Yeah. So the question is, yeah, I mean, in all these cases, what is it being used for? Right. Right. If it was being used to take a picture of a dead soldier tragically to inform the family, you know, possibly that we may have identified your missing child, or there's a missing young person, uh, who got separated from their parents and they're not dead, but they're on the border of Poland and you want to find their parents. Like, so the abuse is always the issue with these. And that was one of the things I drilled down with the founder on. And I found his answers were, um, kind of hit or miss. Because I was like, is there a tracking system? It's like, absolutely, there's a tracking audit system. I'm like, great. So you have like the records of everybody who used

SPEAKER_28: it. So if somebody was using it to stalk their ex or stalk somebody or do some nefarious thing, you would know, he's like, well, no, that's the job of the local police department. They have the audit

SPEAKER_00: logs. I'm like, so the local police who would abuse it also have the audit logs. Like, shouldn't you have a backup auto log? So, well, that's their decision. Like, and that's sort of like, uh, you know, like, well, they could put, you know, their mayor in charge of the audit log or their, you know, ethics department, you know, in San Francisco in charge of the audit logs, the DA, whoever, and when the police use it or a detective uses it, it would be logged, but they didn't have their own clarity on that. I felt it could have been like, they could have been more proactively scanning for abuse, but you know, I'm sure they've gotten a lot of feedback on it.

SPEAKER_02: Yeah. I don't know. I mean, I, I don't think it was implicated in that very specific false positive case that I was thinking about. Although New Jersey bandit over after some false positives, it's just like, uh, I don't know. It just is sort of this larger question of like, is that what

SPEAKER_141: is that what is necessary right now? Yeah. You know, I, the way I look at these tools is

SPEAKER_00: with massive controls and a warrant. So I think the problem with this tool is if you give the frontline people, whether it's police or soldiers access to do it, the chances of abuse are almost certain, right? Chances of false positive, you know, that's happens

SPEAKER_64: with witnesses, right? Like a witness can give you a false positive. Uh, you know, they look at those books of mugshots, classically, as in every police drama episode. So therefore, if this was something

SPEAKER_28: where a judge could say, Oh, you want to take this pictures of the person who was murdered on the BART,

SPEAKER_00: you have two suspects, run it through Clearview, you get your list of potential perps, then you have some delicate way of making sure that you're not knocking down the door and getting in a firefight with people where you're just, you know, deftly figuring out could they possibly have been in the area during that time, that would be my easy solution for this is to make it a warrant. Like I

SPEAKER_64: think facial recognition to use that should just be something people have to file a warrant for a judge looks at it. It's like a wiretap reasonable now. What do you think of my solution? Um, yeah, I agree.

SPEAKER_02: I just think and then as a result, because there's going to be time involved no matter what, then I don't know if I see there being a significant difference between that system, so to speak, and using AI, you know, like, they're going to photograph soldiers, they're going to have a database like I don't know that this is additive. And if anything, it feels like it could increase the

SPEAKER_217: chance of like, um, people are pointing out in the chat, misidentifying somebody at a border

SPEAKER_219: checkpoint and getting them shot. Yeah. Like, I mean, that's the don't, you know, like if you don't

SPEAKER_11: know that it's perfect, don't introduce it in a battlefield situation. I just sort of feel like

SPEAKER_118: that's not, this does not feel like it has the potential to help as much as it could hurt. That is,

SPEAKER_64: I think well said you, with this new technology, you're going to have to know, is this like nine,

SPEAKER_00: nine, five nines or 98%. And there's a one in 50 chance of misidentifying somebody with this technology, right? If it was during an investigation of a robbery, well, there's probably a little

SPEAKER_28: downside. But if it's in a battlefield, or a cop is pulling somebody over at a traffic stop, and it misidentifies somebody as like a felon, who's, you know, got a history of like, gun trafficking, like, okay, now you've got six cop cars surrounding somebody who's misidentified, and the chances of a

SPEAKER_02: tragedy occurring is like, here is the story to thank you, Serge dog for pulling up the story. In the New York Times about this New Jersey man, this did cause them to to block it where Clearview misidentified this guy, and police arrested him, a black man, of course, because this is where so many of these identification issues tend to come up as people of color, the police identified him using Clearview software, and accused him arrested him accusing him of shoplifting candy and trying to hit a police officer with a car. Hmm, totally not him, like was not him. And he was the third

SPEAKER_148: person known to be falsely arrested based on bad facial recognition data.

SPEAKER_141: Yeah, it does seem like these technologies are using data sets.

SPEAKER_02: They inferred that Clearview was they inferred they were they're not 100% sure they know that the New Jersey Police Department was using Clearview AI, and then he was falsely identified by software possible or should be very specific about Yes, exactly. The legal implications here. Yes. Anyway, all I'm saying is, I don't think that's good enough to use on the battlefield. That doesn't seem additive to me. That seems like attempting to insert yourself into a situation where the the benefits are dubious, and the harms are large.

SPEAKER_37: Yeah, and this technology will also be able to clear people in some instances. And in some instances,

SPEAKER_00: it's like the DNA stuff, like anytime this new technology comes out, when the DNA stuff came out, it wasn't accurate enough. And then it wound up exonerating a bunch of people 10 years later. So

SPEAKER_01: there is definitely some clear eyed application issues here, you got to go into this with very good intent. And you're going to have to be reserving judgment, and using it, maybe as a way to steer you to possibilities of suspects or clearing people's names. But it's it's not fully ready for prime time. What

SPEAKER_28: is your general thought? I've never asked. We never had this conversation. What's your general

SPEAKER_01: thought on cameras in cities, UK packed with cameras, China obviously packed with cameras. So you have authoritarian and democracies, both deploying this for safety. And then you have I think San Francisco, and Oakland have filed to preemptively ban like citywide camera systems, or maybe the

SPEAKER_40: storing of data, which you have a feeling on it. I'm curious.

SPEAKER_03: I mean, surveillance is super problematic. Like it's a society problem. Like I remember

SPEAKER_02: when Google Glass early on, had to get rid of facial recognition, like I was one of the people in Google Glass first came out. And I was like, Oh, my god, that would be so awesome. If I had a contact lens or glasses where I could just look at somebody, and it would recognize their face, and it would give me their like, current stats, you know, like, what's their last tweet, like superhuman does, what are their last couple of tweets? And what's their calendar? And we know, what's their sort of publicly available social information like that would be so useful to go up and down the street, and get this real time stream of data about people. And then that was my own night maivete in a way about how good that technology could be, and whether people have a right to privacy, like, if people have a right to privacy, you can't put cameras all over, and you can't put them in glasses. And you can't, you know, try to identify someone's face and maybe get it wrong and get them like, cancelled on the street because of, you know, a miss, a misattributed tweet, like it just is, ultimately, always going to be a problem.

Jason Calacanis: And yet we've opted into so much surveillance that I'm not sure it's a problem, we can even stop at this point. If that makes sense.

SPEAKER_233: Some notes about Singapore. Yeah, Singapore is like bananas.

SPEAKER_129: They plan to double the number of police cameras to more than 200,000 over the next decade. They currently have 90,000 cameras and 270 square miles, which is 330 police cameras per

SPEAKER_235: square mile, according to Reuters. That's bonkers. You know, there is, I, I guess the real question

SPEAKER_02: is like, would you rather have police watching you? Or would you rather have ring? Would you rather have like, Google, and or, you know, and a company surveilling you or governments?

SPEAKER_00: I think the cat's out of the bag, people have the right to put cameras in and around their homes, that seems reasonable. Therefore, there will be cameras in most places. So and then police will just get that police will have access to it through just asking for it. I mean, citizens can

SPEAKER_64: give as their is their right to give over the police, give to the police, somebody who runs through their backyard, a friend of mine had somebody run through their backyard, were robbing their neighbor

SPEAKER_00: last week. And then I had somebody last night and both in LA, both in the same area of LA, West Hollywood, and they both live like uphills and stuff like that. So one had some of my friend last night, had somebody

SPEAKER_01: just walk up to his glass door and start knocking on the doors of deranged person. And then the other person had somebody run through the backyard, both caught on cameras. So I don't know if the deterrent thing is working with people who are right. I mean, I'm not sure it doesn't. I think it works for

SPEAKER_64: criminals. It doesn't work for people who are high, or mentally. Yeah, they're just like, Oh, a camera, who cares? I'm like, high out of my mind, or I'm, or mentally ill, or I'm suffering from both

Jason Calacanis: tragically. Well, and the police don't always come. And frankly, there are situations when I don't want the police to come because I don't want somebody to get shot because they're mentally ill or on drugs. Like, that's a challenge. I mean, that's a real conversation in Oakland about when is it even morally acceptable to call the police because you don't want to get

SPEAKER_140: somebody killed, because they can't get the right services. Yeah, if it's a mentally ill person,

SPEAKER_116: and then you're now in this weird situation where you're feeling empathy for a person who's mentally ill, and then you have to protect your family. Right. And they're on your property. Yeah.

SPEAKER_02: Right. I think it's like, it's one of these questions where like, no, I don't like it. And I do not believe for a second that, you know, does privacy matter if you have nothing to lose? Is that or nothing to hide is a reasonable approach? Because first of all, anybody, if you could do enough digging has something to hide and misidentification and misattribution are real.

Jason Calacanis: And my favorite word, and cameras are freaking everywhere. Like we might have already lost this

SPEAKER_28: battle. Yeah, I think the battles lost. The question is, who should have the keys to the kingdom? I like that that that is the actual question should cities just opt out of doing it? I think there's something even more reasonable here, which is kind of like COVID policy. I always

SPEAKER_00: felt like when things become more acute, like the hospitals fill up, you know, and there's no ICU beds, like maybe you have a different policy than when the hospitals are empty. And you know, like, you could have a different strategy depending on the weather forecast. So if you were in the San Francisco at this moment in time, the tenderloin, whatever places where there's a lot of guns and murder, or, you know, New York in the 70s or 80s, you have a lot of cameras. And then, you know, if you

SPEAKER_01: live in a place where there's not a lot of crime, and you need to have a few, you know, just have a few.

SPEAKER_129: It's time for another our crowd deal of the week. Right now, you can join our crowds investment in D ID. And according to their deal memo, D ID has patented reenactment technology, and their tech uses AI and deep learning to turn still photos into videos. D ID does this for fortune 500 companies. And they also have multimillion dollar deals with movie studios, social media companies, and online genealogy platforms according to their deal memo. So you can invest in D ID at our crowd.com slash twist today. All over the world, companies like D ID are innovating and driving returns for investors. And our crowd analyzes many of these companies, then they select the ones with the greatest growth potential and bring them to you from personalized medicine to cybersecurity, to the $50 billion video and synthetic media industry. Our crowd identifies innovators so you can invest when growth potential is greatest and that's early. So if you're an accredited investor, you can join our crowd for free at O U R C R O W D dot com slash twist and review their current deals. That's our crowd.com slash twist to sign up for free.

SPEAKER_201: I have tons of camera everywhere. You know, I would just commute to where there's no cameras and do my

SPEAKER_00: crime there. Uh, or, you know, there are some places where, you know, there just might be less cameras. I, I, we also had the person who has the software for license plate identifying. And that one is also particularly interesting. Uh, there is an open source project. I don't know about this Molly. That somebody made a flock to flock safety is the name of the company, which I wanted to invest in. Your community can set up a couple cameras on like the major arteries. It keeps 60, I think 30 days by default or 60 days of license plates. Crime happens. You look at here are the license plates that have been in this neighborhood, you know, five times or more. In other words, the people who live there, or, you know, 20 times or more, here are the license plates that are not. Let's start looking through those license plates and see if we can find people who maybe drove through the neighborhood or were on the block where the crime occurred. And if people are driving in to do crimes, pretty quick way to catch somebody. Yeah. Uh, and it's just data and they specifically don't take, uh, photos of the car. All they know is the license plate. So they've built the technology to scan the license plate, OCR it. You don't actually get a picture. And I was like, well, shouldn't you get the picture of the video of an encrypted of the, this way, you know, if somebody stole the car or if they were in the car, that'd be great evidence. Like, yeah, but then people would know who's going to what person's house, who's driving, which car, you know, like all the privacy

SPEAKER_28: concerns come up. Yeah. You could be thoughtful about this as the CEO of the company. If the CEO

SPEAKER_00: of the company says, we're never going to take the windshield picture, we're just going to take the license plate. That's enough data. It's kind of like the metadata over phone calls without recording the phone call. Right? I will say though, that's, that's yes. But don't people steal

SPEAKER_02: license plates all the time? Well, yeah, so then if you don't even match the license plate to the car, then you just go arrest some poor person who had their license plate. I wonder if they,

SPEAKER_00: I'm trying to remember the conversation. I think there might, it was episode 1249. So somebody can

SPEAKER_118: watch it, but I mean, these are all, yeah, these are just all after the fact bolt ons for crime, which is ultimately a social problem, right? Like, I just don't think you don't stop crime with

SPEAKER_02: surveillance. You just don't like you maybe catch criminals. Well, you may stop them. You may catch them before they do the next one. You may catch them before you do the next one, but they're not there. You know, they're being framed as this kind of like this thing that we have to have to stop

SPEAKER_140: crime. And I fundamentally do not believe that's what they do. You know, for some period of time,

SPEAKER_129: cameras were dissuading crime. There was that was proven that the presence of a camera would lower crime because people were putting even decoy cameras out. So if you when cameras were very

SPEAKER_00: expensive, they would put one real one and then just put the casings for 10 other ones around. But I don't know if that's still the case now. Yeah, I don't know. It might be that the true hardcore criminals. They don't care if they're on camera, right? Like, and the people who might have, you know, done opportunistic crime, I'm thinking like somebody who might have stolen a newspaper or something petty, might have done it like opportunistically, but they saw our camera, they didn't. But if you're in a gang, and like, that's one of the things about what's happening in San Francisco with the Walgreens and stuff like that. The feds came in and actually busted a giant crime ring like the DOJ came in. And it turned out it was like a super coordinated crime ring that was

SPEAKER_28: sending people in who were addicts. So it was like, people addicted to drugs going in. And when

SPEAKER_00: they would come out with their bag of stuff, they would just give them $1 pride. And they're like, here's the top 10 list. If you get any of these, you get $2 per item, they would ship those items to I think it was Oakland, or Alameda that had a warehouse, they busted the warehouse. And they were driving the stuff down to Los Angeles and San Diego, and they would just go to stores and say, you want any of these items for $4 each. And so somebody would buy, you know, razors or shampoo or condoms or whatever is a high ticket item. And they would give it to them for cash. And it was like, uh, it was literally a gang thing. So this idea that it was, you know, not coordinated was false. It was specifically a coordinated specific process, because you're like, is the person going in there and stealing 20 cans of one thing. Like they must have a fence somewhere to, to move this stuff.

SPEAKER_02: This is a big story. Um, and, and just a big sort of an additional canary in the coal mine, I think companies are now facing more production issues due to chip back orders caused by the Ukraine Russia conflict, but also that lockdowns in China, even just over the weekend got massive. So China has a bunch more COVID lockdowns. And, uh, according to the wall street journal that is impacting all kinds of raw materials, uh, Russia and Ukraine are causing shortages in term in neon and palladium specifically. And then evidently the auto industry has been hit the hardest specific automakers are being impacted. Ford is going to sell and deliver some explorers with limited features, including, um, no rear heating and some missing air conditioning controls. GM is no longer offering wireless charging HD radios and a fuel management mobile module that made some pickup trucks operate more efficiently. Tesla sold cars without USB ports. I can tell you that the pole star that I just got is missing the sensor where you can put your foot under the trunk, you know, like swipe your foot under and have it like auto open. And basically they're like, it's kind of a crap shoot at this point, whether your car has it or not. Cause it's all about whether this one part came in from China. And they put it in post like, yeah, they'll put it in later. Ah, cool. Yeah. But Bloomberg is reporting. This is the, this is where the, the China COVID lockdowns are just like becoming a massive double whammy here. Bloomberg reported that Foxconn, which of course produces iPhones has multiple factories in Shenzhen has been forced to pause operations in Shenzhen after the Chinese government

SPEAKER_140: imposed mandatory lockdowns due to a rise in COVID cases.

SPEAKER_00: I wonder if it's Omicron there or what the Chinese know that we don't, because we're going, it seems like the rest of the world is just, we're going to go through the eye of the storm. Or is it that they don't have the vaccines there? Cause they had a zero COVID policy and I guess they

SPEAKER_129: can shut things down and they have cheap testing. I understand $2 or something a person so they can test

SPEAKER_03: an entire city very quickly. Uh, I called a friend freaking out about this. Cause I was just like,

SPEAKER_281: I can't go back, but, but she made the really interesting point. We're like prisoners who are

SPEAKER_282: like, you're going to have to take me. I'm not, you're going to have to take me dead. I'm fighting to the end. I'm not going back to jail. I'm not doing it. I'm not going back. But she made the

SPEAKER_02: interesting point. Um, and I hope that this is the case that yes, because China did have sort of a zero COVID policy for a long time that there isn't actually broad based immunity. And we may say that we had a lot of like lockdowns in the U S but in fact we did, that was very regional. We had very spotty uptake of even basic intervention like masking. Um, and so, and our vaccines are a lot

Jason Calacanis: better and there's much more access to boosters. And so it does seem to be that China is still vulnerable to these big outbreaks, whether it's Omicron or BA two. Um, I think I even read there's

SPEAKER_02: like a Deltacron it's all happening now. Um, I don't hope that is the case in the case of China, because if they're still that vulnerable, a lot of people are going to die. What it likely suggests

SPEAKER_140: is that BA two is not going to sweep through the United States, for example, and like cause another way of the way that Omicron did. I was reading up on this this weekend because we had a

SPEAKER_64: little COVID outbreak at our house. Uh, so it feels like everybody's going to get it at some point. Everybody's fine. Uh, but, uh, it is definitely, you know, it's, it's pretty obvious we have some sort of herd, dare I say herd immunity, um, uh, or resiliency. We have broader immunity, you know,

SPEAKER_36: is that the, is that the term I'm allowed to use broader immunity? I mean, you're allowed to say

SPEAKER_02: whatever you want. Got it. Okay. Herd immunity, I think does refer to a specific benchmark that we have not hit, but we do have more immunity, like just broadly, you know, more people have gotten it and,

Jason Calacanis: or have gotten what are said to be higher quality vaccines. And, you know, we don't have a, we don't have a great booster rate, but the vaccines overall are good. And a lot of people got it in the United

SPEAKER_00: States. I mean, this is the problem when you don't have it spread in your population, I guess you are still a target for it. And so I guess the Chinese government is going to go with shut everything down

SPEAKER_129: for 10 days and then test everybody, which we could have had that option too. We just never got testing. We had like two companies doing testing. And even now, these Binance tests, or what is it? What are they called? I think, excuse me, I think Binance is the, um, cryptocurrency

SPEAKER_136: exchange. Binance is the Binax. Binance. At home. Binance. Yes. Thank you. Binax.

SPEAKER_00: Binance. Uh, kits are, uh, I think they're now $10 per test, 20 bucks for two. And in other places

SPEAKER_01: in the world, it's two to $5 a test. So we're still only have one or two providers. And these

SPEAKER_08: other places have 70 different tests, including ones that I think you just swab your mouth and

SPEAKER_01: you're done. Yeah. What a disaster. But hopefully this does not create massive supply chains, not because we need to open our trunks with our feet as cool feature that is. I just think on the economy front, it would be really tragic that the reopening doesn't happen. And we move into, you know, goods and services, uh, not flowing and then companies going out of business and then jobs going away. Yeah. It's very hard to understand what's going on because there's now 11.6 million job openings, 5 million people looking for jobs. So somewhere or 6 million, you know, these numbers are not perfect, but basically there's five, 6 million extra jobs in the United

SPEAKER_117: States right now. Uh, so, and record savings and this will be just, I mean, look, if there's a

SPEAKER_02: pandemic anywhere, right? I guess that's the, that's the, what the word means is that it's everywhere. So if there are outbreaks anywhere, there are effectively outbreaks everywhere. Like, unless there's,

SPEAKER_01: it could impact us. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. We're all connected. One of the things I think is a silver lining here is on consumption, you know, this backlog of cars being available and everybody drives their car for another year. I guess that's arguably good for the environment that we're not consuming as much. Uh, and that's actually one of the approaches I've taken in my life. Like I decided I wasn't going to order anything on Amazon for 30 days because I was like, I just have all this stuff I ordered and I have this very like heavy Amazon finger where I just click too hard too often. And I think I'm just taking a 30 day break. Balls. Yeah, I just keep clicking. And, um, you know, now, uh, it's been nice to not have any packages coming for me at least because the opening of the packages and I mean, this is the modern era of abundance. I think it's nice to like buy things. I told you the other thing I'm doing is buying things once for the rest of my life. So my Crockett and Joan shoes, my Danner boots, my skillet, my giant crock pot from La Crusade. I don't know what they call those Dutch oven, the Dutch oven. Like, I'm looking at all these things at 50 and I'm just saying last Dutch oven I ever buy last pair of boots I ever buy last ski jacket I buy. I want to get one that last 10 years or 20 years. I just want to buy like the best thing, the most durable, most sustainable and start looking at life that way,

SPEAKER_315: as opposed to this constant disposable culture of everything. Yep. I'm with you and people bought a lot

Jason Calacanis: of crap during the pandemic, which is partly why, I mean, you know, we keep talking about the supply chain

SPEAKER_02: back up and this and that. And at least what you know, one of the major factors here was not just that supply chains were screwed up. It's that Americans bought a crap ton. Yes, of crap.

SPEAKER_00: Everybody bought a bicycle. Everybody was like, I want to buy a new car. Everybody's like, I want to buy, I want to start taking tennis lessons, a guitar, everything. Yeah. So there you have it. Yeah. All right. There you have it. All right. We'll see you next time on this week in startups.

SPEAKER_320: Bye bye. Bye. Hey everyone. Producer Nick here. I want to tell you about the SaaS syndicate. If you're

SPEAKER_21: a founder of a SaaS company with a product and market, our investment team wants to talk to you, head over to the syndicate.com slash SaaS, S A A S to apply to raise from the SaaS syndicate. And you can join Jason's syndicate of over 9,000 accredited investors at the syndicate.com.

SPEAKER_321: Producer Justin here. No cool startup. Check out openscouting.com where anyone can refer a startup to our investment team here at launch. Even if you don't know the founder, if you're the first to flag a company for us and we decide to invest, you'll get 5k in cash or 10%

SPEAKER_324: of our carry. Hey everybody. Producer Rachel here. Are you an early stage startup that has product and market some traction and are looking to raise at least $500,000? Apply today to remote demo day for your chance to pitch to over 9,000 investors in Jason's syndicate. Submit your application at remote demo day.com. Our next event is on April 27th. And if you want to learn how to invest in

SPEAKER_19: startups from the world's greatest angel investor, and no, we're not talking about Chris Saka,

SPEAKER_21: then head to angel.university to apply. The four hour workshop costs $300 and all proceeds are donated to charity. To date, we've donated over $175,000 to various charities, and you can see the full list at angel.university.com.